No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Imitation and the effort of learning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2008
Abstract
Central to Hurley's argument is the position that imitation is “automatic” and requires inhibition. The evidence for this is poor. Imitation is intentional, involves active comparison between self and other, and involves new learning to improve self-other likeness. Abnormal imitation behaviour may result from impaired learning rather than disinhibition. Mentalizing may be similarly effortful and dependent upon learning about others.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Aicken, M. D., Wilson, A. D., Williams, J. H. & Mon-Williams, M. (2007) Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times. Brain and Cognition 63:304–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amodio, D. M. & Frith, C. D. (2006) Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 7:268–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A. & Prinz, W. (2000) Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition 44:124–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., Derrfuss, J. & von Cramon, D. Y.. (2005) The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 43:89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M. & Heyes, C. M. (2005) Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:489–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzola, V., Aziz-Zadeh, L. & Keysers, C. (2006) Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Current Biology 16:1824–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H. & Király, I. (2002) Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415:755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, G. (2003) Apraxia and beyond: Life and work of Hugo Liepmann. Cortex 39:509–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, V. & Whiten, A. (2005) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan trogiodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition 8:164–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansson, E., Wilson, A. D., Williams, J. H. & Mon-Williams, M. (2007) Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture. Experimental Brain Research 182:549–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y. & Blakemore, S. J. (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 13:522–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lhermitte, F., Pillon, B. & Serdaru, M. (1986) Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Annals of Neurology 19:326–34.Google Scholar
Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R. & Heyes, C. (2005) Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Brain research: Cognitive Brain Research 25:632–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A. & Singh, T. (2004) A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34:285–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., Waiter, G. D., Pechey, S. & Perrett, D. I. (2007) Cortical and subcortical mechanisms at the core of imitation. Social Neuroscience 2:66–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z. & Flanagan, J. R. (2001) Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:487–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed