Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:07:03.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In defense of descriptive behaviorism, or theories of learning still aren't necessary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

W. Scott Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa 50311

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baum, W.Definition in behavior science: A review of B. B. Wolman's Dictionary of Behavioral Science. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22: 445–51. 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catania, A. C.The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1: 103–16. 1973.Google Scholar
Guttman, N.On Skinner and Hull: A reminiscence and projection. American Psychologist, 32: 321–28.1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, W. K., and Staddon, J. E. R.Handbook of Operant Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. F.The aims of scientific activity. The Monist, 2. 1968.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F.A case history in the scientific method. American Psychologist, 11: 221–33. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
Herrnstein and the evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologist, 32: 10061012.1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staddon, J.E.ROn the notion of cause, with applications to behaviorism. Behaviorism, 1: 2563. 1973.Google Scholar
Wood, W. S. Language, truth, and the law of effect. A paper presented at the 84th convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar