Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T22:40:49.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intentionality is a red herring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Chris Fields  and
Eric Dietrich
Chris Fields
Affiliation:
Center for Cybernetic Communication Research, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. 80523
Eric Dietrich
Affiliation:
Center for Cybernetic Communication Research, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 756 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brentano, F. (1874) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig. [RP]Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1925) The distinction between mental and physical phenomena. In: (1961) Realism and the background of phenomenology, ed. Chisholm, R. M.. Free Press. [WTB]Google Scholar
Brindley, G. S. & Lewin, W. S. (1968) The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 196:479–93. [RP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R., Earle, D. G, & Lea, S. E. C. (1986) Not an alternative model for intentionality in vision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:138–39. [RVG, KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1982) Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin 92:111–35. [WTB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churchland, P. M.(1986) Semantic content: In defense of a network approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:139–40. [RVG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R.(1977) Programs in the explanation of behavior.Philosophy of Science 44:269–87. [CF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R.(1983) The nature of psychological explanation. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [CF]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1971) Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy 68:87–106. [RVG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C.(1978) Brainstorms. Bradford Books [KPI]Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1981) Knowledge and the flow of information. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [CF, KP]Google Scholar
Dubin, M., Stark, L. & Archer, S. (1986) A role for action-potential activity in the development of neuronal connections in the kitten retinogeniculate pathway. Journal of Neurosdence 6:1021–36. [CF]Google ScholarPubMed
Ellerman, D. P. (1986) Intentionality and information theory. Behavioral and Brian Sciences 9:143–44. [RVG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1984) Semantics, Wisconsin style. Synthese 59:231–50. [CF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton–Mifflin. [CF]Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1984) Animal thinking. Harvard University Press. [KP]Google Scholar
Heil, J. (1986) Intentionally and the explanation of behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:146–47. [RVG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, G. (1945) The organization of the visual cortex in man. Proceedings of the Royal Society (Biology) 132:348–61. [RP]Google Scholar
MacKay, D. M. (1986) Intrinsic versus contrived intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:149–50. [WTB, RVG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1986) Cognitive science and the pragmatics of behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:150. [RVG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, D. (1982) Vision. Freeman, W. H.. [CF, RVG]Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. & Pfeifer, K. (1986) Intentionality and the non-psychological. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46:531–54. [KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. & Levy, E. (1984) Teleology, error, and the human immune system. Journal of Philosophy 81:351–72. [KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morphis, M. (1986) A total process approach to perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:150–51. [RVG, KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movshon, J. A. & van Sluyters, R.(1981) Visual neural development. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32:477–522. [CF]Google ScholarPubMed
Perlis, D. & Hall, R. (1986) Intentionality as internality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:151–52. [WTB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1973a). Behavior: The control of perception. Aldine. [WTB]Google Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1973b) Feedback: Beyond behaviorism. Science 179:351–56. [WTB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, W. T. (1978) Quantitative analysis of purposive systems. Psychological Review 85:417–35. [WTB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1986) Intentionality: No mystery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:152–53. [WTB, KMS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, W. T., Clark, R. K. & McFarland, R. L. (1960a) A general feedback theory of behavior. I. Perceptual and Motor Skills Monograph 11(1, Serial No. 7). [WTB]Google Scholar
Powers, W. T., Clark, R. K. & McFarland, R. L.(1960b) A general feedback theory of behavior. II. Perceptual and Motor Skills Monograph 11(3, Serial No. 7). [WTB]Google Scholar
Rosenbleuth, A. & Wiener, N. (1950) Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior. Philosophy of Science 17:318–26. [WTB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbleuth, A., Wiener, N. & Bigelow, J. (1943) Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science 10:18–24. [WTB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1969) Consciousness: A philosophic study of minds and machines. Random House. [WTB, KMS]Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1976) Cybernetics and the philosophy of mind. Routledge and Kegan Paul. [WTB, KMS]Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1986) Intentionality and information processing: An alternative model for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:121–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1986r) Intentionality and communication theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:155–63. [WTB, RVG, KMS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1987) Cognitive science and the problem of semantics content. Synthese 70:247–69. [KMS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
searle, J. R. (1979) What is an intentional state? Mind 88:74–92. [KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
searle, J. R. (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:417–57. [CF, RP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983) Intentionality. Cambridge University Press. [CF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press. [KP]Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1977) Toward a causal theory of linguistic representation. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2:42–63. [CF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.(1982) Semantic attribution and the formality constraint. Xerox (Palo Alto Research Center) preprint. [CF]Google Scholar
Turvey, M. T. (1986) Intentionality: A problem of multiple reference frames, specificational information, and extraordinary boundary conditions on natural law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:153–55. [WTB, CF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press. [WTB]Google Scholar