No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interpersonal expectancy effects exist: what do we know beyond that?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978
References
REFERENCES
Bootzin, R. R.Experimenter and individual differences in experimenter bias. The Journal of General Psychology. 84:303–12, 1971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, A. M., Michie, P. T., Andreasen, A. C., Viney, L. L., & Rosenthal, R.Expectancy effects in a psycho-physiological experiment. Physiological Psychology. 4:137–44, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J. M. & Dana, R. H.Experimenter bias and the WAIS. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 28:694, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dusek, J. B.Experimenter-bias effects in the simple motor performance of low- and high-anxious boys and girls. Psychological Reports. 30:107–14, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felton, G. S.The experimenter expectancy effect examined as a function of task ambiguity and internal-external control. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality. 5:286–94, 1971.Google Scholar
Hertzog, J. & Walker, C. E.Effects of sex and need to avoid success on verbal mediation of experimenter bias. Psychological Reports. 32:1235–8, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. W.Inducement of expectancy and set of subjects as determinants of subjects' responses in experimenter expectancy research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 5:55–66, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. W. & Ryan, B.Observer recorder error as affected by different tasks and different expectancy inducements. Journal of Research in Personality. 10:201–14, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, L. J. P.Experimenter-subject needs for social approval and task interactiveness as factors in experimenter expectancy effects. Dissertation Abstracts International. 32 (11-B):6692–3, 1972.Google Scholar