We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Brainerd, C. J.Does prior knowledge of the compensation rule increase susceptibility to conservation training?Developmental Psychology. 12:1–5. 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Feedback, rule knowledge, and conservation learning. Child Development. 48:404–11. 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, R.Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. Cognitive Psychology. 6:544–74. 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, R. S.Sequences and synchrony in development.Talk presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting,November, 1977,Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.Representation and process in transitive inference.Paper presented at Psychonomic Society Meeting,November, 1977,Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T. How do children solve class inclusion problems? In: Siegler, R. S. (ed.), Children's Thinking: What Develops?Hillsdale, N. J., Erlbaum, in press.Google Scholar