Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:18:18.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It's high time: Cognitive neuroscience lives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2008

Karl Pribram
Karl Pribram
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Psychology Department, Washington, DC 20057. pribramk@georgetown.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neuroconstructivism (Mareschal et al. 2007a) heralds a departure from the standard “associationism” that has dominated the English speaking cognitive and neuroscience community for generations. Its central concept is context dependency: encellment, embrainment, embodiment and ensocioment. This reviewer welcomes the breath of fresh air in overcoming the “deconstructions” of postmodernism. The program is carried out with a carefully selected sample of empirical evidence with an emphasis on development. This review points to some of the books' strengths and shortcomings, and adds a few observations that carry the program further.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 343 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mareschal, D., Johnson, M. H., Sirois, S., Spratling, M., Thomas, M. & Westermann, G. (2007a) Neuroconstructivism, vol. I: How the brain constructs cognition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mareschal, D., Sirois, S. Westermann, G. & Johnson, M. H. (2007b) Neuroconstructivism, vol. II: Perspectives and prospects. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribram, K. H. (1965) Proposal for a structural pragmatism: Some neuropsychological considerations of problems in philosophy. In: Scientific psychology: Principles and approaches, ed. Worden, B. & Nagel, E., pp. 426–59. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Pribram, K. H. (1974) How is it that sensing so much, we can do so little? In: Central processing of sensory input, ed. Schmitt, F. O. & Worden, F. G., contributing ed. Schmitt, F. O. & Worden, F. G., pp. 249–61. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. H. (1986) The role of cortico-cortical connections. In: Two hemispheres, one brain: Functions of the corpus callosum, ed. Lapore, F., Ptito, M. & Jasper, H., pp. 523–40. Alan Liss.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. H. (1991) Images of achievement and action spaces: Somatic processes in the control of action. In: Brain and perception: Holonomy and structure in figural processing, pp. 121–61. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. H. (2006) What makes humans humane. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration 1:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine (1980) From being to becoming. Freeman.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984) Order out of chaos. Bantam.Google Scholar
Ungerleider, L., Ganz, L. & Pribram, K. H. (1977) Size constancy in the rhesus monkeys: Effects of pulvinar, prestriate, and inferotemporal lesions. Experimental Brain Research 27:251–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. (1983) Color coding in the prestriate cortex: the response of wave-length selective and color coded cells in the monkey to changes in wave length composition. Neuroscience 9:741–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar