No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mind God's mind: History, development, and teaching1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2016
Abstract
We dispute the target article that belief in Big Gods facilitated development of large societies and suggest that the direction of causality might be inverted. We also suggest that plain theory of mind (ToM), although necessary, is not sufficient to conceive Big Gods. Grasp of other aspects of the mind is required. However, this theory is useful for the teaching of religion.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
Footnotes
1.
All authors contributed equally to the preparation of this commentary.
References
Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G. & Mouyi, A. (2011) Educating the developing mind: Towards an overarching paradigm. Educational Psychology Review
23:601–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G. & Shayer, M. (2014) Inference, reconceptualization, insight, and efficiency along intellectual growth: A general theory. Enfance
66:365–96. doi: /10.4074/S0013754514003097.Google Scholar
Makris, N. & Pnevmatikos, D. (2007) Children's understanding of the human and super-natural mind. Cognitive Development
22(3):365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makris, N. & Pnevmatikos, D. (submitted) Inhibitory control in children's understanding of other minds.Google Scholar
Pnevmatikos, D. (2002) Conceptual changes in religious concepts of elementary schoolchildren: The case of the house where God lives. Educational Psychology
22:91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pnevmatikos, D. & Makris, N. (2010) Cross-cultural evidence for constraints in conceptual development, or, are the places where Allah and God live the same? In: Developmental Psychology, ed. Håkansson, J., pp. 117–33. Nova Science.Google Scholar
Spanoudis, G., Demetriou, A., Kazi, S., Giorgala, K. & Zenonos, V. (2015) Embedding cognizance in intellectual development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
132:32–50.Google Scholar
Target article
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Related commentaries (27)
A developmental perspective on the cultural evolution of prosocial religious beliefs
Are gods and good governments culturally and psychologically interchangeable?
Authoritarian and benevolent god representations and the two sides of prosociality
Awe: A direct pathway from extravagant displays to prosociality
Big Gods: Extended prosociality or group binding?
Clarity and causality needed in claims about Big Gods
Coerced coordination, not cooperation
Credibility, credulity, and redistribution
Cultural evolution and prosociality: Widening the hypothesis space
Divorcing the puzzles: When group identities foster in-group cooperation
Even “Bigger Gods” developed amongst the pastoralist followers of Moses and Mohammed: Consistent with uncertainty and disadvantage, but not prosocality
Explaining the success of karmic religions
Hell of a theory
Let us be careful with the evidence on mentalizing, cognitive biases, and religious beliefs
Memes and the evolution of religion: We need memetics, too
Mind God's mind: History, development, and teaching1
Monotheism versus an innate bias towards mentalizing
Moralizing gods revisited
Moralizing religions: Prosocial or a privilege of wealth?
Projecting WEIRD features on ancient religions
Prosociality and religion: History and experimentation
Recognizing religion's dark side: Religious ritual increases antisociality and hinders self-control
Religion promotes a love for thy neighbour: But how big is the neighbourhood?
Self-control, cultural animals, and Big Gods
The functions of ritual in social groups
The prosocial benefits of seeing purpose in life events: A case of cultural selection in action?
Why would anyone want to believe in Big Gods?
Author response
Parochial prosocial religions: Historical and contemporary evidence for a cultural evolutionary process