Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:05:00.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. eagly@northwestern.eduhttp://www.psychology.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core/profiles/alice-eagly.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Duarte et al.'s arguments for increasing political diversity in social psychology are based on mischaracterizations of social psychology as fundamentally flawed in understanding stereotype accuracy and the effects of attitudes on information processing. I correct their misunderstandings while agreeing with their view that political diversity, along with other forms of diversity, stands to benefit social psychology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. W. (1954/1979) The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books. (Original work published in 1954.)Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. & Glick, P. (2008) Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 40, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 61–149. Elsevier. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1998) Attitude structure and function. In: The handbook of social psychology, vol. 1, 4th edition, ed. Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G., pp. 269–322. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. & Carter, J. D. (1999) Gender-stereotype accuracy as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:350–59. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.350.Google Scholar
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J. & Merrill, L. (2009) Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin 135:555–88. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015701 Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–75. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.Google Scholar
Koenig, A. M. & Eagly, A. H. (2014) Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups' roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107:371–92. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037215 Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. & Nauts, S. (2012) Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:165–79. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008 Google Scholar
Ryan, C. S. (2003) Stereotype accuracy. In: European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 13, ed. Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M., pp. 75–109. Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis (UK). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000037 Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:797–811. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 Google Scholar
Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H. (2012) Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 46, ed. Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P., pp. 55–123. Elsevier/Academic Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7 Google Scholar