Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:15:50.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monotheism versus an innate bias towards mentalizing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Fintan John Costello
Fintan John Costello*
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4Ireland. fintan.costello@ucd.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Norenzayan et al.’s account for the spread of monotheistic “Big God” religions sees these religions originating as by-products of innate cognitive biases. These biases produce polytheistic rather than monotheistic systems, however, and so do not explain the origin of monotheism. Accounts where monotheism arises from polytheism (for political reasons, for example) appear better able to explain the spread of monotheism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e9
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, P. (2003) The rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and diversity, A.D. 200–1000, second ed. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Jones, G. (2001) A history of the Vikings, second edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (2001) The origins of biblical monotheism: Israel's polytheistic background and the Ugaritic texts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar