Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:06:36.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural number concepts: No derivation without formalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2008

Paul Pietroski
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742pietro@umd.eduhttp://www.wam.umd.edu/~pietro/jlidz@umd.eduhttp://www.ling.umd.edu/~jlidz/
Jeffrey Lidz
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742pietro@umd.eduhttp://www.wam.umd.edu/~pietro/jlidz@umd.eduhttp://www.ling.umd.edu/~jlidz/

Abstract

The conceptual building blocks suggested by developmental psychologists may yet play a role in how the human learner arrives at an understanding of natural number. The proposal of Rips et al. faces a challenge, yet to be met, faced by all developmental proposals: to describe the logical space in which learners ever acquire new concepts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dedekind, R. (1888/1963) The nature and meaning of numbers. Dover. (Original work published 1888).Google Scholar
Demopoulos, W., ed. (1994) Frege's philosophy of mathematics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1884/1974) The foundations of arithmetic. Blackwell. (Original work published 1884).Google Scholar
Zalta, E. (2003) Frege's logic, theorem, and foundations for arithmetic. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-logic.Google Scholar