Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:09:24.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neural plausibility and validation may not be so E-Z

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2004

Sara C. Sereno ,
Patrick J. O'Donnell  and
Anne B. Sereno
Sara C. Sereno*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, Scotland, United Kingdom
Patrick J. O'Donnell*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, Scotland, United Kingdom
Anne B. Sereno*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, UT-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX77030
*
s.sereno@psy.gla.ac.uk
p.odonnell@psy.gla.ac.uk
anne.b.sereno@uth.tmc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Although the E-Z Reader model accounts well for eye-tracking data, it will be judged by new predictions and consistency with evidence from brain imaging methodologies. The stage architecture proposed for lexical access seems somewhat arbitrary and calculated timings are conservatively slow. There are certain effects in the literature that seem incompatible with the model.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 502
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)