Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Spellman, Barbara A.
1996.
The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
38.
Quinsey, Vernon L.
1996.
Improving decision accuracy where base rates matter: The prediction of violent recidivism.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Anderson, Norman H.
1996.
Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Hamm, Robert M.
1996.
Physicians neglect base rates, and it matters.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Margolis, Howard
1996.
Nuancing should not imply neglecting.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
32.
Levi, Isaac
1996.
Fallacy and controversy about base rates.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Fernandez-Berrocal, Pablo
Almaraz, Julian
and
Segura, Susana
1996.
How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of systematic processing.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
21.
Funder, David C.
1996.
Base rates, stereotypes, and judgmental accuracy.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
22.
Stalker, Douglas
1996.
Where do you stand on the base rate issue?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
38.
Ginzburg, Lev R.
Janson, Charles
and
Ferson, Scott
1996.
Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
24.
McCauley, Clark
1996.
First things first: What is a base rate?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Vicente, Kim J.
1996.
The perils of reconstructive remembering and the value of representative design.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
40.
Windschitl, Paul D.
and
Wells, Gary L.
1996.
Base rates do not constrain nonprobability judgments.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
40.
Dawes, Robyn M.
1996.
The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Koehler, Jonathan J.
1996.
The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Cohen, L. Jonathan
1996.
The need for a theory of evidential weight.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
18.
Callen, Craig R.
1996.
The implications of Koehler's approach for fact finding.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
18.
Melone, Nancy Paule
and
McGuire, Timothy W.
1996.
Conservatism revisited: Base rates, prior probabilities, and averaging strategies.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
36.
Kyburg, Henry E.
1996.
Probabilistic fallacies.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Krueger, Joachim
1996.
Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
30.