Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:14:15.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possible phylogenies: The role of hypotheses, weak inferences, and falsification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2003

Thomas E. Dickins
Thomas E. Dickins*
Affiliation:
Brain and Cognition Research Group, Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, NottinghamNG1 4BU, United Kingdomhttp://ess.ntu.ac.uk/Dickins
*
thomas.dickins@ntu.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This commentary takes issue with Corballis's claim to have presented a falsifiable hypothesis. It argues that Corballis has instead presented a framework of weak inferences that, although unfalsifiable, might help to constrain future theory-building.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 219 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)