No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The prosocial benefits of seeing purpose in life events: A case of cultural selection in action?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2016
Abstract
Norenzayan et al. propose that religious beliefs with incidental prosocial effects propagated via a long-term process of cultural evolution. Applying their model, I explore a possible candidate target of cultural selection: the teleological view – often culturally elaborated as a belief in karma or fate – that life events occur to punish or reward individuals’ moral behavior.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Banerjee, K. & Bloom, P. (2014) Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition
133:277–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, K. & Bloom, P. (2015) “Everything happens for a reason:” Children's beliefs about purpose in life events. Child Development
86:503–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bering, J. (2011) The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. Norton.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M. (2006) The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
29:453–98.Google Scholar
Fein, D. & Stein, G. M. (1977) Immanent punishment and reward in six- and nine-year-old children. Journal of Genetic Psychology
131:91–96.Google Scholar
Heywood, B. T. & Bering, J. M. (2014) “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion, Brain and Behavior
4(3):183–201.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. & Bering, J. M. (2006) Hand of god, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology
4:219–33.Google Scholar
Jose, P. (1990) Just-world reasoning in children's immanent justice judgments. Child Development
61:1024–33.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1980) The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (2013) Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. & Lee, A. (2010) It was meant to happen: Explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
98(5):702–20.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932/1965) The moral judgment of the child. Trans. Gabain, M.. Free Press. (Original work published 1932.)Google Scholar
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R. & Hamedani, M. G. (2013) Who explains Hurricane Katrina and the Chilean Earthquake as an act of God? The experience of extreme hardship predicts religious meaning-making. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
44(4):606–19.Google Scholar
Willard, A. K. & Norenzayan, A. (2013) Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life's purpose. Cognition
129:379–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, M. J. & Morris, M. W. (2004) Existential meanings and cultural models: The interplay of personal and supernatural agency in American and Hindu ways of responding to uncertainty. In: Handbook of experimental existential psychology. ed. Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L. & Pyszczynski, T., pp. 215–30. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Young, M. J., Morris, M. W., Burrus, J., Krishnan, L. & Regmi, M. P. (2011) Deity and destiny: Patterns of fatalistic thinking in Christian and Hindu cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
42:1032–55.Google Scholar
Target article
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Related commentaries (27)
A developmental perspective on the cultural evolution of prosocial religious beliefs
Are gods and good governments culturally and psychologically interchangeable?
Authoritarian and benevolent god representations and the two sides of prosociality
Awe: A direct pathway from extravagant displays to prosociality
Big Gods: Extended prosociality or group binding?
Clarity and causality needed in claims about Big Gods
Coerced coordination, not cooperation
Credibility, credulity, and redistribution
Cultural evolution and prosociality: Widening the hypothesis space
Divorcing the puzzles: When group identities foster in-group cooperation
Even “Bigger Gods” developed amongst the pastoralist followers of Moses and Mohammed: Consistent with uncertainty and disadvantage, but not prosocality
Explaining the success of karmic religions
Hell of a theory
Let us be careful with the evidence on mentalizing, cognitive biases, and religious beliefs
Memes and the evolution of religion: We need memetics, too
Mind God's mind: History, development, and teaching1
Monotheism versus an innate bias towards mentalizing
Moralizing gods revisited
Moralizing religions: Prosocial or a privilege of wealth?
Projecting WEIRD features on ancient religions
Prosociality and religion: History and experimentation
Recognizing religion's dark side: Religious ritual increases antisociality and hinders self-control
Religion promotes a love for thy neighbour: But how big is the neighbourhood?
Self-control, cultural animals, and Big Gods
The functions of ritual in social groups
The prosocial benefits of seeing purpose in life events: A case of cultural selection in action?
Why would anyone want to believe in Big Gods?
Author response
Parochial prosocial religions: Historical and contemporary evidence for a cultural evolutionary process