We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bakan, D.The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin. 66:423–437, 1966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brophy, J. E. & Good, T. L.Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology. 61:365–374, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. Prospective: artifact and control. In: Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. Academic Press, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Dusek, J. B.Do teachers bias children–s learning?Review of Educational Research. 45:661–684, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. The human subject in the psychology experiment: Fact and artifact. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 8:101–147, 1975.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. & Kroy, M.Outcome validity in experimental research: A re-conceptualization. Representative Research in Social Psychology. 7:166–178, 1976.Google Scholar