Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:09:16.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Harnad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

B. F. Skinner
B. F. Skinner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 02138
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A. What is the current status of theory in radical behaviorism? Radical behaviorism is antitheoretical in the sense that it attacks and rejects traditional explanations of behavior in terms of internal initiating causes. It is anti-creationist. It turns instead, as Darwin did, to the selection of presumably random variations by contingencies of survival (ethology) and contingencies of reinforcement (the experimental analysis of behavior). In that analysis, rate of responding is taken as a basic datum and studied as a function of many contingencies of reinforcement. The results are factual, not theoretical. The analysis has “matured” by successfully analyzing more and more complex arrangements of variables. If rate of responding is taken as a measure of probability of response, an element of theory no doubt arises, and theory may be necessary in interpreting facts about behavior which are out of reach of precise prediction and control. As in modern astronomy, a laboratory science of behavior will continue, I believe, to give the best possible explanation of facts beyond experimental control – events in the world at large in the case of behavior, the waves and particles reaching the earth from outer space in the case of astronomy. The depth and breadth of both fields depend not upon improvements in theory but upon success in the analysis of presumably similar phenomena where some degree of prediction and control is possible.

Type
Summing Up
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 721 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, D. J. & Ebbesen, E. B. (1978) Reinforcement and substitution in humans: A multiple-response analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 30:243–53. [ACC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catania, A. C. (1978) The psychology of learning: Some lessons from the Darwinian revolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 309:18–28. [ACC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catania, A. C. (1983) Behavior analysis and behavior synthesis in the extrapolation from animal to human behavior. In: Animal models of human behavior, ed. Davey, G.. Wiley. [ACC]Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal behavior. Language 35:26–58. [ACC, BFS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press. [ACC]Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982) The extended phenotype. W. H. Freeman and Company. [ACC]Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Karpman, M. & Trattner, T. (1967) What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation? Journal of Experimental Psychology 74:342–50. [ACC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, E. H. (1963) Childhood and society. Rev. ed.W. W. Norton. [BFS]Google Scholar
Guttman, N. (1959) Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58:335–40. [BFS]Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H. & Cable, C. (1976) Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2:285–311. [BFS]Google Scholar
Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C. & Sagvolden, T. (1977) Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 27:453–67. [ACC]Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1958) The theory of evolution. Penguin Books. [ACC]Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. (1927) Conditioned reflexes. Trans. Anrep, G. V.. Oxford University Press. [BFS]Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1959) Toward empirical behavior laws: I. Positive reinforcement. Psychological Review 66:219–33. [ACC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D. (1971) Catching up with common sense or two sides of a generalization: Reinforcement and punishment. In: The nature of reinforcement, ed. Glaser, R.. Academic Press. [ACC]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. & Burkhard, B. (1978) The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning. Psychological Review 85:22–47. [ACC]Google Scholar
Sherrington, C. (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. Scribner's. [BFS]Google Scholar
Sidman, M. & Stoddard, L. T. (1967) The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 10:3–15. [BFS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, G. G. (1953) The major features of evolution. Columbia University Press. [ACC]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1934) A discrimination without previous conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20:532–36. [BFS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B. F. (1938) The behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [BFS]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1953) Science and human behavior. Macmillan. [ACC]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [BFS]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1956) Freedom and the control of men. American Scholar 25:47–65. [ACC]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1975) The shaping of phylogenic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 24:117–20. [ACC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B. F. (1984a) Cognitive science and behaviorism. [BFS]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1984b) The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 41:217–21. [ACC]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F., & Julià, P. (1984) Reply to Place: “Three senses of the word ‘tact’”. Behaviorism. In press. [BFS]Google Scholar
Terrace, H. S. (1963) Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 6:223–32. [BFS]Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55:189–208. [BFS]Google Scholar