No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Staying alive” in the context of intimate partner abuse
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2022
Abstract
Females are disproportionately affected by intimate partner abuse that can result in severe physical and mental harm. Benenson et al. provide little exploration of how female-evolved traits enhance females' survival in abusive relationships. Discussion centres on “why” females do not “just leave” an abusive relationship and the effectiveness of female-evolved traits in navigating intimate partner abuse over time.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2005). Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 85–96. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-6234-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandan, J. S., Thomas, T., Bradbury-Jones, C., Taylor, J., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Nirantharakumar, K. (2020). Risk of cardiometabolic disease and all-cause mortality in female survivors of domestic abuse. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9(4), e014580. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, D., & White, A. K. (Eds.). (2010). Promoting men's mental health. Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
Conroy, S. (2021). Family Violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2019. Statistics Canada; 2019 [accessed November 20, 2020]. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2021001/article/00001-eng.htmGoogle Scholar
Cotter, J., Granger, K., Backx, R., Hobbs, M., Looi, C. Y., & Barnett, J. H. (2018). Social cognitive dysfunction as a clinical marker: A systematic review of meta-analyses across 30 clinical conditions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 84, 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Macedo Bernardino, Í., Santos, L. M., Ferreira, A. V. P., de Almeida Lima, T. L. M., da Nóbrega, L. M., & d'Avila, S. (2018). Intimate partner violence against women, circumstances of aggressions and oral-maxillofacial traumas: A medical-legal and forensic approach. Legal Medicine, 31, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2017.12.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePierro, J., D'andrea, W., & Pole, N. (2013). Attention biases in female survivors of chronic interpersonal violence: Relationship to trauma-related symptoms and physiology. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4, 1–10. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.19135Google ScholarPubMed
Eckstein, J. J. (2011). Reasons for staying in intimately violent relationships: Comparisons of men and women and messages communicated to self and others. Journal of Family Violence, 26(1), 21–30. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9338-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einolf, C. J. (2011). Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1092–1112. doi: 10.1177/0899764010385949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humeny, C., Forth, A., & Logan, J. (2021). Psychopathic traits predict survivors’ experiences of domestic abuse. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H., Eriksson, L., Mazerolle, P., & Wortley, R. (2019). Intimate femicide: The role of coercive control. Feminist Criminology, 14(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1177/1557085117701574Google Scholar
Karakurt, G., Patel, V., Whiting, K., & Koyutürk, M. (2017). Mining electronic health records data: Domestic violence and adverse health effects. Journal of Family Violence, 32(1), 79–87. doi: 10.1007/s10896-016-9872-5Google ScholarPubMed
Lalley-Chareczko, L., Segal, A., Perlis, M. L., Nowakowski, S., Tal, J. Z., & Grandner, M. A. (2017). Sleep disturbance partially mediates the relationship between intimate partner violence and physical/mental health in women and men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(16), 2471–2495. doi: 10.1177/0886260515592651Google ScholarPubMed
Mackenzie, C. S., Gekoski, W. L., & Knox, V. J. (2006). Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: The influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging and Mental Health, 10(6), 574–582. doi: 10.1080/13607860600641200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mechanic, M., Weaver, T., & Resick, P. (2008). Risk factors for physical injury among help-seeking battered women: An exploration of multiple abuse dimensions. Violence Against Women, 14(10), 1148–1165. doi: 10.1177/1077801208323792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, D., Aue, T., Suardi, F., Kutlikova, H., Cordero, M., Rossignol, A., & … Schechter, D. (2015). Violence-related PTSD and neural activation when seeing emotionally charged male–female interactions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(5), 645–653. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nawijn, L., van Zuiden, M., Frijling, J. L., Koch, S., Veltman, D., & Olff, M. (2015). Reward functioning in PTSD: A systematic review exploring the mechanisms underlying anhedonia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 189–204. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, E., Machin, A., & Dunbar, R. I. (2021). Sex differences in intimacy levels in best friendships and romantic partnerships. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 7(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosky, E., Blair, J. M., Betz, C. J., Fowler, K. A., Jack, S. P., & Lyons, B. H. (2017). Racial and ethnic differences in homicides of adult women and the role of intimate partner violence – United States, 2003–2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(28), 741. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1Google ScholarPubMed
Plana, I., Lavoie, M., Battaglia, M., & Achim, A. (2014). A meta-analysis and scoping review of social cognition performance in social phobia, posttraumatic stress disorder and other anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(2), 169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.09.005Google ScholarPubMed
Schweizer, S., & Dalgleish, T. (2011). Emotional working memory capacity in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(8), 498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirl, J. D., Jones, K. E., Copeland, P., Khatra, O., Taylor, E. H., & Van Donkelaar, P. (2019). Characterizing symptoms of traumatic brain injury in survivors of intimate partner violence. Brain Injury, 33(12), 1529–1538. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1658129Google ScholarPubMed
Sylaska, K. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1177/1524838013496335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderlind, W. M., Millgram, Y., Baskin-Sommers, A. R., Clark, M. S., & Joormann, J. (2020). Understanding positive emotion deficits in depression: From emotion preferences to emotion regulation. Clinical Psychology Review, 76, 101826. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, M., Gillispie-Bell, V., Cruz, K., Davis, K., & Vilda, D. (2021). Homicide during pregnancy and the postpartum period in the United States, 2018–2019. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 138(5), 762–769. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Y. J., Ho, M. H. R., Wang, S. Y., & Miller, I. S. (2017). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1), 80–93. doi: 10.1037/cou0000176Google ScholarPubMed
Target article
Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy
Related commentaries (22)
An expanded “staying alive” theory (SAT) underplays complexity in Homo sapiens
Beyond individual sex differences: “Staying alive theory” as an adaptive complex
Biological sex, by-products, and other continuous variables
Female advantage in threat avoidance manifests in threat reaction but not threat detection
Harm or protection? Two-sided consequences of females' susceptible responses to multiple threats
Only as a last resort: Sociocultural differences between women and men explain women's heightened reaction to threat, not evolutionary principles
Pathological complexity and the evolution of sex differences
Psychological and behavioral implications of self-protection and self-enhancement
Sex differences are insufficient evidence of ecological adaptations in human females
Sex differences in longevity are relative, not independent
Sex-dependent selection, ageing, and implications for “staying alive”
Societies also prioritize female survival
Somatic maintenance/reproduction tradeoffs and human evolution
Staying alive enhances both women's and men's fitness
Staying alive includes adaptations for catalyzing cooperation
The pregnancy compensation hypothesis, not the staying alive theory, accounts for disparate autoimmune functioning of women around the world
The “staying alive” theory reinforces stereotypes and shows women's lower quality of life
Toward a more domain-specific conceptualization of female traits: A commentary on Benenson et al. (2022)
Women amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-protection through the behavioral immune system
Women need to stay alive and protect reproductive choice
Women take risks to help others to stay alive
“Staying alive” in the context of intimate partner abuse
Author response
Females undergo selection too