Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:58:10.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A structuralist view of explanation: a critique of Brainerd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

David R. Olson
David R. Olson
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 1V6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 197 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bamberger, J. Personal communication, June, 1977.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D.Structure and Direction in Thinking. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. Semantics. In: Lyons, J. (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S.Psychology and the image of man: Herbert Spencer Lecture. Times Literary Supplement, (1590), Dec. 17, 1976.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon, 1975.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Culler, J.Structuralist Poetics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGeorge, R., and DeGeorge, F. (eds.), The Structuralists from Marx to Levi-Strauss. New York: Anchor Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W.Pattern and Meaning in History. New York: Harper and Row, 1961.Google Scholar
Douglas, M.Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. New York: Vintage Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Frye, N.Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagne, R. M.The acquisition of knowledge. Psychological Review. 69. 355–65, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C.The interpretation of cultures. London: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Habemnas, J.Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G.Aspects of Scientific Explanation And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.Verbal communication. Scientific American. 227:82–96, 1972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, E. Structuralism in social anthropology. In: Robey, D. (ed.), Structuralism: An Introduction. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C.Structural Anthropology. London: Penguin Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., and Johnson-Laird, P. N.Language and Perception. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R.Cognitive Development: The Child's Acquisition of Diagonality. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.Structuralism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968.Google Scholar
Robey, D. (ed.), Structuralism: An Introduction. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, J. Personal communication, June, 1977.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics. 25:3–51. 1971.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.Laphonologie actuelle. Journal de Psychologic 30:246. 1933.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H.The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar