Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:51:46.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The trade-off between speed and complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Mark Andrew Changizi
Mark Andrew Changizi
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180. changizi@rpi.eduhttp://www.changizi.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hypothesis that there has been selection pressure for mechanisms which enable us to perceive the present tends to be conflated with the hypothesis that there has been selection pressure for mechanisms that compensate for inevitable neural delay. The relationship between the two is more subtle, because increases in neural delay can be advantageous for building more useful perceptions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 203
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Changizi, M. A. (2001) “Perceiving the present” as a framework for ecological explanations of the misperception of projected angle and angular size. Perception 30:195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changizi, M. A. (2003) The brain from 25,000 feet: High level explorations of brain complexity, perception, induction and vagueness. Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changizi, M. A., Hsieh, A., Nijhawan, R., Kanai, R. & Shimojo, S. (in press) Perceiving-the-present and a systematization of illusions. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Changizi, M. A. & Widders, D. (2002) Latency correction explains the classical geometrical illusions. Perception 31:1241–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed