Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:02:40.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding A-not-B errors as a function of object representation and deficits in attention rather than motor memories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Ted Ruffman
Ted Ruffman
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QG, United Kingdomtedr@biols.susx.ac.uk www.biols.susx.ac.uk/groups/ep.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, I raise several points. First, I argue that non-search tasks show that the A-not-B task is about object representation, even if perseveration can occur without objects. Second, I provide an alternative interpretation for the finding that changing body posture reduces A-not-B errors. Third, I provide an alternative interpretation for the finding of convergence in reaching behavior in two-target tasks. Fourth, I suggest attention deficits can explain the A-not-B error on their own with no necessity for motor memories.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 61
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)