Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:15:50.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What about embodiment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

David Spurrett*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, University of Natal, Durban, 4041, South Africa http://www.nu.ac.za/undphil/spurrett/

Abstract:

I present reasons for adding an embodiment criterion to the list defended by Anderson & Lebiere (A&L). I also entertain a likely objection contending that embodiment is merely a type of dynamic behavior and is therefore covered by the target article. In either case, it turns out that neither connectionism nor ACT-R do particularly well when it comes to embodiment.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)