Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:49:31.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2002

KATE E. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK
ANDY PURVIS
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
ANN MacLARNON
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK
OLAF R. P. BININDA-EMONDS
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, Kaiserstraat 63, P.O. Box 9516, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
NANCY B. SIMMONS
Affiliation:
Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy), American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York 10024, USA
Get access

Abstract

We present the first estimate of the phylogenetic relationships among all 916 extant and nine recently extinct species of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera), a group that accounts for almost one-quarter of extant mammalian diversity. This phylogeny was derived by combining 105 estimates of bat phylogenetic relationships published since 1970 using the supertree construction technique of Matrix Representation with Parsimony (MRP). Despite the explosive growth in the number of phylogenetic studies of bats since 1990, phylogenetic relationships in the order have been studied non-randomly. For example, over one-third of all bat systematic studies to date have focused on relationships within Phyllostomidae, whereas relationships within clades such as Kerivoulinae and Murinae have never been studied using cladistic methods. Resolution in the supertree similarly differs among clades: overall resolution is poor (46.4% of a fully bifurcating solution) but reaches 100% in some groups (e.g. relationships within Mormoopidae). The supertree analysis does not support a recent proposal that Microchiroptera is paraphyletic with respect to Megachiroptera, as the majority of source topologies support microbat monophyly. Although it is not a substitute for comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of primary molecular and morphological data, the bat supertree provides a useful tool for future phylogenetic comparative and macroevolutionary studies. Additionally, it identifies clades that have been little studied, highlights groups within which relationships are controversial, and like all phylogenetic studies, provides preliminary hypotheses that can form starting points for future phylogenetic studies of bats.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Cambridge Philosophical Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)