Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:13:43.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The avifauna of the Polylepis woodlands of the Andean highlands: the efficiency of basing conservation priorities on patterns of endemism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

J. Fjeldså
J. Fjeldså
Affiliation:
Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Andean páramo and puna zones may once have been densely dotted by woodlands, mainly of Polylepis, but human impact has now led to a highly disjunct distribution of this habitat. Because of the habitat fragmentation, many specialized woodland birds now show relictual distributions. Speciations to the Polylepis zone took place in Peru and Bolivia during cold/arid climatic periods, as Polylepis-dominated woodland refuges were isolated away from the humid cis-Andean zone and the pre-Andean scrub-forest in Bolivia. An efficient protection of biodiversity in a minimum of well-managed areas could be achieved, if efforts were concentrated in highlands near the proposed Pleistocene woodland refuges: 55% of all endemic and 67% of all threatened and near-threatened landbirds of the high Andean zone of Peru and Bolivia were recorded within three 10 x 10 km study plots near Cochabamba in Bolivia and east of Abancay and on the east slope of Cordillera Blanca in Peru. The biological basis for the efficiency of this approach is discussed.

Los páramos y punas Andinas pueden haber estado densamente poblados de bosques, principalmente de Polylepis, pero el impacto humano ha causado una distribución muy esparcida de este habitat. Debido a la fragmentatión del habitat, muchos pájaros especializados al bosque, ahora muestran distribuciones rudimentales. La diferenciación de las espeties en la zona de Polylepis se dió en Perú y Bolivia durante períodos climáticos fríos/aridos, al igual que los refúgios de bosques dominados por Polylepis fueron aislados de la zona húmeda cis-Andina y de la zone chaqueña en Bolivia. Se podría lograr una protección efitiente de la biodiversidad en un mínimo de áreas bien manejadas, si se concentrasen los esfuerzos en las sierras cerca de los refúgios propuestos de bosque Pleistocenico. Así es, que un 55% de los pájaros endémicos y 67% de todos los especies en peligro de extintión de la zona alto-Andina de Perú y Bolivia fueron registrados dentro de tres áreas de estudio de 10 × 10 km, cerca de Cochabamba en Bolivia, y al sureste de Abancay y en la vertiente oriental de la Cordillera Blanca en Perú. El artículo diserta los processos básicos.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 37 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1993

References

Ackery, P. R. and Vane-Wright, R. I. (1984) Milkweed butterflies. London: British Museum, Natural History.Google Scholar
Ansión, I. (1986) El arbol y el bosque en la sociedad andina. Lima: Instituto Nacional Forestal y Fauna - FAO.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J., Gonzaga, L. P., Krabbe, N., Madroño Nieto, A., Naranjo, L. G., Parker, T. A. and Wege, D. C. (1992) Threatened birds of the Americas: the ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book. Cambridge U.K.: International Council for Bird Preservation.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1985) Historical biogeography and patterns of differentiation within the South American avifauna: areas of endemism. Pp. 49–84 in Buckley, P. A., Foster, M. S., Morton, E. S., Ridgely, R. S. and Buckley, F. G., eds. Neotropical ornithology. Washington D.C.: American Ornithologists' Union (Orn. Monogr. 36).Google Scholar
Earls, J. (1991) Ecología y agronomía en los Andes. La Paz: Hisbol.Google Scholar
Ellenberg, H. (1958) Wald oder Steppe? Die Natürliche Pflanzendecke der Anden Perus. Umschau 1958: 645–681.Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1987) Birds of relict forests in the high Andes of Peru and Bolivia. Copenhagen: Zoological Museum.Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1988) Status of birds of the steppe habitats of the Andean zone and Patagonia. Pp. 81–95 in Goriup, P. D., ed. Ecology and conservation of grassland birds. Cambridge U.K.: International Council for Bird Preservation (Techn. Publ. 7).Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1991a) The activity of birds during snow-storms in high-level woodlands in Peru. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 111: 4–11.Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1991b) The conservation of biological diversity: using birds to set priorities. Pp. 157–175 in Hansen, J. Aa., ed. Environmental concerns - an interdisciplinary exercise. London and New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1992) Biogeographic patterns and evolution of the avifauna of the relict high altitude woodlands of the Andes. Steenstrupia 18: 9–62.Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1993) A comparison of African and South American avifaunas using molecular clocks. Proc. VIII Pan-Afr. Orn. Congr.: 67–75.Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. and Drabbe, N. (1990) Birds of the high Andes. Copenhagen: Zoological Museum, and Svendborg: Apollo Books.Google Scholar
Frimer, O. and Nielsen, S. M. (1989) The status of Polylepis forests and their avifauna in Cordillera Blanca, Peru. Copenhagen: Zoological Museum.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. (1992) Tropical forest biodiversity: distribution patterns and their conservation significance. Oikos 63: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Hammen, T. and Cleef, A. M. (1986) Development of the high Andean páramo flora and vegetation. Pp. 153–201 in Vuilleumier, F. and Monasterio, M., eds. High altitude tropical biogeography. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. C. S., Wright, H. E. and Bradbury, J. P. (1984) Pollen studies in the Junín area, central Peruvian Andes. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 95: 1454–1465.Google Scholar
ICBP (1992) Putting biodiversity on the map: priority areas for global conservation. Cambridge U.K.: International Council for Bird Preservation.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. (1983) Die Verbreitung von Polylepis-Beständen in der Westkordillera Boliviens. Tuezenia 3: 101–112.Google Scholar
Krabbe, N. (1991) Avifauna of the temperate zone of the Ecuadorian Andes. Copenhagen: Zoological Museum technical report.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C. H. (1965) Skaftafell, Iceland - a living glacial refugium. Oikos (Suppl.): 1–142.Google Scholar
Laegaard, S. (1992) Influence of fire in the grass páramo vegetation of Ecuador. Pp. 151–170 in Balslev, H. and Luteyn, J. L., eds. Paramo. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. (1969) Patterns of communities in the tropics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1: 19–30.Google Scholar
Major, J. (1988) Refugia: a botanical perspective. Pp. 117–146 in Myers, A. A. and Giller, P. S., eds. Analytical biogeography. London and New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Margules, C. R., Nicholls, A. O. and Pressey, R. L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 46: 63–76.Google Scholar
Parker, T. A., Schulenberg, T. S., Graves, G. R. and Braun, M. J. (1985) The avifauna of the Huancabamba region, northern Peru. Pp. 169–197 in Buckley, P. A., Foster, M. S., Morton, E. S., Ridgely, R. S. and Buckley, F. G., eds. Neotropical ornithology. Washington D.C.: American Ornithologists' Union (Orn. Monogr. 36).Google Scholar
Povolny, D. (1990) Gnorimoschemini of Peru and Bolivia (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). Steenstrupia 16: 153–223.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (1989) Speciation and diversity: the integration of local and regional processes. Pp. 599–622 in Otte, D. and Endler, J. A., eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Simpson, B. (1979) A revision of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae: Sanguisorbeae). Smithsonian Contrib. Bot. 43: 1–62.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. and Winter, B. (1983) A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Colombia and Ecuador. Biol. Conserv. 27: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuilleumier, F. (1984) Patchy distribution and systematics of Oreomanes fraseri (Aves ?Coeribidae) of Andean Polylepis woodlands. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2777.Google Scholar
Vuilleumier, F. and Simberloff, D. (1982) Ecology versus history as determinants of patchy and insular distributions in high Andean birds. Evol. Biol. 12: 235–379.Google Scholar
Williams, P. H., Humphries, C. J. and Vane-Wright, R. I. (1991) Measuring biodiversity: taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities. Austral. Syst. Bot. 4: 665–679.Google Scholar
Wing, E. (1986) Domestication of Andean mammals. Pp. 246–264 in Vuilleumier, F. and Monasterio, M., eds. High altitude tropical biogeography. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar