Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:49:47.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roman Chain-mail: Experiments to Reproduce the Techniques of Manufacture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

David Sim
David Sim
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Britannia , Volume 28 , November 1997 , pp. 359 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © David Sim 1997. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

120 M.C. Bishop and J.C.N. Coulston, Roman Military Equipment (1993), 59-60; 85, 167.

121 L. Biek, Archaeology and the Microscope. The Scientific Examination of Archaeological Evidence (1963).

122 H. Russell Robinson, The Armour of Imperial Rome (1975), pls 463-6.

123 The Grosvenor Museum, Chester, Small finds No s 245, 252, and 257.

124 C. Engelhard, Denmark in the Early Iron Age Illustrated by the Recent Discoveries in the Peat Mosses of Slesvig (1866).

125 K. Raddaz, ‘ReligionsgeschichtlicheProbleme des Thorsberger Moorfundes’, in H. Jankuhn (ed.), Vorgeschichtliche Heiligtümer und Opferplätze in Mittel- undNordeuropa (1968), 190.

126 Russell Robinson, op. cit. (note 122), 164-73.

127 Caerleon chain-mail rings found in via principalis 207 Phase 5B from stores near the tribune's house, second century. Unpublished.

128 Caerleon, see note 127.

129 D.N. Sim and A. Williams, Roman Chain-mail Rings, Production and Metallography (forthcoming).

130 Sim, D.N., Beyond the Bloom; Bloom Refining and Artifact Production in Roman Britain, PhD thesis, University of Reading (1994).Google Scholar

131 Caerleon, see note 127.

132 C. Singer, E.J. Holmyard, and A.R. Hall (eds), A History of Technology (1954), 11, 75.

133 E.G and H.H. Thomsen, ‘Drawing solid wires through soft dies in antiquity’, Transactions of the ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry (1976), 1-5.

134 P. Northover, ‘Late Bronze Age Draw-plates in the Isleham Hoard’, in B. Schmid-Sikimić and P.D. Cassa (eds), Trans Europam: Beiträge zur Bronze- und Eisenzeit zwischen Atlantic und Altai: Festschrift fur Margarita Primas, Antiquitas 3,34 (1995), 15-22.

135 op. cit. (note 133).

136 E.G. and H.H. Thomsen, ‘Early wire drawing through dies’, Transactions of the ASME Journal of Engineering Industry (1974), 1216-21.

137 D. Sim, Experiments to Forge Bloom Iron into Wire (forthcoming).

138 op. cit. (note 136).

139 Found at a depth of 4.3 m, in an area described as ‘a handymans workshop’. It came from Period 3 which is dated between a.d. 97 and a.d. 104.