Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:59:10.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

J. Andreas Löwe, Richard Smyth and the Language of Orthodoxy, Reimaging Tudor Catholic Polemicism, Brill, Leiden & Boston, 2003, Studies in Medieval and Reformation Thought, vol. xcvi, pp. 274.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Francis Clark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
British Catholic History , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , May 2004 , pp. 131 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Catholic Record Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 As he himself spelled his name, although most later writers spelt it as ‘Smith’.

2 For instance, his preferred distinction is not between Catholics and Protestants but between ‘conservatives and progressives’ or between ‘traditionalists and evangelicals’.

3 As I have shown at length in my own work, Eucharistie Sacrifice and the Reformation (first published 1960, 3rd edition 1981)Google Scholar, which has considerable relevance to Lowe’s theme.

4 The Eucharistie Doctrine of Richard Smith, a summary of Ryder’s, Fr doctoral dissertation presented at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome in 1970 Google Scholar. I am glad to have had a part in the inception of that research project, the fruits of which are still of abiding value.

5 p. 197.