Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:02:14.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Implementation of a ‘Signs of Sepsis’ Learning Resource for a Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2006

Jessica Inch
Jessica Inch
Affiliation:
South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom Hospital, Epsom Surrey, UK
Get access

Abstract

The following article centres on the justification, planning and implementation of a ‘Sepsis Learning Package’ for nursing students and qualified practitioners. This takes the form of a CDROM and web site, and is concerned with the recently spotlighted area of severe sepsis recognition and the related physiology. This was initially utilised in an orthopaedic post-anaesthetic recovery unit (PACU) that doubles as a high-dependency area. This unit is prone to readmissions from the ward environment with ‘sepsis’ being among the many diagnoses. This therefore highlights the need for all staff, both ward and PACU, to recognise the signs and symptoms before the condition progresses. The unit greatly values the sharing of knowledge, in the form of group teaching sessions and scenarios. However, there was great potential for a separate vessel for learning that made use of the computers in the work environment and in turn provided some interesting advantages.

Keywords

signs of sepsisteaching resourcespost operative complications.
Type
Original Article
Information
British Journal of Anaesthetic & Recovery Nursing , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 2006 , pp. 22 - 26
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnett S, Halpin L, Speir M. Incidence of postoperative complications among coronary artery bypass patients with and without hypertension. Outcomes Management 2003; 7 (1): 33–38.Google Scholar
Bone R, Balk R, Cerra F. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies. Chest 1992; 101 (6): 1644–1655.Google Scholar
Carreon L, Puno R, Dimar J, Glassman S, Johnson J. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decomp-ression and arthrodesis in older adults. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2003; 85 (11): 2089–2092.Google Scholar
Conrick M, Dunne A, Skinner J. Learning together; the use of simulation to foster the integration of theory and practise, 2003 Available a twww.scu.edu.au/schools/nhcp/aejne/archive/vol1-1/ajan4.htm (accessed 01/03/06).
Edwards S. Innovation in skills acquisition for higher education nursing students. British Journal of Theatre Nursing 1999; 7 (6): 37–41.Google Scholar
Knowles M. The Adult Learner. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company, 1990.
Maslow A. Cited in Duchscher B. (ed.) (2000). Bending a habit: critical social theory as a framework for humanistic nursing education. Nurse Education Today 1954; 20(5): 453–462.
Mcquillan P. Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. British Medical Journal 1998; 316: 1853–1858.Google Scholar
Oud L. Determination of resolution of septic shock: time for reassessment? Critical Care Medicine 2004; 32 (12): 144.Google Scholar
Papia G, McLellen B, El-Helou P, Louie M, Rachis A, Szalai J, Simor A. Infection in hospitalized trauma patients: incidence, risk factors, and complications. Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection and Critical Care 1999; 47 (5): 923–929.Google Scholar
Parissolopous S, Kotzabassaki S. Critical care outreach and the use of early warning scoring systems: a literature review. ICUs and Nursing Web Journal 2005; 21 (13).Google Scholar
Plain English Campaign. The plain English Campaign, 2002. Available at www.pls.cpha.ca/english (accessed 24/01/06).
Quinn F. The Principals and Practise of Nurse Education. London: Chapman Hall, 1995.
Robson W, Newell J. Assessing, treating and managing patients with sepsis. Nursing Standard 2005; 19 (50): 56–64.Google Scholar
Ryan H, Cadmann C, Hann L. Critical care: setting standards for assessment of ward patients at risk of deterioration. British Journal of Nursing 2004; 13 (20): 1186–1190.Google Scholar
Schulman C, Hare K. New thoughts on sepsis: the unifier of critical care. Dimensions of Critical Care 2003; 22 (1): 20–30.Google Scholar
Shardlow S, Doel M. Practice Learning and Teaching. London: Houndsmills, 1996.
Stillwell M, Caplan E. The septic and the multiple-trauma patient. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 1989; 3: 155–183.Google Scholar
Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Severe sepsis bundles, 2004 Available at www.ihi.org (accessed 3/3/06).
Slade E, Tamber P, Vincent J. The surviving sepsis campaign: raising awareness to reduce mortality. Critical Care 2003; 7 (1): 12–14.Google Scholar
Webb C. Plain words for professionals, 2003. Available at www.plainenglish.co.uk (accessed 24/01/04).
Welsh I, Swann C. Partners in learning. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2002.
Wira C, Rivers E, Donnino M, Shiraz W, Ehsan G, Tomlanovich M. Surrogate markers for lactic acidosis in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine 2004; 32 (12): A151.Google Scholar