No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Information
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88b52/88b529add460799da219c53e19c3c6317fc3b32d" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Information
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
Brennink, A. 1986. Chromatic Notation: A Graphical Representation of Music. Montreux, Switzerland, Edition Chroma.Google Scholar
Curwen, J. 1841. How to Read Music and Understand It. Staff Notation and Tonic Sol-Fa. London, J. Curwen & Sons. [Cited by Read, 1987, p. 349-360].Google Scholar
Hegyi, E. 1975. Solfege According to the Kodaly-Concept. Kecskemet, Kodaly Pedagogical Institute.Google Scholar
Hundoegger, A. 1938. Leitfaden der Tonika Do-Lehre, mit ergdnzenden Aufsatzen (7th edition). Hannover.Google Scholar
Lajos, B. 1967. Javaslat a tizenketfoku hangrendszer uj irasmodjara (Recommendation for a new way of notating the twelve-tone system), Magyar Zene VIII, 4, 410–407. [Cited by Read, 1987, p. 366–367].Google Scholar
Parncutt, R. & Stuckey, R. 1992. Towards a standard alternative notation and terminology based on the chromatic scale. Musikometrika, 4, 117–143.Google Scholar
Pot, C. 1931. What is Klavarskribo? Slikkerveer, Holland, Klavarskribo Institute. [Postal address: Postbus 39, 2980 AA Ridderkerk, Holland; cited in Read, 1987, p. 74–77].Google Scholar
Yasser, J. 1932. A Theory of Evolving Tonality. New York, American Library of Musicology.Google Scholar