Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:33:37.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adrenocorticotrophic hormone-stimulated cortisol release by the head kidney inter-renal tissue from sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed with linseed oil and soyabean oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2010

Rachid Ganga*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria & Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
J. G. Bell
Affiliation:
Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, StirlingFK9 4LA, Scotland, UK
D. Montero
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria & Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
E. Atalah
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria & Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
Y. Vraskou
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria & Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
L. Tort
Affiliation:
Departamento of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autonóma de Barcelona, Bellaterra08193, Spain
A. Fernandez
Affiliation:
Biomar Iberia/ProAqua Nutrition, S.A., A-62, Km 99, ES-34210Dueñas, Spain
M. S. Izquierdo
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria & Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: R. Ganga, fax +34 928132908, email rachid.ganga@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mode of action of highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA) in regulating gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) head kidney (HK) cortisol production was studied through in vitro trials using a dynamic superfusion system. Fish were previously fed with different diets containing several inclusion levels of linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) for 26 weeks. Five diets were tested; anchovy oil was the only lipid source for the control diet (fish oil, FO) and two different substitution levels (70 and 100 %) were tested using either LO or SO (70LO, 70SO, 100LO and 100SO). Fatty acid compositions of the HK reflected the dietary input, thus EPA, DHA, arachidonic acid and n-3 HUFA were significantly (P < 0·05) reduced in fish fed vegetable oils compared with fish fed the FO diet. Feeding 70 or 100 % LO increased significantly (P < 0·05) cortisol release in HK after stimulation with adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), while feeding SO had no effect on this response. Cortisol stimulation factor (SF) was increased in fish fed the 70LO and 100LO diets compared with fish fed the control diet. Moreover, eicosanoid inhibition by incubating the HK tissue with indomethacin (INDO) as a cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitor, or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) as a lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitor, significantly reduced (P < 0·05) the cortisol release after ACTH stimulation in the 70LO and 100LO diets. Cortisol SF was reduced in the FO, 70LO and 100LO diets when incubating the HK with INDO or NDGA, while it was increased in the 70SO diet. The present results indicate that changing the fatty acid profile of gilthead sea bream HK by including LO and/or SO in the fish diet affected the in vitro cortisol release, and this effect is partly mediated by COX and/or LOX metabolites.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Marine teleosts have requirements for the essential long-chain highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA) of the n-3 series, DHA (22 : 6n-3) and EPA (20 : 5n-3)(Reference Watanabe, Tamiya and Oka1Reference Izquierdo4). Other studies have also pointed out the importance of the long-chain n-6 HUFA, arachidonic acid (ARA, 20 : 4n-6), as essential for marine fish(Reference Castell, Bell and Tocher5, Reference Bessonart, Izquierdo and Salhi6). These three fatty acids, as components of phospholipids, constitute a critical part of the cell membrane of most tissues and are responsible for maintaining an adequate physiological response of the cells(Reference Gurr and Harwood7, Reference Sargent, Bell, Bell, Lahlou and Vitello8), being particularly important to promote stress resistance and defence against pathogenic challenge(Reference Montero, Tort and Izquierdo9).

Stress in fish is monitored by levels of plasma cortisol, a general indicator of stressful conditions in vertebrates(Reference Pickering and Pottinger10), and its release into the circulation is controlled by the hypothalamus–pituitary–inter-renal axis. The cortisol release is preceded by the stimulation of the inter-renal tissue by secretion of pituitary hormones, in particular adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)(Reference Donaldson and Pickering11). Although some other hormones have been shown to stimulate cortisol release from inter-renal tissue, ACTH is the dominant secretagogue(Reference Schreck, Bradford and Fitzpatrick12Reference Lamers, Flik and Atsma14).

The understanding of the pathways and intracellular messengers that regulate cortisol synthesis in fish is very limited. The cortisol synthesis by ACTH has been found to be dependent on cyclic AMP as an intracellular second messenger in the coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)(Reference Patiño, Bradford and Shreck15). In mammals, the main pathway leading to corticosteroid synthesis by ACTH stimulation involves a signalling cascade integrating G-proteins, adenylyl cyclase, cyclic AMP and protein kinase A(Reference Schimmer16). Other pathways, involving protein kinase C via stimulation by angiotensin II or acetylcholine, both known secretagogues of cortisol in fish(Reference Kloas, Reinecke and Hanke17), share a role in the regulation of corticosteroid synthesis(Reference Bird, Walker and Williams18). Moreover, protein kinase A has been suggested to be a crucial stimulatory component in the ACTH-mediated signalling pathway in fish adrenal steroidogenesis(Reference Lacroix and Hontela19), whereas protein kinase C has been shown to have an inhibitory role in the acute cortisol response in fish adrenocortical cells(Reference Lacroix and Hontela19).

The mechanism of how lipids and mainly HUFA could modulate cortisol release in vertebrates is not well known. In a previous study, we showed that free HUFA modulate cortisol secretion in sea bream head kidney (HK) maintained in superfusion(Reference Ganga, Tort and Acerete20). ARA, EPA and DHA stimulated cortisol release by inter-renal tissue, while dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (20 : 3n-6) inhibited release. Besides, it was demonstrated that ACTH-induced cortisol release is partly mediated by cyclo-oxygenase (COX) metabolites(Reference Ganga, Tort and Acerete20). Moreover, PGE2 derived from ARA has been shown to modulate the sensitivity of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, which is responsible for the release of cortisol in response to stress in mammals(Reference Lands21, Reference Nye, Hockings and Grice22) and possibly also in the homologous hypothalamus–pituitary–inter-renal axis in fish(Reference Gupta, Lahlou and Botella23).

Fish oil (FO) has been the main source of HUFA in aquafeeds, but in recent years, due to the concerns about FO sustainability and cost, alternative oil sources are frequently included in fish feeds. Partial replacement of FO by vegetable oils (VO) does not affect fish growth or feed utilisation in several species(Reference Torstensen, Lie and Froyland24Reference Montero, Robaina and Caballero30). Nevertheless, high substitution levels by VO have been shown to alter fish resistance to stressful conditions by increasing their cortisol levels(Reference Montero, Kalinowski and Obach31). However, little is known about the physiological mechanisms involved in the regulation of stress by fatty acids.

Since vegetable lipids lack HUFA, its dietary inclusion may modify tissue composition, altering cell membrane fluidity, receptor-mediated cortisol response and finally leading to a reduced functionality of the target organ. In addition, vegetable lipids can reduce the availability of eicosanoid precursors ARA, EPA, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid and DHA leading to dysfunctional eicosanoids signalling(Reference Balfry, Higgs, Lim and Cheung32, Reference Tocher, Bell and Henderson33) which may affect fish response to stress.

The aim of the present study was to clarify the effect of replacing FO by linseed oil (LO) and soyabean oil (SO), in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) stress response to ACTH stimulation. For this purpose, the HK tissue was maintained in a superfusion system and incubated with inhibitors of eicosanoid. Accordingly, five diets with different levels of FO substitution (0, 70 and 100), either with LO or with SO, were fed to gilthead sea bream juveniles.

Materials and methods

Animals

The study was carried out at Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas (Canary Islands, Spain), and fish were purchased from a local fish farm (ADSA, Canary Islands, Spain). A total of 750 gilthead sea bream (S. aurata), with an average initial body weight of 45 g, were randomly distributed in 500 litre polyethylene circular tanks (forty-five fish/tank, three tanks per diet). Tanks were supplied with continuous seawater (36 ‰) flow and aeration. Fish were reared under natural photoperiod conditions of approximately 12 h dark–12 h light. Water temperature and dissolved O2 concentration during the experimental period ranged from 20·0 to 24·2°C and from 5·04 to 8·7 parts per million, respectively.

Diets

Fish were fed the experiment diets until apparent satiation (three times/d, 6 d/week), until they reached commercial market size after 26 weeks. Five isoenergetic and isonitrogenous experimental diets were formulated to provide a lipid content of 16 %. Anchovy oil was the only added lipid source in the FO diet (100 % FO). All the other diets contained VO to substitute either 70 % of the anchovy oil by LO in 70LO diet, by SO in 70SO diet or 100 % of the anchovy oil by LO and SO in 100LO and 100SO diets, respectively. FO was included in 70LO and 70SO diets at a level high enough to meet the essential fatty acid (EFA) requirements of this species(Reference Kalogeropoulos, Alexis and Henderson34).

Biochemical analysis

Lipid from the experimental diets and fish HK was extracted with chloroform–methanol (2:1, v/v) as described previously(Reference Folch, Lees and Sloane-Stanley35). The fatty acid methyl esters were obtained by transesterification with 1 % H2SO4 in methanol and purified by absorption chromatography on NH2 Sep-pack cartridges (Waters Corporation, SA, Milford, MA, USA) and were separated and quantified by GLC(Reference Christie36).

Preparation and stimulation of head kidney tissue

At the end of the feeding period, two fish were randomly taken from each tank in less than 1 min, immediately anaesthetised with 2-phenoxyethanol (1:1000, v/v), and blood was collected with a hypodermic syringe from the caudal vein to minimise haemorrhage during the extraction of the tissue. HK tissue was removed from two fish in each superfusion trial, and in all series of experiments each treatment was assayed in quadruplicates (using two fish per replica, n 8), and cut into very small fragments in HEPES Ringer medium, which was used as the superfusion medium. Afterwards, HK homogenates were pooled and distributed in eight superfusion chambers (volume: 0·2 ml) in order to obtain a homogeneous aliquot in each of them. Tissues were superfused with a HEPES (pH 7·4) Ringer's solution containing 171 mm-NaCl, 2 mm-KCl, 2 mm-CaCl2.H2O, 0·25 % (w/v) glucose and 0·03 % (w/v) bovine serum albumin(Reference Rotllant, Balm and Pérez-Sánchez37). The system was temperature controlled at 18°C, and the superfusion medium was pumped through the chamber at a rate of 75 ml/min by a Masterplex L/SR multichannel peristaltic pump (Cole Parmer Intrument Company, Vernon Hills, IL, USA).

Trials were started after 3 h of superfusion when cortisol reached a stable baseline level(Reference Rotllant, Balm and Ruane38, Reference Rotllant, Balm and Wendelaar Bonga39), in order to avoid deviations due to the different dispersion of interrenal cells in the perfusion preparation and the individual differences or the pre-stress level of each fish. After the stabilisation period of 3 h, tissues were stimulated with ACTH at a concentration of 5 nm-hACTH1-39 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 20 min. Subsequently, perfusion was maintained for another 170 min, with fraction samples being collected every 20 min during this period. In a second series of experiments to clarify the action mechanisms of HUFA and the implication of eicosanoids in this process, the tissues were incubated with a COX inhibitor (indomethacin, INDO) or lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitor (nordihydroguaiaretic acid, NDGA) for 20 min at a concentration of 25 μm diluted in superfusion medium, and subsequently the tissues were stimulated with ACTH as explained before and maintained for another 170 min, with samples being collected every 20 min. Cortisol SF was calculated by comparing maximum cortisol released along the experiment after ACTH stimulation with baseline cortisol released (maximum release − baseline release) × 100/(baseline release)(Reference Rotllant, Balm and Pérez-Sánchez37).

Cortisol measurements

Cortisol concentration in the perfused fluid was determined by RIA(Reference Rotllant, Balm and Pérez-Sánchez37). The antibody, Biolink, S.L. (Costa Mesa, CA, USA), was used in a final dilution of 1:6000. This antibody cross-reactivity is 100 % with cortisol, 11·40 % with 21-deoxycorticosterone, 8·90 % with 11-deoxycortisol and 1·60 % with 17a-hydroxyprogesterone. The radioactivity was quantified using a liquid scintillation counter. Cortisol levels are expressed as ng/g HK per h.

Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance analysis

Lipid peroxidation products were determined only in diets as thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and were analysed according to the method described by Shahidi & Hong(Reference Shahidi and Hong40).

Statistical analysis

Significance of difference (P < 0·05) between dietary treatments was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple comparison test(Reference Sokal and Rolf41), n 8. Analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS for windows 13; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Effect of vegetable oil inclusion on fatty acid compositions

Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances showed no significant difference between the diets, ranging between 8·56 and 3·85 mmol of malondialdehyde/kg of wet diet (P < 0·05), indicating no oxidation damage in the different diets.

Fatty acid composition of the diets reflected the inclusion of plant oils (Table 1). Total SFA ranged from 16·28 % in the 100LO diet to 36·68 % in the FO diet. Total monoenoics fatty acids (mainly oleic acid (18 : 1n-9, OA)) ranged from 22·62 % in the 100LO diet to 29·09 % in the 100SO diet. α-Linolenic acid (18 : 3n-3, LNA) increased with increasing inclusion of LO, from 0·48 % in the FO diet to 37·63 % in the 100LO diet. Similarly, linoleic acid (18 : 2n-6, LA) increased, particularly with the increasing inclusion of SO, from 4·02 % in the FO diet to 38·51 % in the 100SO diet. EPA and DHA were reduced by the increased content of plant oils in the diets ranging from 10·05 % in the FO diet to 2·06 % in the 100SO diet and from 7·82 % in the FO diet to 2·91 % in the 100SO diet, respectively. ARA was also decreased by the plant oil inclusion, ranging from 1·11 % in the FO diet to 0·24 % in the 100LO diet.

Table 1 Fatty acid profile of the experimental diets (% total identified fatty acids)

FO, fish oil; LO, linseed oil; SO, soyabean oil; HUFA, highly unsaturated fatty acids.

Fish HK fatty acid profile of total lipids reflected the dietary lipid composition (Fig. 1). n-3 fatty acids were significantly increased in fish fed the LO diet, while n-6 content was significantly increased in fish fed the SO diet. n-9 was also increased in fish fed the VO diet compared with fish fed the control diet, due mainly to OA increase. However, the content in HUFA (EPA, ARA and DHA), mainly n-3 series, was significantly (P < 0·05) reduced in fish fed the two VO, compared with fish fed the control diet, which was significantly reduced. Then a 45 % reduction was found in DHA from the HK of fish fed the 70LO diet, 55 % in fish fed the 100LO diet, 58 % in fish fed the 70SO diet and 61 % in fish fed the 100SO diet compared with FO-fed fish. A 64 % reduction was found in EPA from the HK of fish fed the 70LO diet, 76 % in fish fed the 100LO diet, 73 % in fish fed the 70SO diet and 80 % in fish fed the 100SO diet compared with FO-fed fish. Regarding ARA, a 16 % reduction was found in fish fed the 70LO diet, and 47 % reduction was found in fish fed the 100LO diet, 88 % in fish fed the 70SO diet and 86 % in fish fed the 100SO diet. As a consequence, the ARA:EPA ratio was also markedly affected by the inclusion of VO and differed depending on the dietary oil fed. Thus, the lowest ARA:EPA ratio was found in the HK of fish fed the 70SO diet, followed by the 100SO, FO, 70LO diets and, finally, the 100LO diet.

Fig. 1 Concentration (% total fatty acids) of 18 : 2n-6, 18 : 3n-3, 18 : 1n-9, 20 : 4n-6, 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3 in the head kidney of sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed either a fish oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) diet for 26 weeks. Values are means. a,b,c,d,e Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. , FO; , 70LO; , 100LO; ■, 70SO; , 100SO.

Effect of feeding vegetable oils on cortisol response to adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation

Feeding fish with LO increased cortisol release in HK tissue after ACTH stimulation; fish fed the 100LO diet showed the highest cortisol release at 310, 330, 370 and 390 min after ACTH stimulation, the cortisol response was characterised by a first peak at 330 min followed by a reduction at 350 and 370 min and a strongest rise at 390 min. Fish fed the 70LO diet showed the same pattern with less intensity up to 370 min, and the cortisol continued to decrease at 390 min, indicating that the effect of LO was proportional to its content in the diet. However, fish fed the 70SO and 100SO diets showed slightly lower, but NS, cortisol response after ACTH challenge (Fig. 2). Therefore, fish fed SO diets showed a tendency to inhibit cortisol response, whereas fish fed LO diets showed a significant enhancement of cortisol release.

Fig. 2 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed either fish oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation. a,b,c Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■- -, FO; –▲–, 70LO; –■–, 100LO; - -●- -, 70SO; , 100SO.

The overall cortisol release after ACTH challenge expressed as cortisol SF (Fig. 3) was significantly highest in the 100LO diet followed by the 70LO diet. No significant differences were found in cortisol SF of fish fed SO and FO diets. The correlation factor between SF and ARA:EPA in HK was 98 %, reflecting the importance of both EPA and ARA as eicosanoid precursors on cortisol secretion.

Fig. 3 Cortisol stimulation factor (SF) in head kidney of sea bream fed either fish oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8.

Implication of cyclo-oxygenase and lipoxygenase metabolites in cortisol release

Cortisol release in the HK after ACTH challenge was affected by the incubation with eicosanoid inhibitors. Control fish decreased cortisol release after ACTH stimulation when the HK tissue was incubated with both the inhibitors (INDO or NDGA) (Fig. 4), denoting the implication of metabolites from both COX and LOX enzymes in cortisol secretion. When the HK tissue was incubated with INDO and NDGA, the cortisol release was significantly decreased in fish fed the 70LO diet, indicating the modulation of the cortisol secretion by these two pathways, with this decrease being more pronounced when NDGA was used as the inhibitor compared with INDO (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed fish oil (FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, FO; - -●- -, FO+INDO; –▲- -, FO+NDGA.

Fig. 5 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 70 linseed oil (70LO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, 70LO; - -●- -, 70LO+INDO; –▲- -, 70LO+NDGA; …, FO.

In fish fed the 100LO diet, incubating the tissue with INDO or NDGA delayed the cortisol release, and the cortisol response was characterised by only one highest peak at 330 min. Incubating the tissue with NDGA decreased the cortisol release at 390 min, proving again the role of COX and LOX in the stress secretion. Also in this case, the response was delayed, and the use of NDGA was more effective in inhibiting the cortisol release than that of INDO (Fig. 6). In fish fed the 70SO diet incubating the HK tissue with INDO increased cortisol release, indicating another pathway of action in this fish species. NDGA incubation did not affect cortisol release after ACTH stimulation (Fig. 7). HK tissue from fish fed the 100SO diet showed also significantly decreased cortisol release after ACTH challenge when incubated with INDO, and there was also a slightly decreased cortisol release, but NS when the tissue was incubated with NDGA (Fig. 8).

Fig. 6 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 100 linseed oil (100LO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, 100LO; - -●- -, 100LO+INDO;–▲- -, 100LO+NDGA; …, FO.

Fig. 7 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 70 soyabean oil (70SO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). –■–, 70SO; - -●- -, 70SO+INDO; –▲- -, 70SO+NDGA; …, FO.

Fig. 8 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 100 soyabean oil (100SO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, 100SO; - -●- -, 100SO+INDO; –▲- -, 100SO+NDGA; —, FO.

Cortisol SF from the experiment using INDO and NDGA (Fig. 9) showed that incubating HK tissue with INDO in FO-fed fish reduced the cortisol SF to 26 %, and when incubated with NDGA, the SF was reduced to a 42 %. Also when the HK tissue in 70LO-fed fish was incubated with INDO or NDGA, the cortisol SF level was decreased by 39 and 66 %, respectively. HK tissue from 100LO-fed fish showed apparently the same level of decrease of the cortisol SF when incubated with INDO or NDGA corresponding to 46 %. By contrast, in fish fed the SO diet, the action of the COX and LOX inhibitors was different, such that incubating HK tissue from fish fed the 100SO diet, with INDO, reduced the cortisol SF to a 20 %, and the incubation with NDGA decreased the cortisol SF to only 10 %. By comparison, the fish fed the 70SO diet showed the opposite response to the use of COX and LOX inhibitors, as when the tissue was incubated with INDO, the cortisol SF increased by about 3-fold and when it was incubated with NDGA, the cortisol SF was increased by 60 %.

Fig. 9 Cortisol stimulation factor (SF) in head kidney of sea bream fed different diets after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic (NDGA) acid. a,b Mean values with unlike letters for each dietary treatment indicate significant difference due to INDO or NDGA addition (P < 0·05), n 8. ■, Control; , INDO; , NDGA.

Discussion

The EFA for marine fish comprise HUFA with carbon chain lengths of 20 and 22, for both the n-3 and n-6 series. Because the HUFA cannot be synthesised ‘de novo’ by the fish(Reference Sargent, Henderson, Tocher and Halver42) at a sufficient rate to meet the requirements, these EFA must be provided in the diet. HUFA are essential for normal fish growth, for its cellular structure and functions, including the maintenance of membranes and eicosanoid metabolism(Reference Henderson and Tocher43). Replacing FO, in commercial diets, with VO that are devoid of n-3 HUFA, resulted in reduced tissue levels of ARA, EPA and DHA(Reference Bell, McEvoy and Tocher25, Reference Bell, Henderson and Tocher26, Reference Montero, Robaina and Caballero30, Reference Montero, Kalinowski and Obach31, Reference Bell, Tocher and Farndale44). In this experiment, at the end of the 26-week feeding period, the fatty acid profile of HK of total lipids from gilthead sea bream reflected the dietary input. Thus, fish fed the SO diet had significantly higher levels of LA and OA, and fish fed the LO diet had significantly higher levels of LNA and OA. In addition, since LO and SO contain large quantities of C18 fatty acids, the n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio was altered, and this could affect fish health(Reference Montero, Robaina and Caballero30, Reference Montero, Kalinowski and Obach31, Reference Waagbo, Sandnes and Jorgensen45). The contents of DHA and EPA decreased significantly in fish fed VO according to the level of inclusion, for instance, EPA decreased by about 80 % in fish fed the 100SO diet and 76 % in fish fed the 100LO diet compared with fish fed the control diet, and DHA was decreased by 61 % in fish fed the 100SO diet and 55 % in fish fed the 100LO. SFA and MUFA, particularly 16 : 0, 18 : 1n-9, 20 : 1n-9 and 22 : 1n-11, are easily catabolised in fish to produce energy, while DHA and EPA are less easily catabolised via β-oxidation(Reference Sargent, Tocher, Bell, Halver and Hardy46). Thus, an increase in the OA, LA and LNA contents in HK from fish fed VO may make these PUFA more available for oxidation to produce energy necessary to deal with the stress challenges.

Under stress conditions, cortisol is secreted from inter-renal cells of the HK triggered by the corticotrophin-releasing hormone and ACTH hormonal cascade of the hypothalamus–pituitary–inter-renal axis in fish. ACTH is well known to induce the production and release of cortisol and is considered to be the major glucocorticoid stressor in fish(Reference Barton and Iwama47), playing an important regulatory role in the stress response process, especially in the metabolic adjustments to stress(Reference Mommsen, Vijayan and Moon48). Feeding gilthead sea bream with the 70LO and 100LO diets significantly increased cortisol release from HK tissue after ACTH stimulation, in accordance with previous results from in vivo studies(Reference Montero, Kalinowski and Obach31). The levels of cortisol found in the present study for the control diet-fed fish were similar to those reported in our previous study(Reference Ganga, Tort and Acerete20), whereas the results of HK from fish fed the 100LO diet were 9-fold higher than the control response, indicating an effect of including high levels of LO in diets for gilthead sea bream on its response to stress.

It is well established that HUFA provided by the diet play an important role in stress response in mammals as in fish. Enhancing the levels of dietary ARA promoted survival and resistance to stress in gilthead sea bream larvae(Reference Koven, Barr and Lutzky49, Reference Koven, Van Anholt and Lutzky50), and feeding the ARA-supplemented diet resulted in a diminution in cortisol response after net confinement compared with the fish fed a diet containing a low level of this fatty acid(Reference Van Anholt, Spanings and Koven51). In the present study, the content of ARA in HK decreased by 55 % in 70LO-fed fish, 81 % in 100LO-fed fish, 86 % in 70SO-fed fish and 88 % in 100SO-fed fish, which could be associated partly with the modulation of cortisol release levels observed in these treatments. However, a number of authors have also demonstrated the importance of EPA and DHA in stress response and stimulating cortisol release in fish(Reference Montero, Tort and Izquierdo9, Reference Ganga, Tort and Acerete20, Reference Kanazawa52Reference Liu, Caballero and Izquierdo54). In this experiment, the low dietary levels of these important HUFA in the diet led to a parallel decrease in the HK causing a significant modulation of cortisol release. These results demonstrated that feeding fish with diets poor in these EFA affected cortisol release from HK after challenging the tissue with ACTH, clearly denoting the importance of these nutrients in the correct function of HK in response to stress situations.

In the literature, there is a lack of information on the effect of PUFA (of n-3 and or n-6 series) on cortisol release and stress response in fish. The apparent contradiction in cortisol release levels found between fish fed the LO and SO could be explained by the physiological role of different fatty acids provided by these oils. Once released from the membrane, NEFA could act directly as ligands, affecting positively or negatively the binding of steroid hormones to their specific intracellular receptors(Reference Sumida55). In addition, fatty acids can also co-regulate glucocorticoid-dependent gene expression by modulating the activity of protein kinases involved in the phosphorylating transcription factors(Reference Sumida55). Therefore, they may be playing a role in modulating the intracellular steroid hormone-signalling pathway to co-regulate a glucocorticoid-sensitive promoter(Reference Vallette, Sumida and Thobie56). In human platelets, unsaturated fatty acids such as palmitoleic acid (16 : 1), OA, LA, LNA and ARA were detected to inhibit phospholipase A2 activity(Reference Ballou and Cheung57), which is the key enzyme responsible for liberating the COX and LOX substrate precursors from the membrane phospholipids.

The decrease in cortisol release in fish fed SO could be explained by the higher content of OA and LA in their tissue. In rats, the maximal steroidogenic response to ACTH was inhibited approximately to 50 % by OA, concluding that the modulation of steroidogenesis by these abundant naturally occurring lipids may be an important component of the control mechanisms within the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis(Reference Sarel and Widmaier58). It was also demonstrated that OA and LA inhibited the action of ACTH on the adrenal gland(Reference Matthys and Widmaier59). Moreover, in human subjects, some reports indicated that increasing dietary n-6:n-3 fatty acids ratio by increasing the ratio between LA and LNA up to 4:1 reduced blood cortisol and cholesterol levels(Reference Yehuda, Rabinovitz and Carasso60). Elsewhere, LA was also reported to inhibit cortisol release in bovine adrenal cells(Reference Ando, Oka and Ichihashi61). By contrast, there was increased cortisol release in HK from fish fed LO rich in LNA after ACTH stimulation. Particularly, fish fed the 100LO diet registered significantly the highest cortisol level with low-peak response, the first one at 330 min and the maximum one at 390 min; this may suggest the participation of other unknown mechanisms in such a response. These results are in accordance with a previous in vivo study, which showed that feeding sea bream with diets rich in LO increased significantly their plasma basal cortisol(Reference Montero, Kalinowski and Obach31). Recently, the same authors have demonstrated that incubating HK from seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax), using the same superfusion system and the same conditions, with free LNA increased significantly cortisol release after ACTH stimulation (D Montero, D Negrín-Báez, R Ganga, A Navarro, M Izquierdo and JM Afonso, unpublished results). In addition, it was demonstrated that reducing LNA in diets for postmenopausal women reduced the cortisol release during stress(Reference Spence, Thornton and Muir62). The present results are in accordance with these reports indicating the opposite effect of LA in fish fed SO in reducing cortisol release, while LNA increased this response in fish fed LO.

The mechanisms by which these fatty acids could modulate cortisol release in fish are still a subject of many research studies, and many hypotheses have been suggested through different pathways. Some reports suggested that the effect of LNA and LA on cortisol is mediated by protein kinase C (protein kinase A) and protein kinase A through cyclic AMP activation(Reference Matthys and Widmaier59, Reference Ando, Oka and Ichihashi61). Interestingly, one of the most important roles of these EFA is that they provide eicosanoids precursors, a well-known series of hormones produced by the actions of the COX and LOX on these fatty acids, and modulate many physiological and immunological processes. The implication of COX metabolites in cortisol release has been proved recently by in vivo studies in fish(Reference Koven, Barr and Lutzky49Reference Van Anholt, Spanings and Koven51), and in our previous in vitro study, we demonstrated that incubating HK tissue with a COX inhibitor significantly decreased cortisol release(Reference Ganga, Tort and Acerete20). In mammals, there is clear evidence that PG modulate the release of hypothalamic corticotrophin-releasing hormone and/or pituitary ACTH(Reference Abou-Samra, Catt and Aguilera63Reference Nasushita, Watanobe and Takebe65). For example, it is known that PG, and particularly PGE2, modulate the sensitivity of the mammalian hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis and consequently change the stress response(Reference Nye, Hockings and Grice22, Reference Bugajski, Gadek-Michalska and Bugajski66). COX-derived PG have been shown to increase in vitro cortisol release in inter-renal tissue of female frogs during ovulation(Reference Gobbetti and Zerani67) as well as in human adrenal cells(Reference Vakharia and Hinson68). Elsewhere, feeding sea bream with diets containing 100 % of VO as a blend of linseed (58 %), rapeseed (17 %) and palm (25 %) oils decreased significantly plasma PGE3(Reference Ganga, Bell and Montero69).

In the present study, incubating HK tissue with INDO decreased cortisol release in FO-, 70LO-, 100LO- and 100SO-fed fish, proving the implication of prostanoids in cortisol release in these fish, and this is in accordance with our previous results(Reference Ganga, Tort and Acerete20). The implication of LOX metabolites in cortisol release was recently investigated, but as far as we are aware, the present study is the first report of the implication of LOX derivatives in the modulation of cortisol secretion by HK in fish. Incubating the HK tissue with NDGA decreased the cortisol release in the majority of the treatments. This is in accordance with the results from other studies proposing the implication of the LOX pathway in stimulating ACTH release when ARA was added to fish cells in vitro (Reference Koven, Van Anholt and Lutzky50) and that LOX metabolites of ARA were reported to stimulate growth hormone release in rat anterior pituitary cells(Reference Abou-Samra, Catt and Aguilera63, Reference Won and Orth70). More studies have pointed out the role of LOX products in ACTH secretion and adrenal steroidogenesis in mammals(Reference Wang, Walker and Mason71, Reference Yamazaki, Higuchi and Kominami72). In addition, other eicosanoids such as epoxygenase metabolites could also be potential modulators of the hypothalamus–pituitary–inter-renal axis in fish, since they have been demonstrated to stimulate ACTH and endorphin secretion from rat pituitary cells(Reference Won and Orth70, Reference Michl, Beikler and Engelhardt73, Reference Cowell, Flower and Buckingham74).

In conclusion, studies carried out with fatty acids require great care in interpretation. There is a clear suggestion that changing the ratios between n-3 and n-6 fatty acids in sea bream diets by including LO and/or SO as substitutes to FO may alter seriously the composition of fish HK membranes(Reference Bell, McEvoy and Tocher25Reference Izquierdo, Obach and Arantzamendi28) and consequently modulate their response to stress(Reference Montero, Kalinowski and Obach31). It is clear that feeding these VO affected cortisol release in HK from gilthead sea bream, and this is mediated partly by the action of COX and LOX metabolites. Moreover, the presence of higher levels of C18 fatty acids in the HK from fish fed VO could activate other unknown pathways, and more studies are needed to clarify these mechanisms responsible for cortisol release in fish.

Acknowledgements

The present work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Sciences and Innovation as part of LINOSALUD project (AGL2004-08151-CO302). The experiments were designed according to the Animal Welfare Ethics Committee guidelines of Las Palmas University. R. G. carried out the animal experiment, performed the biochemical studies and cortisol analysis, participated in the interpretation of the results and drafted the manuscript. J. G. B. and D. M. participated in the design of the study and in the interpretation of the results. A. F. participated in the animal experiment design and provided the formulated animal diets. Y. V. and E. A. participated in the animal feeding and sampling. L. T. supervised the cortisol analysis and the result interpretation. M. S. I. conceived the study and its design, coordinated the work, and participated in the interpretation of the results and the preparation of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. There are no potential conflicts of interest.

References

1Watanabe, T, Tamiya, T, Oka, A, et al. (1983) Improvement of dietary value of live foods for fish larvae by feeding them on ω3 highly unsaturated fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins. Nippon Suisan Gakkai Shi 49, 471479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Watanabe, T, Kitajima, C & Fujita, S (1983) Nutritonal values of live organisms used in Japan for mass propagation of fish: a review. Aquaculture 34, 115143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Izquierdo, MS, Watanabe, T, Takeuchi, T, et al. (1989) Requirement of larval red seabream Pagrus major for essential fatty acids. Nippon Suisan Gakkai Shi 55, 859867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Izquierdo, MS (1996) Essential fatty acid requirements of cultured marine fish larvae. Aquac Nutr 2, 183191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Castell, JD, Bell, JG, Tocher, DR, et al. (1994) Effects of purified diets containing different combinations of arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid on survival, growth and fatty acid composition of juvenile turbot, Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture 128, 315333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bessonart, M, Izquierdo, MS, Salhi, M, et al. (1999) Effect of dietary arachidonic acid levels on growth and survival of gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata L. larvae. Aquaculture 179, 265275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Gurr, MI & Harwood, JL (1991) Lipid Biochemistry. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
8Sargent, JR, Bell, JG, Bell, MV, et al. (1993) The metabolism of phospholipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids in fish. In Aquaculture: Fundamental and Applied Research, Coastal and Estuarine Studies, 43rd ed., pp. 103124 [Lahlou, B and Vitello, P, editors]. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Montero, D, Tort, L, Izquierdo, MS, et al. (1998) Depletion of serum alternative complement pathway activity in gilthead seabream caused by α-tocopherol and n-3 HUFA dietary deficiencies. Fish Physiol Biochem 18, 399407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Pickering, AD & Pottinger, TG (1989) Stress responses and diseases response in salmonid fish: effects of chronic elevation of plasma cortisol. Fish Physiol Biochem 7, 253258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Donaldson, EM (1981) The pituitary–interrenal axis as an indicator of stress in fish. In Stress and Fish, pp. 1147 [Pickering, AD, editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
12Schreck, CB, Bradford, CS, Fitzpatrick, MS, et al. (1989) Regulation of the interrenal tissue of fishes: non-classical control mechanisms. Fish Physiol Biochem 7, 259265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Arnold-Reed, DE & Balment, RJ (1991) Atrial natriuetic factor stimulates in vivo and in vitro secretion of cortisol in teleosts. J Endocrinol 128, R17R20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Lamers, AE, Flik, G, Atsma, W, et al. (1992) A role for di-acetyl α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in the control of cortisol release in the teleost Oreochromis mossambicus. J Endocrinol 135, 285292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Patiño, R, Bradford, CS & Shreck, CB (1986) Adenylate cyclase activators and inhibitors, cyclic nucleotide analogs, and phosphatidylinositol: effects on interrenal function of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in vitro. Gen Comp Endocrinol 63, 230235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Schimmer, BP (1995) The 1994 Upjohn Award Lecture. Molecular and genetic approaches to the study of signal transduction in the adrenal cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73, 10971107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Kloas, W, Reinecke, M & Hanke, W (1994) Role of the atrial natriuretic peptide for adrenal regulation in the teleost fish Cyprinus carpio. Am J Physiol 267, R1034R1042.Google ScholarPubMed
18Bird, IM, Walker, SW & Williams, BC (1990) Agonist-stimulated turnover of the phosphoinositides and the regulation of adrenocortical steroidogenesis. J Mol Endocrinol 5, 191209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Lacroix, M & Hontela, A (2001) Regulation of acute cortisol synthesis by cAMP-dependant protein kinase and protein kinase C in teleost species, the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Endocrinol 169, 7178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Ganga, R, Tort, L, Acerete, L, et al. (2006) Modulation of ACTH-induced cortisol release by polyunsaturated fatty acids in interregnal cells from gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata. J Endocrinol 190, 3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Lands, WEM (1991) Biosynthesis of prostaglandins. Annu Rev Nutr 11, 4160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Nye, EJ, Hockings, GI, Grice, JE, et al. (1997) Aspirin inhibits vasopressin-induced hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal activity in normal humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82, 812817.Google ScholarPubMed
23Gupta, OP, Lahlou, B, Botella, J, et al. (1985) In vivo and in vitro studies on the release of cortisol from interrenal tissue in trout. I. Effects of ACTH and prostaglandins. Exp Biol 43, 201212.Google Scholar
24Torstensen, BE, Lie, O & Froyland, L (2000) Lipid metabolism and tissue composition in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) – effects of capelin oil, palm oil, and oleic acid-enriched sunflower oil as dietary lipid sources. Lipids 35, 653664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Bell, JG, McEvoy, J, Tocher, DR, et al. (2001) Replacement of fish oil with rapessed oil in diets of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) affects tissue lipid composition and hepatocyte fatty acid metabolism. J Nutr 131, 15351543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Bell, JG, Henderson, RJ, Tocher, DR, et al. (2002) Substituting fish oil with crude palm oil in the diet of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) affects tissue fatty acid compositions and hepatic fatty acid metabolism. J Nutr 132, 222230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Caballero, MJ, Obach, A, Rosenlund, G, et al. (2002) Impact of different dietary lipid sources on growth, lipid digestibility, tissue fatty acid composition and histology of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 214, 253271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Izquierdo, MS, Obach, A, Arantzamendi, L, et al. (2003) Dietary lipid sources for seabream and seabass: growth performance, tissue composition and flesh quality. Aquac Nutr 9, 397407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Izquierdo, MS, Montero, D, Robaina, L, et al. (2005) Alterations in fillet fatty acid profile and flesh quality in gilthead seabrem (Sparus aurata) fed vegetable oils for a long term period. Recovery of fatty acid profiles by fish oil feeding. Aquaculture 250, 431444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Montero, D, Robaina, L, Caballero, MJ, et al. (2005) Growth, feed utilization and flesh quality of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed diets containing vegetable oils. A time-course study on the effect of a re-feeding period with a 100 % fish oil. Aquaculture 248, 121134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Montero, D, Kalinowski, T, Obach, A, et al. (2003) Vegetable lipid sources for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata): effects on fish health. Aquaculture 225, 353370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Balfry, SK & Higgs, DA (2001) Influence of dietary lipid composition on the immune system and disease resistance of finfish. In Nutrition and Fish Health, pp. 213234 [Lim, C and Cheung, WY, editors]. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
33Tocher, DR, Bell, JG, Henderson, RJ, et al. (2000) The effect of dietary linseed and rapeseed oils on polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) undergoing parr-smolt transformation. Fish Physiol Biochem 23, 5973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Kalogeropoulos, N, Alexis, MN & Henderson, RJ (1992) Effect of dietary soybean and cod-liver oil levels on growth and body composition of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture 104, 293308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane-Stanley, GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Christie, WW (1982) Lipid Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
37Rotllant, J, Balm, PHM, Pérez-Sánchez, J, et al. (2001) Pituitary and interrenal function in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L., Teleosteí) after handling and confinement stress. Gen Comp Endocrinol 121, 333342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Rotllant, J, Balm, PHM, Ruane, NM, et al. (2000) Pituitary proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides and hypothalamic–pituitary–interrenal axis activity in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) during prolonged crowding stress: differential regulation of adrenocorticotropin hormone and melanocyte-stimulating hormone release by corticotrophin-releasing hormone and thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Gen Comp Endocrinol 119, 152163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Rotllant, J, Balm, PHM, Wendelaar Bonga, SE, et al. (2000) A drop in ambient temperature results in a transient reduction of interrenal ACTH responsiveness in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Physiol Biochem 23, 265273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Shahidi, F & Hong, C (1991) Role of metal ions and heme pigments in autoxidation of heat-processed meat products. Food Chem 42, 339346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Sokal, RR & Rolf, SJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics. In Biological Research, 3th ed., p. 419New York: WH Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
42Sargent, JR, Henderson, RJ & Tocher, DR (1989) The lipids. In Fish Nutrition, 2nd ed., pp. 153218 [Halver, JE, editor]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
43Henderson, RJ & Tocher, DR (1987) The lipid composition and biochemistry of freshwater fish. Prog Lipid Res 26, 281347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Bell, JG, Tocher, DR, Farndale, BM, et al. (1998) Growth, mortality, tissue histopathology and fatty acid compositions, eicosanoid production and response to stress, in juvenile turbot fed diets rich in gamma-linolenic acid in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 58, 353364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Waagbo, R, Sandnes, K, Jorgensen, J, et al. (1993) Health aspects of dietary lipid sources and vitamin E in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). II. Spleen and erythrocyte phospholipid fatty acid composition, nonspecific immunity and disease resistance. Fisk Dir Skr Ser Ernering 6, 6380.Google Scholar
46Sargent, JR, Tocher, DR & Bell, JG (2002) The lipids. In Fish Nutrition, 3th ed., pp. 181257 [Halver, JE and Hardy, RW, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
47Barton, BA & Iwama, GK (1991) Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids. Annu Rev Fish Dis 1, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Mommsen, TP, Vijayan, MM & Moon, TW (1999) Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanism of action and metabolic regulation. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9, 211268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Koven, WM, Barr, Y, Lutzky, S, et al. (2001) The effect of dietary arachidonic acid (20 : 4n-6) on growth, survival and resistance to handling stress in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) larvae. Aquaculture 193, 107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Koven, WM, Van Anholt, RD, Lutzky, S, et al. (2003) The effect of dietary arachidonic acid on growth, survival, and cortisol levels in different-age gilthead seabream larvae (Sparus aurata) exposed to handling of daily salinity change. Aquaculture 228, 307320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Van Anholt, RD, Spanings, FAT, Koven, WM, et al. (2004) Dietary supplementation with arachidonic acid in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) reveals physiological effects not mediated by prostaglandins. Gen Comp Endocrinol 139, 215226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Kanazawa, A (1997) Effects of docosahexaenoic acid and phospholipids on stress tolerance of fish. Aquaculture 155, 129134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Harel, M, Gavasso, S, Leshin, J, et al. (2001) The effect of tissue docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acids levels on hypersaline tolerance and leucocyte composition in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) larvae. Fish Physiol Biochem 24, 113123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Liu, J, Caballero, MJ, Izquierdo, M, et al. (2002) Necessity of dietary lecithin and eicosapentaenoic acid for growth, survival, stress resistance and lipoptotein formation in gilthead seabream Sparus aurata. Fish Sci 68, 11651172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Sumida, C (1995) Fatty acids: ancestral ligands and modern co-regulators of the steroid hormone receptor cell signalling pathway. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 52, 137144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Vallette, G, Sumida, C, Thobie, N, et al. (1995) Unsaturated fatty acids synergistically enhance glucocorticoid-induced gene expression. Cell Signal 7, 319323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Ballou, LR & Cheung, WY (1985) Inhibition of human platelet phospholipases A2 activity by unsaturated fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82, 371375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Sarel, I & Widmaier, EP (1995) Stimulation of steroidogenesis in cultured rat adrenocortical cells by unsaturated fatty acids. Am J Physiol 268, R1484R1490.Google ScholarPubMed
59Matthys, LA & Widmaier, EP (1998) Fatty acids inhibit adrenocorticotropin induced adrenal steroidogenesis. Horm Metab Res 30, 8083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Yehuda, S, Rabinovitz, S, Carasso, RL, et al. (2000) Fatty acid mixture counters changes in cortisol, cholesterol and impair learning. Int J Neurosci 101, 7387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Ando, H, Oka, M, Ichihashi, M, et al. (1990) Protein kinase C and linoleic acid-induced inhibition of melanogenesis. Pigment Cell Res 3, 200206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Spence, JD, Thornton, T, Muir, AD, et al. (2003) The effect of flax seed cultivars with differing content of α-linolenic acid and lignans on response to mental stress. J Am Coll Nutr 22, 494501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63Abou-Samra, AB, Catt, KJ & Aguilera, G (1986) Role of arachidonic acid in the regulation of adreno-corticotropin release from rat anterior pituitary cell cultures. Endocrinology 119, 14271431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Zacharieva, S, Borissova, AM, Andonova, K, et al. (1992) Role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-induced ACTH release in healthy men. Horm Metab Res 24, 336338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Nasushita, R, Watanobe, H & Takebe, K (1997) A comparative study of adrenocorticoropin-releasing activity of prostaglandins E1, E2, F and D2 in the rat. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 56, 165168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Bugajski, J, Gadek-Michalska, A & Bugajski, AJ (2001) A single corticosterone pre-treatment inhibits the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal responses to adrenergic and cholinergic stimulation. J Physiol Pharmacol 52, 313324.Google Scholar
67Gobbetti, A & Zerani, M (1993) Prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin F2 alpha involvement in the corticosterone and cortisol release by the female frog, Rana esculenta, during ovulation. J Exp Zool 267, 164170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68Vakharia, K & Hinson, JP (2005) Lipopolysacharide directly stimulates cortisol secretion by human adrenal cells by a cyclooxygenase-dependent mechanism. Endocrinology 146, 13981402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69Ganga, R, Bell, JG, Montero, D, et al. (2005) Effect of dietary lipids on plasma fatty acid profiles and prostaglandin and leptin production in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 142, 410418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70Won, JGS & Orth, DN (1994) Role of lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid in the regulation of adrenocorticotropin secretion by perfused rat anterior pituitary cells. Endocrinology 135, 14961503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71Wang, H, Walker, SW, Mason, JI, et al. (2000) Role of arachidonic acid metabolism in ACTH-stimulated cortisol secretion by bovine adrenocortical cells. Endocr Res 26, 705709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72Yamazaki, T, Higuchi, K, Kominami, S, et al. (2001) 15-Lipoxygenase metabolite(s) of arachidonic acid mediates adrenocorticotropin action in bovine adrenal steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 137, 26702675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73Michl, P, Beikler, T, Engelhardt, D, et al. (2000) Interleukin-3 and Interleukin-6 stimulate bovine adrenal cortisol secretion through different pathways. J Neuroendocrinol 12, 2328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Cowell, AM, Flower, RJ & Buckingham, JC (1991) Studies on the roles of phospholipase A2 and eicosanoids in the regulation of corticotrophin secretion by rat pituitary cells in vitro. J Endocrinol 130, 2132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Fatty acid profile of the experimental diets (% total identified fatty acids)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Concentration (% total fatty acids) of 18 : 2n-6, 18 : 3n-3, 18 : 1n-9, 20 : 4n-6, 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3 in the head kidney of sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed either a fish oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) diet for 26 weeks. Values are means. a,b,c,d,e Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. , FO; , 70LO; , 100LO; ■, 70SO; , 100SO.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed either fish oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation. a,b,c Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■- -, FO; –▲–, 70LO; –■–, 100LO; - -●- -, 70SO; , 100SO.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Cortisol stimulation factor (SF) in head kidney of sea bream fed either fish oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) or soyabean oil (SO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed fish oil (FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, FO; - -●- -, FO+INDO; –▲- -, FO+NDGA.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 70 linseed oil (70LO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, 70LO; - -●- -, 70LO+INDO; –▲- -, 70LO+NDGA; …, FO.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 100 linseed oil (100LO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, 100LO; - -●- -, 100LO+INDO;–▲- -, 100LO+NDGA; …, FO.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 70 soyabean oil (70SO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). –■–, 70SO; - -●- -, 70SO+INDO; –▲- -, 70SO+NDGA; …, FO.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Absolute cortisol secretion (ng/g head kidney per h) by head kidney of sea bream fed 100 soyabean oil (100SO) diet in comparison to the control diet (fish oil, FO) after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). a,b Mean values at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05), n 8. –■–, 100SO; - -●- -, 100SO+INDO; –▲- -, 100SO+NDGA; —, FO.

Figure 9

Fig. 9 Cortisol stimulation factor (SF) in head kidney of sea bream fed different diets after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation following incubation with either indomethacin (INDO) or nordihydroguaiaretic (NDGA) acid. a,b Mean values with unlike letters for each dietary treatment indicate significant difference due to INDO or NDGA addition (P < 0·05), n 8. ■, Control; , INDO; , NDGA.