Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:15:06.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the ileal and faecal digestibility of dietary amino acids in adult humans and evaluation of the pig as a model animal for digestion studies in man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Angela M. Rowan ,
P. J. Moughan ,
M. N. Wilson ,
K. Maher  and
C. Tasman-Jones
Angela M. Rowan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Massey University, Palmerston North. New Zealand
P. J. Moughan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North. New Zealand
M. N. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Massey University, Palmerston North. New Zealand
K. Maher
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Auckland University, New Zealand
C. Tasman-Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Auckland University, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of the study was to determine if there is a difference between ileal and faecal assays for determining amino acid and N digestibilities in adult human subjects. Comparison of true ileal amino acid and N digestibilities was also made between adult human subjects and growing pigs to establish the usefulness of the pig as a model animal. Five subjects with established ileostomies and six subjects with intact large bowels consumed a constant diet consisting of meat, vegetables, fruit, bread and dairy products for 7 d with collection of ileostomy contents or faeces respectively over the last 4 d. The study was repeated using 25 kg body weight ileostomized and intact pigs. Apparent amino acid and N digestibility coefficients were determined. For human subjects the faecal digestibility values were significantly higher (P < 0·05) than the ileal values for Arg, Asp, Gly, Phe, Pro, Ser, Thr and Trp. The faecal digestibility of Met was significantly lower than the ileal value. Determination of DNA, diaminopimelic acid (DAPA) and the digestibilities of pectin, hemicellulose and cellulose in human subjects indicated that some microbial colonization had occurred at the terminal ileum after formation of an ileostomy; however, this was not as extensive as in the large intestine. True ileal amino acid and N digestibilities were calculated after correcting for the endogenous contribution of amino acids at the terminal ileum determined using a protein-free diet. There were no significant differences between adult human subjects and pigs for true ileal dietary amino acid digestibility except for Thr, Phe, Cys and Met. There were no significant differences between adult humans and pigs for the ileal digestibility of dry matter and the faecal digestibility of gross energy.

Keywords

Amino acid digestibilityPigMan
Type
Amino acid digestion in the pig and adult human
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

REFERENCES

Brooke, B. N. (1952). The management of an ileostomy including its complications. Lancet ii, 102–104.Google Scholar
Brooke, B. N. (1969). In Operative Surgery, Vol. 5, pp. 515–521 [Rob, C., R., Smith and Morgan, C. N., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Chacko, A. & Cummings, J. H. (1988). Nitrogen losses from the human small bowel: obligatory losses and th effect of physical form of food. Gut 29, 809–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. H. & Englyst, H. N. (1987). Fermentation in the human large intestine and the available substrates. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45, 1243–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, H. W. (1982). Physiology of the Digestive Tract. Chicago and London: Yearbook Medical Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Dillard, R. L., Eastman, H. & Fordtran, J. S. (1965). Volume-flow relationship during the transport of fluid through the human small intestine. Gastroenterology 49, 58–66.Google Scholar
Dodds, W. J. (1982). The pig model for biomedical research. Federation Proceedings 41, 247–256.Google Scholar
Dowsett, J., Gibney, M. J. & Kennedy, N. P. (1990). Bacterial fermentation occurs in the terminal ileum of ileostomates. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 49, 110A.Google Scholar
Drasar, B. S. & Hill, M. J. (1974). Human Intestinal Flora. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Englyst, H. N. & Cummings, J. H. (1984). Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109, 937–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englyst, H. N. & Hudson, G. J. (1987). Colorimetric method for routine measurement of dietary fibre as non-starch polysaccharides. A comparison with gas-liquid chromatography. Food Chemistry 24, 63–67.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (1990). Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Protein Quality Evaluation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Fleming, S. E. & Wasilewski, M. M. (1984). Using the pig as a tool for studying fermentation in the gut. Nutrition Reports International 30, 825–834.Google Scholar
Forsum, E., Goranzon, H., Rundgren, M., Thilen, M. & Hambraeus, L. (1981). Protein evaluation ofmixed diets. Comparative study in man and the pig and rat of vegetable-animal and vegetable protein diets. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 25, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. A., Sladen, G. E. & Dawson, A. M. (1976). Protein absorption and ammonia production: the effects of dietary protein and removal of the colon. British Journal of Nutrition 35, 61–65.Google Scholar
Giles, K. W. & Myers, A. (1965). An improved diphenylamine method for the estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 206, 93.Google Scholar
Gorbach, S. L., Nahas, L., Weinstein, L., Levitan, R. & Patterson, J. F. (1967). Studies of intestinal microflora. IV. The microflora of ileostomy effluent: a unique microbial ecology. Gastroenterology 53, 874–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilloteau, P., Patureau-Mirand, P., Toullec, R. & Prugnard, J. (1980). Digestion of milk protein and methanol-grown bacterial protein in the preruminant calf. 2. Amino acid composition of ileal digesta and faeces and blood levels of free amino acids Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 20, 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilloteau, P., Toullec, R., Grongnet, J. F., Patureau-Mirand, P., Prugnard, J. & Sauvant, D. (1986). Digestion of milk, fish, soya-bean protein in the pre-ruminant calf: flow of digesta, apparent digestibility at the end of the ileum and amino acid composition of ileal digesta. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 571–592.Google Scholar
Hiller, A., Plazin, J. & Van Slyke, D. D. (1948). A study of conditions for kjeldahl determination of nitrogen in proteins. Description of methods with mercury as catalyst and titrimetric and gasometric measurements of the ammonia formed. Journal of Biological Chemistry 176, 1401–1420.Google Scholar
Holloway, W. D., Tasman-Jones, C. & Bell, E. (1980). The hemicellulose component of dietary fibre in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 260–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, W. D., Tasman-Jones, C. & Lee, S. P. (1978). Digestion of certain fractions of dietary fibre in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, 927–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, W. D., Tasman-Jones, C. & Maher, K. (1983). Pectin digestion in humans. American Journal of Clinica1 Nutrition 37, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Istfan, N., Murray, E., Tanghorbani, M. & Young, V. R. (1983). An evaluation of the nutritional value of a soy protein concentrate in young adult men using the short-term N-balance method. Journal of Nutrition 113, 2516–2523.Google Scholar
Just, A. (1980) In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in the Pig, pp. 66 75 [Low, A. G. and Partridge, I. G., editors]. Reading: NIRD.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. (1980). Nutrient absorption in pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 1087–1130.Google Scholar
McNeil, N. I. (1988). Nutritional implications of human and mammalian large intestinal function. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 56, 1–42,Google Scholar
Mason, V. C., Just, A. & Bech-Andersen, S. (1976). Bacterial activity in the hind-gut of pigs. 2. Its influence on the apparent digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernahrung and Futtermittelkunde 36, 310–324.Google Scholar
Miller, E. R. & Ullrey, D. E. (1987). The pig as a model for human nutrition. Annual Reviews of Nutrition 7, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for the determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry 31, 426–428.Google Scholar
Moore, S. (1963). The determination of cystine as cysteic acid. Journal of Biological Chemistry 238, 235–237.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J. & Rowan, A. M. (1989). The pig as a model animal for human nutrition research. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of New Zealand 14, 116–124.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgdte, D. A. T. (1978). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, pp. 1–418. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Payne, W. L., Combs, G. F., Kifer, R. R. & Snyder, D. G. (1968). Investigation of protein quality -ileal recovery of amino acids. Federation Proceedings 27, 1199–1203.Google ScholarPubMed
Pond, W. G. & Houpt, K. A. (1978). The Biology of the Pig. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Rerat, A. (1981). Digestion and absorption of nutrients in the pig. Some new data concerning protein and carbohydrates. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 37, 229–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rerat, A. (1984). In Function and Dysfunction of the Small Intestine. Proceedings of the 2nd George Durrant Memorial Symposium, p. 22. [Batt, R. M. and Lawrence, T. L. J., editors]. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Rowan, A. M. (1989). A study of the digestion of protein in humans using ileal and faecal assays. MSc Thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Rowan, A. M., Moughan, P. J. & Wilson, M. N. (1989). Alkaline hydrolysis for the determination of tryptophan in biological samples. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of New Zealand 14, 169–172.Google Scholar
Rowan, A. M., Moughan, P. J. & Wilson, M. N. (1992). Effect of hydrolysis time on the determination of the amino acid composition of diet, ileal digesta, and feces samples and on the determination of dietary amino acid digestibility coefficients. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40, 981–985.Google Scholar
Rowan, A. M., Moughan, P. J. & Wilson, M. N. (1993). Endogenous amino acid flow at the terminal ileum of adult humans determined following the ingestion of a single protein-free meal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 61, 439–442.Google Scholar
Russell, C. A., Evans, S. J. & Mabbutt, C. (1984). A comparison of the absorption of nitrogen from ‘chemically-defined elemental’ or ‘whole-protein’ enteral feeds by the human small bowel. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 123A.Google Scholar
Salter, D. N. & Coates, M. E. (1971). The influence of the microflora of the alimentary tract on protein digestion in the chick. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 55–61.Google Scholar
Sandberg, A., Anderson, H., Hallgren, B., Hasselblad, K., Isaksson, B. & Hulten, L. (1981). Experimental model for in vivo determination of dietary fibre and its effects on the absorption of nutrients in the small intestine. British Journal of Nutrition 45, 283–294.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, B., Anderson, H., Kivisto, B. & Sandberg, A. S. (1986). Apparent small intestinal absorption of nitrogen and minerals from soy and meat-protein based diets. Journal of Nutrition 116, 2209–2218.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Just, A., Jorgensen, H. H., Fekadu, M. & Eggum, B. O. (1980). The influence of diet composition on the apparent digestibility of crude protein and amino acids at the terminal ileum and overall in pigs. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica 30, 449–459.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. C. & Ozimek, L. (1986). Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. & Thannhauser, S. J. (1945). A method for the determination of deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid, and phosphoproteins in animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 161, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrimshaw, N. S., Wayler, A. H., Murray, E., Steinke, F. H., Rand, W. M. & Young, V. R. (1983). Nitrogen balance in young men given one of two isolated soy proteins or milk protein. Journal of Nutrition 113, 2492–2497.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1982). Statistical Methods. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1981). In The Analysis of Dietary Fibre in Foods, pp. 1–21 [James, W. P. T. and Theander, O., editors]. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Vince, A., O'Grady, F. & Dawson, A. M. (1973). The development of ileostomy flora. Journal of Infectious Diseases 128, 638–641.Google Scholar
Wayler, A., Queiroz, E., Schrimshaw, N. S., Steinke, F. H., Rand, W. M. & Young, V. R. (1983). Nitrogen balance studies in young men to assess the protein quality of an isolated soy protein in relation to meat proteins. Journal of Nutrition 113, 2485–2491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiles, S. J., Nettleton, P. A., Black, A. E. & Paul, A. A. (1980). The nutrient composition of some cooked dishes eaten in Britain: A supplementary food composition table. Journal of Human Nutrition 34, 189–223.Google Scholar
Young, V. R., Puig, M., Queiroz, E., Schrimshaw, N. S. & Rand, W. M. (1984). Evaluation of the protein quality of an isolated soy protein in young men: relative nitrogen requirements and effect of methionine supplementation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 39, 1624.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T. (1973). Influence of dietary protein source on the rate of digestion in the small intestine of pigs. Part II. The rate of protein digestion and amino acid absorption. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych B 95, 135–155.Google Scholar