Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:09:41.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food photography II: use of food photographs for estimating portion size and the nutrient content of meals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Nelson ,
M. Atkinson  and
S. Darbyshire
M. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, Campden Hill Road, London W8 7AH
M. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, Campden Hill Road, London W8 7AH
S. Darbyshire
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, Campden Hill Road, London W8 7AH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of the present study was to determine the errors in the conceptualization of portion size using photographs. Male and female volunteers aged 18–90 years (n 136) from a wide variety of social and occupational backgrounds completed 602 assessments of portion size in relation to food photographs. Subjects served themselves between four and six foods at one meal (breakfast, lunch or dinner). Portion sizes were weighed by the investigators at the time of serving, and any waste was weighed at the end of the meal. Within 5 min of the end of the meal, subjects were shown photographs depicting each of the foods just consumed. For each food there were eight photographs showing portion sizes in equal increments from the 5th to the 95th centile of the distribution of portion weights observed in The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults (Gregory et al. 1990). Subjects were asked to indicate on a visual analogue scale the size of the portion consumed in relation to the eight photographs. The nutrient contents of meals were estimated from food composition tables. There were large variations in the estimation of portion sizes from photographs. Butter and margarine portion sizes tended to be substantially overestimated. In general, small portion sizes tended to be overestimated, and large portion sizes underestimated. Older subjects overestimated portion size more often than younger subjects. Excluding butter and margarine, the nutrient content of meals based on estimated portion sizes was on average within± 7% of the nutrient content based on the amounts consumed, except for vitamin C (21% overestimate), and for subjects over 65 years (15–20% overestimate for energy and fat). In subjects whose BMI was less than 25 kg/m2, the energy and fat contents of meals calculated from food composition tables and based on estimated portion size (excluding butter and margarine) were 5–10% greater than the nutrient content calculated using actual portion size, but for those with BMI 30 kg/m2or over, the calculated energy and fat contents were underestimated by 2–5% The correlation of the nutrient content of meals based on actual or estimated portion sizes ranged from 0·84 to 0·96. For energy and eight nutrients, between 69 and 89% subjects were correctly classified into thirds of the distribution of intake using estimated portion size compared with intakes based on actual portion sizes. When ‘average’ portion sizes (the average weight of each of the foods which the subjects had served themselves)were used in place of the estimates based on photographs, the number of subjects correctly classified fell to between 60 and 79%. We report for the first time the error associated with conceptualization and the nutrient content of meals when using photographs to estimate food portion size. We conclude that photographs depicting a range of portion sizes are a useful aid to the estimation of portion size. Misclassification of subjects according to their nutrient intake from one meal is reduced when photographs are used to estimate portion size, compared with the use of average portions. Age, sex, BMI and portion size are all potentially important confounders when estimating food consumptionor nutrient intake using photographs

Keywords

Food photographySurvey methodologyEpidemiology
Type
Human and Clinical Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , July 1996 , pp. 31 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1996

References

REFERENCES

Byers, T., Marshall, J., Fiedler, R., Zielezny, M. & Graham, S. (1985). Assessing nutrient intake with an abbreviated dietary interview. American Journal of Epldemiology 122, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, S. Y., Kolonel, L. N., Hankin, J. H. &Lee, J. (1984). A comparison of frequency and quantitative dietary methods for epidemiologic studies of diet and disease. American Journal of Epidemiology,119, 323–333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edington, J., Thorogood, M., Geekie, M., Ball, M. & Mann, J. (1989). Assessment of nutritional intake using dietary records with estimated weights. Journal of Human Nitrition and Dietetics, 2, 407–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faggiano, F., Vineis, P., Cravanzola, D., Pisani, P., Xompero, G., Riboli, E. & Kaaks, R. (1992). Validation of a method for the estimation of food portion size. Epidemiology,3, 379–382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskell, G., Wright, D. & O'Muircheartaigh, C. (1993). Reliability of surveys. Psychologist November, 500–503.Google Scholar
Gregory, J., Foster, K., Tyler, H. &Wiseman, M. (1990). The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Guthrie, H. A. (1984). Selection and quantification of typical food portions by young adults. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 12, 1440–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankin, J. H., Wilkins, L. R., Kolonel, L. N. & Yoshizawa, C. N. (1991). Validation of a quantitative diet history method in Hawaii. American Journal of Epidemiology, 133, 616–628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haraldsdottir, J., Tjørnneland, A. & Overvad, K. (1994). Validity of individual portion size estimates in a food frequency questionnaire. International Journal of Epidemiology 23,787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B., Unwin, I. D. & Buss, D. H. (1988). Cereals and Cereal Products. Third Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of ChemistryGoogle Scholar
Holland, B., Unwin, I. D. &Buss, D. H. (1989). Milk Products and Eggs. Fourth Supplement to McCance and Widdowon's The Compostion of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of ChemistryGoogle Scholar
Holland, B., Unwin, I. D. & Buss, D. H. (1991 a). Vegetables, Herbs and Spices. Fifth Supplement to McCance and Widdowon's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of ChemistryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B., Unwin, I. D. & Buss, D. H. (1992 a). Fruit and Nuts. First Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Compositon of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of ChemistryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B., Welch, A. A. & Buss, D. H. (1992 b). Vegetable Dishes. Second Supplement to McCance and Widdowon's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of ChemistryGoogle Scholar
Holland, B., Welch, A. A., Unwin, I. D., Buss, D. H., Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1991 b). McCance and Widdowons's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Combridge: Royal Society of ChemistryGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. & Cunningham, K. (1990). Irish National Nutrition Survey. Dublin: Irish Nutrition and Dietetics Institute.Google Scholar
Morgan, S., Flint, D. M., Prinsley, M. L., Wahlqvist, M. L. & Parish, A. E. (1982). Measurement of food intake in the elderly by food photography. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 7, 172.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (1991). The validation of dietary questionnaires. In Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology, pp.266–296 [Margetts, B. M. & Nelson, M., editors]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, M., Atkinson, M. & Darbyshire, S. (1994). Food photography I: the perception of food portion size from Photographs. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 649–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietinen, P., Hartman, A. M., Haapa, E., Rasanen, L., Haapakoski, J., Palmgren, J., Albanes, D., Virtamo, J. &Huttunen, J. K. (1988 a). Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. American Journal of Epidemiology 128, 655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietinen, P., Hartman, A. M., Haapa, E., Rasanen, L., Haapakoski, J., Palmgren, J., Albanes, D,Virtamo, J. &Huttunen, J. K. (1988 b). Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. II. A qualitative food frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology 128, 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutishauser, I. H. E. (1982). Food models, photographs or household measures? Proceedings of the Nutrition, Society of Australia 7, 144–145.Google Scholar
Samet, J. M., Humble, C. G.,&Skipper, B. E. (1984). Alternatives in the collection and analysis of food frequency interview data. American Journal of Epidemiology 120, 572–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, S. P., Wenlock, R. W. & Buss, D. H. (1985). Immigrant Foods. Second Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Tjønneland, A., Overvad, K., Haraldsdottir, J., Band, S., Ewertz, M. & Jenson, O. M. (1991). Validation of asemi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire developed in Denmark. Internarional Journd of Epidemiology 20, 906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed