Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:09:15.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of dietary protein on lipid metabolism in hamsters is source-dependent and associated with changes in hepatic gene expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2008

Alfred Aziz
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, PL 2203E, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, OttawaK1A 0K9, ON, Canada
Chao Wu Xiao
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, PL 2203E, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, OttawaK1A 0K9, ON, Canada
Kevin A. Cockell
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, PL 2203E, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, OttawaK1A 0K9, ON, Canada
G. Sarwar Gilani
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, PL 2203E, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, OttawaK1A 0K9, ON, Canada
Cristina Cruz-Hernandez
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, PL 2203E, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, OttawaK1A 0K9, ON, Canada
W. M. Nimal Ratnayake*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, PL 2203E, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, OttawaK1A 0K9, ON, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Dr W. M. Nimal Ratnayake, fax +1 613 941 6182, email nimal_ratnayake@hc-sc.gc.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that protein source is a factor determining the impact of the diet on lipid metabolism in hamsters. Twenty-eight hamsters of similar body weight were assigned for a period of 8 weeks to one of the following four diets (seven per group) containing either 20 % (w/w) casein (CAS), beef protein (BF), wheat gluten (WG) or soya protein (SOY). The fat composition of the diet was the same (15·5 % w/w) in all groups and provided SFA, MUFA and PUFA representative of the average Canadian diet. After an overnight fast, blood and liver were collected for the measurement of serum lipids, fatty acid composition of liver phospholipids and mRNA levels of selected genes involved in lipid metabolism. WG resulted in lower total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol but, along with SOY, in higher mRNA levels of cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase and LDL receptor. Furthermore, both WG and SOY resulted in lower 18 : 3n-3, 20 : 4n-6, total n-6 PUFA, 18 : 1n-9 and total MUFA, but higher 22 : 6n-3, total n-3 PUFA, 22 : 6n-3/18 : 3n-3 and 22 : 5n-3/18 : 3n-3 ratios in liver phospholipids, and higher hepatic Δ6-desaturase mRNA levels. These results show that the impact of dietary protein on lipid metabolism is source-dependent and associated with changes in mRNA abundances of key hepatic enzymes and receptors.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

CVD are the leading causes of death in Canada(Reference Manuel, Leung, Nguyen, Tanuseputro and Johansen1) and incur tremendous costs for the Canadian health care system(Reference Smith2). Therefore, primary prevention is the ultimate strategy warranted to reduce the rate of mortality from CVD and alleviate the economic burden of its morbidities. Defective lipid metabolism is a cluster of modifiable risk factors for CVD, including hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C)), hypertriacylglycerolaemia and low circulating concentrations of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), that can be corrected by diet.

The impact of the three classes of macronutrients on lipid metabolism has been investigated to various degrees, with that of dietary fats and cholesterol receiving the greatest attention(Reference Lichtenstein3). Recent years have witnessed a surge in the popularity of high-protein diets for the management of body weight in obesity(Reference Anderson, Konz and Jenkins4). These diets were shown to be effective not only in inducing weight loss(Reference Krieger, Sitren, Daniels and Langkamp-Henken5), but also in improving lipid profile and reducing CVD risk(Reference Hu6). However, these and other effects appear to be dependent on the source of protein(Reference Anderson and Moore7, Reference Aziz, Anderson, Giacca and Cho8). It is generally agreed that vegetable protein decreases circulating cholesterol concentrations compared to animal protein(Reference Kritchevsky9, Reference Anderson, Johnstone and Cook-Newell10).

The limitations of most of these studies are the comparison of the effects of only two sources of protein at a time on lipid indices, the use of an animal model whose lipid metabolism in response to diet differs from that of man, and large variations in the quantity and quality of dietary lipids. The majority of studies compared the effects of soya protein (SOY) and casein (CAS)(Reference Anderson, Johnstone and Cook-Newell10, Reference Carroll and Kurowska11). However, wheat gluten (WG) was also found to be hypocholesterolaemic compared to CAS(Reference Bassat and Mokady12, Reference Endo, Fu, Abe, Arai and Kato13). When more than two dietary groups were included, the limiting amino acid was added to the investigated protein in an attempt to provide a mechanistic explanation for the observed effects. For example, the limiting amino acids lysine+threonine and methionine were added to WG and SOY, respectively, to elucidate their role in cholesterol and long-chain PUFA metabolism(Reference Shimada, Morita and Sugiyama14, Reference Sugiyama, Ohkawa and Muramatsu15).

In addition, it is imperative to use an animal model whose lipid metabolism in response to dietary nutrients closely mimics that of man. The hamster, in opposition to the rat, is a valid model for this purpose(Reference Spady and Dietschy16), especially in light of the high content of fat in human diets in comparison with commonly used rodent diets (see Materials and methods section and Table 1). Last but not least, because lipid metabolism is primarily determined by the amount and type of dietary fats, it is important to investigate the effect of protein source under conditions that reflect habitual fat intakes, in this case under fatty acid intakes that are representative of the Canadian diet(Reference Mendelson, Tarasuk, Chappell, Brown and Anderson17) (see Materials and methods section and Table 2). However, dietary cholesterol was not added to the diets in the present study because it strongly impacts hepatic cholesterol and LDL-C metabolism in a dose-dependent manner in the hamster(Reference Spady and Dietschy18), but not in man(Reference Jones19); and because it modulates the expression of genes and/or activity of enzymes involved in lipid metabolism(Reference Shimomura, Bashmakov, Shimano, Horton, Goldstein and Brown20) to an extent that might mask the effect of dietary protein on such indices. Although humans consume protein from different sources and the impact of diet on lipid metabolism is modulated by several nutrients, elucidating the effects of individual nutritional factors, in this case protein, will help develop dietary strategies aiming at optimizing or improving cardiovascular health.

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets (g/kg)

BF, beef protein; CAS, casein; SOY, soya protein; WG, wheat gluten.

* Harlan Teklad (Madison, WI, USA): vitamin-free CAS and isolated SOY.

Extra lean ground beef (local butcher, Gatineau, QC, Canada), defatted and freeze-dried.

Dyets Inc. (Bethlehem, PA, USA).

§ Provided as 20 % (w/w) actual protein content, as per manufacturer's powder composition sheet for CAS, WG and SOY, and based on nitrogen content of BF by micro-Kjeldahl method.

Lantic Ltd (Montreal, QC, Canada).

Consisting of low-erucid acid rapeseed oil (50 %), coconut oil (28 %), lard (12 %), soyabean oil (5 %), butter (5 %) and flaxseed oil (1 %).

** Energy was calculated by adding the energy contributed from protein (CAS and BF = 15·07 kJ/g; WG = 15·36 kJ/g; SOY = 16·24 kJ/g), carbohydrate (starch and sucrose = 16·74 kJ/g), fat (fat blend = 37·68 kJ/g) and wheat bran (9·40 kJ/g).

Table 2 Fatty acid (FA) composition of the experimental diets (% of total FA)*

BF, beef protein; CAS, casein; SOY, soya protein; WG, wheat gluten.

* See Materials and methods section for details of lipid extraction and analysis.

Fat blend consisted of low-erucid acid rapeseed oil (50 %), coconut oil (28 %), lard (12 %), soyabean oil (5 %), butter (5 %) and flaxseed oil (1 %).

Therefore, the objective of the present study was to compare systematically the effect of four different un-supplemented proteins of both animal and vegetable sources on plasma lipids, long-chain fatty acid metabolism in the liver, and expression of genes involved in hepatic lipid metabolism in hamsters fed cholesterol-free diets.

Materials and methods

Animals and diets

The Health Canada Animal Care Committee approved the animal experimental protocol, and maintenance of the animals followed the guidelines of the Canadian Council for Animal Care. Male golden Syrian hamsters (n 28; age 30–33 d) were purchased from Charles River (St-Constant, QC, Canada). Upon arrival, they were housed individually in ventilated plastic transparent cages with bedding in a climate-controlled environment maintained at a temperature of 22 ± 1°C and 60 % relative humidity with a 12:12 h light–dark cycle. After a week of acclimation during which a commercial rodent feed (Purina chow # 5001) was provided, the hamsters (seven per group; average body weight 84 g) were given free access to one of the four experimental diets :  CAS, beef protein (BF), WG and SOY (Table 1). The diets were formulated based on a modification of the Hayes Purified Diet for Hamsters(Reference Hayes, Stephan, Pronczuk, Lindsey and Verdon21). Dietary protein accounted for 20 % (w/w) based on pure protein content (as per manufacturer's sheet composition for CAS, WG and SOY, and based on nitrogen content of BF by micro-Kjeldahl method). Extra lean ground beef was purchased from a local butcher (Gatineau, QC, Canada), defatted, freeze-dried and pulverized into a powdered form before mixing it with other ingredients in the diet.

Dietary fat accounted for 15·5 % (w/w) of the total diet (Table 1) and consisted of a blend of rapeseed oil (50 %), coconut oil (28 %), lard (12 %), soyabean oil (5 %), butter (5 %) and flaxseed oil (1 %). This fat blend was chosen to provide SFA, MUFA and PUFA at levels similar to those estimated for the average Canadian diet(Reference Mendelson, Tarasuk, Chappell, Brown and Anderson17). Lard and butter did not contribute significantly to the cholesterol content of the diet (approximately 0·003 %). Total nitrogen in proteins and diets was determined (in duplicate) by the micro-Kjeldahl method using a Kjeltec Auto 2400 Analyser (Höganäs, Sweden). Protein was calculated using a nitrogen-to-protein ratio factor of 6·25. Diets were hydrolysed (in duplicate) with 6 m-HCl at 110°C for 22 h for the determination of total amino acids except sulphur amino acids and tryptophan(22). Hydrolysates for the determination of methionine as methionine sulphone and cyste(i)ne as cysteic acid were prepared by performic acid oxidation of protein followed by hydrolysis with 6 m-HCl(22). All amino acids, except tryptophan, in hydrolysates were determined by liquid chromatography of precolumn phenylisothiocyanate derivatives(Reference Sarwar, Botting and Peace23) using Waters 600 Controller with Waters 717plus Autosampler and Waters 996 Photoiode Array Detector (254 nm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) (Table 3). The fatty acid composition of the diet (Table 2) was determined as described later.

Table 3 Amino acid composition of the experimental diets (g/100 g protein)*

BF, beef protein; CAS, casein; SOY, soya protein; WG, wheat gluten.

* Amino acid composition of the diets was determined according to the method developed by Sarwar et al. (Reference Sarwar, Botting and Peace23).

Procedures

Fresh food was provided and measurements of food intake and body weight were taken twice a week. On these same days, cages were changed and fresh bedding was provided, spiked with a small amount of the old bedding from the same cage to minimize variation in the surroundings. Hamsters had unlimited access to food and water during the entire experimental phase. At the end of the eighth week, the animals were fasted for at least 16 h prior to killing by exsanguination through cardiac puncture under general anaesthesia with isoflurane. Blood was collected in serum separator tubes gel and clot activator tubes and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min at 4°C to obtain serum for the analysis of lipids. The liver was removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80°C until analysis.

Serum lipids

Serum TAG, TC and HDL-C were measured using a microplate enzymatic colorimetric method (Randox Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada; catalogue numbers TR 201, CH 201 and CH 204, respectively) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Non-HDL-C was determined by subtracting HDL-C from TC.

Fatty acid composition of diets and liver phospholipids

Total lipids were extracted from diets and livers with chloroform–methanol–water (2:2:1·8, by vol.)(Reference Bligh and Dyer24). Phospholipids (PL) from liver total lipids were separated and isolated by TLC with development in hexane–diethyl ether–acetic acid (85:15:1, by vol.). Lipids from the diets and liver PL were then transmethylated with 0·5 m-methanolic HCl. The fatty acid methyl esters were analysed by GC with a flame ionization decay detector and auto-sampler (Agilent Technologies 6890N) using a Supelcowax-10 flexible fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0·25 mm × 0·25 μm, Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). The fatty acids were identified by comparing their retention times with those of a standard mixture of fatty acid methyl esters (Supelco 37 FAME catalogue number 47 885-U; Supelco Inc.). The fatty acids were expressed as % of total fatty acids.

Quantitation of mRNA abundances of selected hepatic enzymes and receptors involved in lipid metabolism

Total RNA was isolated from hamster liver samples with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Canada Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed with M-MLV RT (Invitrogen Canada Inc.) for cDNA synthesis. One-tenth of the synthesized cDNA was then amplified using Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) with the primers listed in Table 4 for the following genes :  LDL-R, scavenger receptor B1 (SR-B1), also known as HDL receptor, cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoAr), lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase, Δ6-desaturase, Δ5-desaturase (Invitrogen Canada Inc.), and universal 18S rRNA primers and competimers (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA). PCR conditions were 94°C for 5 min, 94°C for 30 s, annealing temperature (Table 4), 72°C for 30 s and 72°C for 10 min. The annealing temperatures, ratios of 18S rRNA primer–competimer and amplification cycle numbers for each gene were optimized to ensure that the amplifications were in the linear range. Samples were resolved on pre-cast 2 % agarose gels in the presence if ethidium bromide (Invitrogen Canada Inc.). Multiple images of each gel were taken with different exposure time using the BioDoc-It Imaging System (UVP Inc., Upland, CA, USA). Densities of the appropriate images were measured using the Scion Image software, and mRNA abundances of each gene were normalized against their respective 18S rRNA content, which was not affected by our treatments (data not shown).

Table 4 Oligonucleotide sequence for reverse transcription and RT–PCR

CYP7A1, cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase; Δ5D, Δ5-desaturase; Δ6D, Δ6-desaturase; HMG-CoAr, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; LCAT, lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase; LDL-R, LDL receptor; P:C, primer:competimer; SR-B1, scavenger receptor B1; Temp., annealing temperature.

* All primers listed in the table were purchased from Invitrogen Canada Inc. (Burlington, ON, Canada).

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA. If significance was observed (P ≤ 0·05), Duncan's multiple range test was used to identify differences in the effect of individual diets. This post hoc test was used instead of the more rigid Tukey's honest significant differences because of the relatively small sample size and the large variability within dietary groups. Statistica 7 for Windows 2000 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used in all analyses. All data are expressed as means and their standard errors.

Results

Food intake and body weight

There were no significant differences in average food intake per day (P = 0·14), body weight at the end of the study (P = 0·94) and body weight gain (P = 0·94) of hamsters during the feeding phase among the four dietary protein groups (Table 5).

Table 5 Food intake, body weight and plasma lipid concentrations of hamsters fed one of the four different sources of protein in their diets for 8 weeks

(Mean values with their standard errors for seven hamsters per group)

BF, beef protein; CAS, casein; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; SOY, soya protein; TC, total cholesterol; WG, wheat gluten.

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Food intake is the average intake per day over 8 weeks.

Body weight at the end of the 8-week feeding period.

Serum lipids

Protein source had a significant effect on serum TC (P = 0·0086), HDL-C (P = 0·027) and non-HDL-C (P = 0·049), but not on TAG (P = 0·065) (Table 5). Hamsters fed WG had significantly lower serum TC and HDL-C than hamsters fed either BF or SOY. Hamsters fed CAS also had significantly lower HDL-C than those fed BF or SOY, but significantly lower TC than only BF. However, only hamsters fed WG had significantly lower non-HDL-C than those fed BF. A trend to lower TAG concentrations was observed in the animals fed WG and SOY compared to BF, but this was not significant (P = 0·065).

Fatty acid composition of liver phospholipids

Protein source had a significant effect on the relative level (% of total) of several fatty acids in liver PL, including 18 : 3n-3 (P = 0·0011), 20 : 5n-3 (P = 0·0045), 22 : 5n-3 (P = 0·0001), 22 :  6n-3 (P = 0·0007), total n-3 PUFA (P = 0·0013), 20 : 4n-6 (P = 0·0000), 18 : 3n-6 (P = 0·04), 20 : 3n-6 (P = 0·0013), total n-6 PUFA (P = 0·0005), 18 : 1n-9 (P = 0·0002), total MUFA (P = 0·0001), as well as 20 : 5n-3/18 : 3n-3 (P = 0·0089) and 22 : 6n-3/18 : 3n-3 ratios (P = 0·0001), but not on 18 : 2n-6 (P = 0·56), 16 : 0 (P = 0·27), 18 : 0 (P = 0·17) or total SFA (P = 0·08) (Table 6).

Table 6 Fatty acid (FA) profile of liver phospholipids of hamsters fed one of the four different sources of protein in their diets for 8 weeks

(Mean values with their standard errors for six hamsters per group)

CAS, casein; BF, beef protein; WG, wheat gluten; SOY, soya protein.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

For the n-3 PUFA series, hamsters fed WG or SOY had significantly lower percentages of 18 : 3n-3 and 22 : 5n-3, but significantly higher percentages of 22 : 6n-3, total n-3 PUFA, as well as ratio of 20 : 5n-3/18 : 3n-3 and 22 : 6n-3/18 : 3n-3 than hamsters fed BF. However, only hamsters fed WG or BF had significantly lower percentages of 20 : 5n-3 than those fed CAS. In addition, hamsters fed CAS had percentage of 22 : 5n-3 significantly lower than those fed BF, but higher than those fed WG or SOY, and a significantly lower ratio of 20 : 5n-3/18 : 3n-3 than hamsters fed SOY.

For the n-6 PUFA series, hamsters fed WG, SOY or CAS had significantly lower percentages of 20 : 4n-6 and total n-6 PUFA than those fed BF. However, hamsters fed WG or SOY had significantly lower 20 : 3n-6 than those fed either BF or CAS. On the other hand, hamsters fed WG had significantly higher percentages of 18 : 3n-6 than those fed BF or CAS.

For the MUFA, hamsters fed WG or SOY had significantly lower percentages of 18 : 1n-9 and total MUFA than those fed BF or CAS.

mRNA abundances of selected hepatic enzymes and receptors involved in lipid metabolism

Protein source had a significant effect on the mRNA abundances of CYP7A1 (P = 0·052), LDL-R (P < 0·0049) and Δ6-desaturase (P < 0·032), but not those of HMG-CoAr (P = 0·21), lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (P = 0·49), SR-B1 (P = 0·15) or Δ5-desaturase (P = 0·74) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Expression of genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism (a), hepatic cholesterol metabolism (b) and desaturation of n-6 and n-3 PUFA (c) in hamsters fed one of the four different sources of protein in their diets for 8 weeks (■, CAS, casein;, BF, beef protein;, SOY, soya protein;, WG, wheat gluten). Values are means with their standard errors depicted by vertical bars (seven hamsters per group). a,b,c Mean values within a cluster of bars with unlike superscript letters were significantly different by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0·05). CYP7A1, cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase; Δ5D, Δ5-desaturase; Δ6D, Δ6-desaturase; HMG-CoAr, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; LCAT, lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase; LDL-R, LDL receptor; SR-B1, scavenger receptor B1.

With respect to the selected enzymes and receptors involved in cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism, hamsters fed WG or SOY had significantly higher mRNA abundances (ratio to 18S) of LDL-R (Fig. 1 (a)) and CYP7A1 (Fig. 1 (b)) than hamsters fed BF, whereas hamsters fed CAS had significantly higher mRNA abundances of only LDL-R compared to those fed BF.

With respect to key enzymes involved in desaturation of the essential fatty acids linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid, hamsters fed WG or SOY had significantly higher mRNA abundances (ratio to 18S) of Δ6-desaturase than those fed BF (Fig. 1 (c)).

Discussion

The results of the present study support the hypothesis that the protein source is a determinant of the effects of the diet on lipid metabolism in the hamster. In addition, these effects appear to be attributed, at least in part, to changes in the mRNA levels of enzymes and receptors involved in cholesterol, lipoprotein and long-chain fatty acid metabolism.

The observations that neither food intake, nor body weight, nor body weight gain were different among the four protein sources (Table 5) are of particular importance. First, although WG is deficient in lysine (Table 3), there is no evidence that this was limiting at the level provided in the experimental diets, supporting previous findings that the importance of protein quality to meet the hamster's requirements is reduced by virtue of its forestomach microbial activity that ferments dietary protein(Reference Banta, Warner and Robertson25). Second, and most importantly, the observed differences in lipid metabolism indices can be attributed solely to the protein source.

Although the protein source in the diet had an impact on serum lipid concentrations in the present study, the differences were observed mainly between WG and BF protein, whereas the effects of SOY and CAS were intermediate. The present observations are inconsistent with previous studies showing hypocholesterolaemic actions of either WG or SOY compared to CAS. For example, Endo et al. (Reference Endo, Fu, Abe, Arai and Kato13) reported that a 12 % WG diet fed to adult male Wistar rats resulted in significantly lower TC and HDL-C, concomitant with higher expression of HMG-CoAr, HMG-CoA synthase and CYP7A1 than one with 12 % CAS. Although we also observed higher expression of CYP7A1 and a trend towards higher expression of HMG-CoAr, the discrepancy in the effects on circulating cholesterol could be due to the fact that the basal rate of hepatic cholesterol synthesis is high in the rat, whereas it is very low in the male hamster(Reference Spady and Dietschy16). Because the contribution of the liver to whole body cholesterol synthesis is higher in the rat than in the hamster, an up-regulation of the expression of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism would have a greater impact on circulating cholesterol levels in the former. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effect of WG on lipid metabolism in hamsters, and thus, direct comparisons cannot be made. It is important to note as well that the n-6+n-3 PUFA content of the WG diet was up to 4 % higher than that of the other diets. Although the effect of PUFA on cholesterol metabolism is well established, we do not believe that they contributed to the observed effect as WG and CAS, which have the highest and lowest levels of PUFA, resulted in similar cholesterol concentrations (Table 5).

Unlike WG, the cholesterolaemic effects of SOY and CAS have been compared in male hamsters, but the results are conflicting. Some studies have reported reduction of total, VLDL+LDL-C and HDL-C(Reference Blair, Appt, Netau-Pelissero, Clarkson, Anthony, Lamothe and Potter26Reference Potter, Pertile and Berber-Jimenez29), whereas others(Reference Wright and Salter30), like us, have not. Such differences might be explained by both the cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of the diet. In most of these studies, cholesterol at a minimum level of 0·01 % was added to the diet. Because dietary cholesterol substantially elevates TC and LDL-C in hamsters, an effect of protein can be more clearly observed when cholesterol is included in the diet. However, two groups also demonstrated a hypocholesterolaemic effect of SOY in hamsters fed cholesterol-free diet(Reference Terpstra, Holmes and Nicolosi27, Reference Balmir, Staack, Jeffrey, Jimenez, Wang and Potter31). In these studies, the major source of fat was the SFA-rich coconut oil, which was shown to increase plasma LDL-C in hamsters in a diet essentially free of cholesterol, albeit the effect was less pronounced than in the presence of cholesterol(Reference Spady and Dietschy18). Because the present diets were higher in unsaturated fatty acids than in SFA (ratio 1·7/1·0), it is possible that the hypocholesterolaemic effect of SOY (and WG) relative to CAS was obliterated in the absence of dietary cholesterol.

Of particular interest though was the observation that SOY resulted in higher HDL-C concentrations than either CAS or WG. Whereas it is not surprising that the hypocholesterolaemic effect of WG compared to SOY would affect HDL-C, the major carrier of plasma cholesterol in hamsters(Reference Trautwein, Liang and Hayes32), the higher HDL-C levels suggest a better lipoprotein profile in SOY-fed hamsters than CAS-fed ones. However, the present results cannot be explained by changes in SR-B1 or lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase mRNA levels, which were similar among all dietary groups, albeit there was a trend for higher transcript levels in the SOY groups (Fig. 1 (a)). The SR-B1, commonly referred to as HDL receptor, selectively transports cholesterol esters from HDL particles to the liver(Reference Lewis and Rader33). Although such function results in lower circulating HDL-C, over-expression of SR-B1 has been shown to protect against CHD, whereas its absence leads to the opposite(Reference Rader and Maugeais34). The anti-atherogenic effect of enhanced SR-B1 expression and/or activity despite decreased plasma HDL-C levels is indicative of enhanced reverse cholesterol transport, possibly due to negative hepatic cholesterol balance. Therefore, the higher concentrations of HDL-C in hamsters fed the SOY and BF diets could be due to alterations in the protein levels of these genes, in the expression and/or activity of other genes involved in HDL metabolism, such as Apo-AI or cholesteryl ester transfer protein, or simply to the fact that hamsters from both these diets had the highest levels of TC.

Perhaps the most important observation with respect to cholesterol metabolism was that BF protein resulted in the highest non-HDL-C (VLDL-cholesterol+LDL-C) that is accompanied by the highest and lowest expression of LDL-R and CYP7A1, respectively. HMG-CoAr was also lowest in BF-fed hamsters, albeit not significantly. However, the absence of statistical significance should be interpreted with caution because fasting down-regulates the expression of sterol regulatory element binding proteins, which are transcription factors that control the transcription of a plethora of genes involved in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, including HMG-CoAr and CYP7A1(Reference Horton, Bashmakov, Shimomura and Shimano35). Consequently, the down-regulation of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c by fasting would alleviate the inhibition of CYP7A1 gene expression. On the other hand, that of sterol regulatory element binding protein-2 would suppress the expression of HMG-CoAr, making it difficult to observe a significant effect of diet. Although it cannot be concluded that the changes in cholesterol metabolism are brought about by changes in the expression of the selected genes, the present results strongly suggest that protein source exerts its cholesterol-modulating effect at the level of the liver.

In addition to cholesterol, the present study provides further evidence that protein source affects long-chain PUFA metabolism. Specifically, WG, SOY and CAS resulted in higher relative concentrations of 22 : 6n-3 and long-chain n-3 PUFA and lower concentrations of 20 : 4n-6, long-chain n-6 PUFA, 18 : 1n-9 and total MUFA than BF in liver PL. However, only WG and SOY led to lower 18 : 3n-3 levels and a higher 22 : 6n-3/α-linolenic acid ratio than BF, supporting previous findings that protein source impacts long-chain n-6 and n-3 PUFA metabolism(Reference Noguchi, Takita, Suzuki, Nakamura and Innami36, Reference Ratnayake, Sarwar and Laffey37). Consistent with the present observations, WG- and SOY-fed hamsters had higher relative mRNA levels of Δ6-desaturase than those fed BF and CAS, although the difference was not significant with the latter. On the other hand, the relative abundance of Δ5-desaturase was similar in all groups despite lower levels of 20 : 5n-3 in WG-fed hamsters. This observation can be explained by enhanced elongation and desaturation of 20 : 5n-3, as shown by higher ratios of 22 : 6n-3/20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3/18 : 3n-3.

The metabolic conversion of α-linolenic acid to 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3 has been the centre of much debate. Based on stable isotope tracer studies, it is estimated that only 8 % of the 18 : 3n-3 pool enters the desaturation/elongation pathway in man, and that its overall efficiency of conversion to 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3 is 0·2 and 0·05 %, respectively(Reference Burdge and Calder38). It is generally agreed that the Δ6 desaturation of 18 : 3n-3 to 18 : 4n-3 is the rate-limiting reaction within the long-chain n-3 PUFA cascade(Reference Nakamura and Nara39). Because 18 : 2n-6 is also a substrate for Δ6-desaturase, the desaturation and elongation of 18 : 3n-3 to 20 : 5n-3 might be compromised at high intake ratios of 18 : 2n-6/18 : 3n-3. The ratio of 18 : 2n-6/18 : 3n-3 in our diets varied between 2·7 and 3·5, considered optimal for conversion of 18 : 3n-3 to 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3(Reference Blank, Neumann, Makrides and Gibson40). Although we did not directly measure conversion, the 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3 levels in liver PL of our hamsters mostly reflect desaturation and elongation of 18 : 3n-3 because the test and adaptation period diets were devoid of both these fatty acids, and the tissue levels of 20 : 4n-6 and long-chain n-6 PUFA were lower in hamsters fed WG, SOY and CAS diets. Therefore, it is possible that hamsters have higher expression and activity of Δ6-desaturase than man and that the fatty acid profile of the diet enhanced the effect of protein on 22 : 6n-3 levels in liver PL.

The finding that protein source impacts PUFA metabolism has important implications for cardiovascular health. Higher heart or erythocyte levels of n-3 PUFA have been associated with a lower risk for CVD(Reference Harris and Von41). This is partly due to the fact that they have anti-arrhythmic properties(Reference Kang and Leaf42) and are precursors of anti-inflammatory and anti-aggregatory eicosanoids(Reference Von43). Although we measured fatty acid profile only in liver PL, it has been reported that entry into this compartment was a limiting factor for the conversion of 18 : 3n-3 to 22 : 6n-3, and that the hepatic conversion is a predictor of plasma PL composition(Reference Goyens, Spilker, Zock, Katan and Mensink44, Reference Goyens, Spilker, Zock, Katan and Mensink45).

The exact mechanisms by which dietary protein affects lipid metabolism are not fully understood. The proteins provided in the diet are reported to have a high digestibility :  94 % (WG and BF), 96 % (SOY) and 99 % (CAS)(Reference Gilani, Lee, caballero, Trugo and Finglas46), and it is unlikely that the small differences in digestibility account significantly to the observed results. Individual and/or groups of amino acids have been proposed to modulate cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism(Reference Oda47). For example, dietary methionine content strongly and positively correlated with serum cholesterol levels(Reference Morita, Oh-hashi, Takei, Ikai, Kasaoka and Kiriyama48) and methionine supplementation abolished the hypocholesterolaemic effects of SOY in rats fed a cholesterol-free diet(Reference Sugiyama, Yamakawa, Kumazawa and Saeki49). In addition, methionine increased Δ6-desaturase activity in rats(Reference Shimada, Morita and Sugiyama14), and hepatic Δ6-desaturase activity appears to be regulated by Δ6-desaturase mRNA levels(Reference Cho, Nakamura and Clarke50). However, it is unlikely that the methionine content of our proteins explained the present results because CAS, which contains the highest amount of methionine (Table 3), had significantly lower concentrations of TC than BF, but similar ones to WG and SOY (Table 5), which contain the lowest amount (Table 3). Moreover, WG and/or SOY had the highest percentage of 22 : 6n-3 in liver PL and hepatic Δ6-desaturase mRNA levels. In addition to methionine, cystine, lysine, glycine and arginine have been proposed to modulate cholesterol and PUFA metabolism, but the evidence is inconclusive and none of them appear to explain the present results.

The influence of bioactive peptides derived from protein digestion on lipid metabolism offers an alternative hypothesis. It has been increasingly acknowledged that the nutritional role of protein extends beyond the provision of amino acids for the synthesis of proteins. Bioactive peptides released during protein digestion can act locally (in the gut) or, if absorbed, in target organs to modulate a variety of physiological functions(Reference Kitts and Weiler51). Bioactive peptides have been identified in many dietary proteins, including CAS, whey, BF, SOY and WG(Reference Cho, Nakamura and Clarke50). Whether bioactive peptides play a role in modulating cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism, as we observed in the present study, is currently unknown. Some studies have shown that the hypocholesterolaemic effect of SOY is partly explained by the binding of undigested peptide fraction to cholesterol and bile acids and their subsequent excretion in faeces(Reference Gatchalian-Yee, Imamura, Nonaka, Gu and Sugano52, Reference Gatchalian-Yee, Arimura, Ochiai, Yamada and Sugano53). However, SOY was not hypocholesterolaemic compared to other proteins and whether such a mechanism accounts for the hypocholesterolaemic effect of WG remains to be investigated.

In conclusion, we have provided evidence that the source of dietary protein modulates cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism in hamsters, an animal model suitable to study the impact of diet on lipid metabolism, in the absence of dietary cholesterol and at fat intakes representative of the average Canadian diet. The present findings call for further investigation on the mechanisms of action of dietary protein with respect to lipid metabolism and suggest that dietary strategies aiming at preventing and/or managing CVD might need to take the source of the protein into consideration.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Office of the Chief Scientist, Health Canada. A. A. and C. C.-H. are recipients of the Health Canada Office of Chief Scientist Postdoctoral Fellowship Award. The authors would like to thank Louise Plouffe, Carla Wood, Philip Griffin and Patrick Robertson for their technical advice and assistance. None of the authors had a conflict of interest.

References

1 Manuel, DG, Leung, M, Nguyen, K, Tanuseputro, P & Johansen, H (2003) Burden of cardiovascular disease in Canada. Can J Cardiol 19, 9971004.Google ScholarPubMed
2 Smith, ER (2003) The cost of illness. Can J Cardiol 19, 187189.Google ScholarPubMed
3 Lichtenstein, AH (2006) Thematic review series: patient-oriented research. Dietary fat, carbohydrate, and protein: effects on plasma lipoprotein patterns. J Lipid Res 47, 16611667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Anderson, JW, Konz, EC & Jenkins, DJ (2000) Health advantages and disadvantages of weight-reducing diets: a computer analysis and critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 19, 578590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Krieger, JW, Sitren, HS, Daniels, MJ & Langkamp-Henken, B (2006) Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression 1. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 260274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Hu, FB (2005) Protein, body weight, and cardiovascular health. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 242S247S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Anderson, GH & Moore, SE (2004) Dietary proteins in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans. J Nutr 134, 974S979S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Aziz, A, Anderson, GH, Giacca, A & Cho, F (2005) Hyperglycemia after protein ingestion concurrent with injection of a GLP-1 receptor agonist in rats: a possible role for dietary peptides. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289, R688R694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Kritchevsky, D (1995) Dietary protein, cholesterol and atherosclerosis: a review of the early history. J Nutr 125, 589S593S.Google ScholarPubMed
10 Anderson, JW, Johnstone, BM & Cook-Newell, ME (1995) Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N Engl J Med 333, 276282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Carroll, KK & Kurowska, EM (1995) Soy consumption and cholesterol reduction: review of animal and human studies. J Nutr 125, 594S597S.Google ScholarPubMed
12 Bassat, M & Mokady, S (1985) The effect of amino-acid-supplemented wheat gluten on cholesterol metabolism in the rat. Br J Nutr 53, 2530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Endo, Y, Fu, Z, Abe, K, Arai, S & Kato, H (2002) Dietary protein quantity and quality affect rat hepatic gene expression. J Nutr 132, 36323637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Shimada, Y, Morita, T & Sugiyama, K (2003) Increased response of liver microsomal delta 6-desaturase activity to dietary methionine in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67, 743751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Sugiyama, K, Ohkawa, S & Muramatsu, K (1986) Relationship between amino acid composition of diet and plasma cholesterol level in growing rats fed a high cholesterol diet. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 32, 413423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Spady, DK & Dietschy, JM (1983) Sterol synthesis in vivo in 18 tissues of the squirrel monkey, guinea pig, rabbit, hamster, and rat. J Lipid Res 24, 303315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Mendelson, R, Tarasuk, V, Chappell, J, Brown, H & Anderson, GH (2003) Report of the Ontario Food Survey. http:/www.ryerson.ca/~foodnut/facultyandstaff/Ontario_Food_Survey_Report_June_2003.pdf.Google Scholar
18 Spady, DK & Dietschy, JM (1988) Interaction of dietary cholesterol and triglycerides in the regulation of hepatic low density lipoprotein transport in the hamster. J Clin Invest 81, 300309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Jones, PJ (1997) Regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis by diet in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 438446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Shimomura, I, Bashmakov, Y, Shimano, H, Horton, JD, Goldstein, JL & Brown, MS (1997) Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 1235412359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Hayes, KC, Stephan, ZF, Pronczuk, A, Lindsey, S & Verdon, C (1989) Lactose protects against estrogen-induced pigment gallstones in hamsters fed nutritionally adequate purified diets. J Nutr 119, 17261736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Arlington, VAAOAC.Google Scholar
23 Sarwar, G, Botting, HG & Peace, RW (1988) Complete amino acid analysis in hydrolysates of foods and feces by liquid chromatography of precolumn phenylisothiocyanate derivatives. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 71, 11721175.Google ScholarPubMed
24 Bligh, EG & Dyer, WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37, 911917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Banta, CA, Warner, RG & Robertson, JB (1975) Protein nutrition of the golden hamster. J Nutr 105, 3845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Blair, RM, Appt, SE, Netau-Pelissero, C, Clarkson, TB, Anthony, MS, Lamothe, V & Potter, SM (2002) Dietary soy and soy isoflavones have gender-specific effects on plasma lipids and isoflavones in golden Syrian f(1)b hybrid hamsters. J Nutr 132, 35853591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Terpstra, AH, Holmes, JC & Nicolosi, RJ (1991) The hypocholesterolemic effect of dietary soybean protein vs. casein in hamsters fed cholesterol-free or cholesterol-enriched semipurified diets. J Nutr 121, 944947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Forsythe, WA III (1995) Soy protein, thyroid regulation and cholesterol metabolism. J Nutr 125, 619S623S.Google ScholarPubMed
29 Potter, SM, Pertile, J & Berber-Jimenez, MD (1996) Soy protein concentrate and isolated soy protein similarly lower blood serum cholesterol but differently affect thyroid hormones in hamsters. J Nutr 126, 20072011.Google ScholarPubMed
30 Wright, SM & Salter, AM (1998) Effects of soy protein on plasma cholesterol and bile acid excretion in hamsters. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 119, 247254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Balmir, F, Staack, R, Jeffrey, E, Jimenez, MD, Wang, L & Potter, SM (1996) An extract of soy flour influences serum cholesterol and thyroid hormones in rats and hamsters. J Nutr 126, 30463053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Trautwein, EA, Liang, J & Hayes, KC (1993) Plasma lipoproteins, biliary lipids and bile acid profile differ in various strains of Syrian hamsters Mesocricetus auratus. Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol 104, 829835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Lewis, GF & Rader, DJ (2005) New insights into the regulation of HDL metabolism and reverse cholesterol transport. Circ Res 96, 12211232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Rader, DJ & Maugeais, C (2000) Genes influencing HDL metabolism: new perspectives and implications for atherosclerosis prevention. Mol Med Today 6, 170175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Horton, JD, Bashmakov, Y, Shimomura, I & Shimano, H (1998) Regulation of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in livers of fasted and refed mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 59875992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Noguchi, A, Takita, T, Suzuki, K, Nakamura, K & Innami, S (1992) Effects of casein and soy-protein on alpha-linolenic acid metabolism in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 38, 579591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Ratnayake, WM, Sarwar, G & Laffey, P (1997) Influence of dietary protein and fat on serum lipids and metabolism of essential fatty acids in rats. Br J Nutr 78, 459467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Burdge, GC & Calder, PC (2005) Conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to longer-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human adults. Reprod Nutr Dev 45, 581597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Nakamura, MT & Nara, TY (2003) Essential fatty acid synthesis and its regulation in mammals. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 68, 145150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Blank, C, Neumann, MA, Makrides, M & Gibson, RA (2002) Optimizing DHA levels in piglets by lowering the linoleic acid to alpha-linolenic acid ratio. J Lipid Res 43, 15371543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Harris, WS & Von, SC (2004) The Omega-3 Index: a new risk factor for death from coronary heart disease? Prev Med 39, 212220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Kang, JX & Leaf, A (2000) Prevention of fatal cardiac arrhythmias by polyunsaturated fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 202S207S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Von, SC (2000) n-3 fatty acids and the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 224S227S.Google Scholar
44 Goyens, PL, Spilker, ME, Zock, PL, Katan, MB & Mensink, RP (2006) Conversion of alpha-linolenic acid in humans is influenced by the absolute amounts of alpha-linolenic acid and linoleic acid in the diet and not by their ratio. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 4453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 Goyens, PL, Spilker, ME, Zock, PL, Katan, MB & Mensink, RP (2005) Compartmental modeling to quantify alpha-linolenic acid conversion after longer term intake of multiple tracer boluses. J Lipid Res 46, 14741483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 Gilani, GS & Lee, N (2003) Sources of food-grade protein. In Encyclopaedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, pp. 48734879 [caballero, B, Trugo, L and Finglas, P, editors]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Oda, H (2006) Functions of sulfur-containing amino acids in lipid metabolism. J Nutr 136, 1666S1669S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Morita, T, Oh-hashi, A, Takei, K, Ikai, M, Kasaoka, S & Kiriyama, S (1997) Cholesterol-lowering effects of soybean, potato and rice proteins depend on their low methionine contents in rats fed a cholesterol-free purified diet. J Nutr 127, 470477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49 Sugiyama, K, Yamakawa, A, Kumazawa, A & Saeki, S (1997) Methionine content of dietary proteins affects the molecular species composition of plasma phosphatidylcholine in rats fed a cholesterol-free diet. J Nutr 127, 600607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50 Cho, HP, Nakamura, MT & Clarke, SD (1999) Cloning, expression, and nutritional regulation of the mammalian Delta-6 desaturase. J Biol Chem 274, 471477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51 Kitts, DD & Weiler, K (2003) Bioactive proteins and peptides from food sources. Applications of bioprocesses used in isolation and recovery. Curr Pharm Des 9, 13091323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52 Gatchalian-Yee, M, Imamura, M, Nonaka, M, Gu, JY & Sugano, M (1994) Effect of dietary fats on cholesterol metabolism and eicosanoid production in hamsters fed undigested fraction of soybean protein. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 40, 499504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53 Gatchalian-Yee, M, Arimura, Y, Ochiai, E, Yamada, K & Sugano, M (1997) Soybean protein lowers serum cholesterol levels in hamsters: effect of debittered undigested fraction. Nutrition 13, 633639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets (g/kg)

Figure 1

Table 2 Fatty acid (FA) composition of the experimental diets (% of total FA)*

Figure 2

Table 3 Amino acid composition of the experimental diets (g/100 g protein)*

Figure 3

Table 4 Oligonucleotide sequence for reverse transcription and RT–PCR

Figure 4

Table 5 Food intake, body weight and plasma lipid concentrations of hamsters fed one of the four different sources of protein in their diets for 8 weeks(Mean values with their standard errors for seven hamsters per group)

Figure 5

Table 6 Fatty acid (FA) profile of liver phospholipids of hamsters fed one of the four different sources of protein in their diets for 8 weeks(Mean values with their standard errors for six hamsters per group)

Figure 6

Fig. 1 Expression of genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism (a), hepatic cholesterol metabolism (b) and desaturation of n-6 and n-3 PUFA (c) in hamsters fed one of the four different sources of protein in their diets for 8 weeks (■, CAS, casein;, BF, beef protein;, SOY, soya protein;, WG, wheat gluten). Values are means with their standard errors depicted by vertical bars (seven hamsters per group). a,b,c Mean values within a cluster of bars with unlike superscript letters were significantly different by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0·05). CYP7A1, cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase; Δ5D, Δ5-desaturase; Δ6D, Δ6-desaturase; HMG-CoAr, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; LCAT, lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase; LDL-R, LDL receptor; SR-B1, scavenger receptor B1.