Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:21:56.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Øyvind Stiansen Open the ORCID record for Øyvind Stiansen [Opens in a new window]
Øyvind Stiansen*
Affiliation:
PluriCourts, University of Oslo
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: oyvind.stiansen@jus.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

European Court of Human Rightsjudicial politicscompliancehuman rightscourtsjudicializationimplementationlaw and politics
Type
Letter
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 899 - 907
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, TL and Huth, PK (2006) Legitimizing dispute settlement: international legal rulings as domestic political cover. American Political Science Review 100(2), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, L (1976) Implementation of judicial decisions an organizational analysis. American Politics Quarterly 4(1), 86–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, JM and Jones, BS (2004) Event History Modeling. A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çali, B and Koch, A (2014) Foxes guarding the foxes? The peer review of human rights judgments by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Human Rights Law Review 14(2), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, CJ and Gabel, M (2015) International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements: A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carrubba, CJ, Gabel, M and Hankla, C (2008) Judicial behavior under political constraints: evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review 102(04), 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallaro, JL and Brewer, ES (2008) Reevaluating regional human rights litigation in the twenty-first century: the case of the Inter-American Court. American Journal of International Law 102(4), 768–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M et al. (2018) V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v8. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Diamond, A and Sekhon, JS (2013) Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: a general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(3), 932–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, A and Speck, A-K (2019) The European Court of Human Rights’ remedial practice and its impact on the execution of judgments. Human Rights Law Review 19(1), 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauri, V, Staton, JK and Vargas Cullell, J (2015) The Costa Rican Supreme Court's compliance monitoring system. The Journal of Politics 77(3), 774–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, JL, Caldeira, GA and Baird, VA (1998) On the legitimacy of national high courts. American Political Science Review 92(2), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grambsch, P and Therneau, T (1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81(3), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, S and Voeten, E (2015) Are new democracies better human rights compliers? International Organization 69(02), 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, MEK (2011) The Nature of Supreme Court Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, MEK (2014) The semiconstrained court: public opinion, the separation of powers, and the US Supreme Court's fear of nonimplementation. American Journal of Political Science 58(2), 352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, C (2014a) Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, C (2014b) The power of human rights tribunals: compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change. European Journal of International Relations 20(4), 1100–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, DE, Imai, K, King, G and Stuart, EA (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis 15(3), 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, RJ (2006) The use of rhetorical sources by the US Supreme Court. Law & Society Review 40(4), 817–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, L (2015) Strengthening International Courts: The Hidden Costs of Legalization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, D and Taylor, MM (2013) Compliance: conceptualizing, measuring, and explaining adherence to judicial rulings. Law & Social Inquiry 38(4), 803–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, TM and Strother, L (2016) Judicial impact. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H and Marti, C (2015) Reconceptualizing implementation: the judicialization of the execution of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments. European Journal of International Law 26(4), 829–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, J (2019) Elections, public awareness, and the efficacy of constitutional review. Journal of Law and Courts 7(1), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, JN (2016) The politics of judicial procedures: the role of public oral hearings in the German Constitutional Court. American Journal of Political Science 60(4), 990–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropko, J and Harden, JJ (2017) Beyond the hazard ratio: generating expected durations from the Cox proportional hazards model. British Journal of Political Science. First View, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700045X.Google Scholar
Larsson, O et al. (2017) Speaking law to power: the strategic use of precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 50(50), 870–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Y and Voeten, E (2012) Precedent in international courts: a network analysis of case citations by the European Court of Human Rights. British Journal of Political Science 42(2), 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, GN (2008) The Hollow Hope. Can Courts Bring About Social Change? 2nd edn. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhon, JS (2011) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 10(2), 1–47.Google Scholar
Spriggs, JF (1996) The Supreme Court and federal administrative agencies: a resource-based theory and analysis of judicial impact. American Journal of Political Science 40(4), 1122–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, JK (2004) Judicial policy implementation in Mexico City and Merida. Comparative Politics 37(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, JK (2006) Constitutional review and the selective promotion of case results. American Journal of Political Science 50(1), 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, JK (2010) Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, JK and Romero, A (2019) Rational remedies: the role of opinion clarity in the Inter-American Human Rights System. International Studies Quarterly DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqz031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, JK and Vanberg, G (2008) The value of vagueness: delegation, defiance, and judicial opinions. American Journal of Political Science 52(3), 504–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiansen, Ø (2019) Replication Data for: Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9HKISQ, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:cbS7Zi2nAp9Y1vmvPnMWIA== [fileUNF]Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A and Keller, H (2008) The reception of the ECHR in national legal orders. In Helen, K and Stone Sweet, A (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Vanberg, G (2001) Legislative-judicial relations: a game-theoretic approach to constitutional review. American Journal of Political Science 45(2), 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, G (2005) The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voeten, E (2014) Domestic implementation of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: legal infrastructure and government effectiveness matter: a reply to Dia Anagnostou and Alina Mungiu-Pippidi. European Journal of International Law 25(1), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Stiansen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9HKISQ
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Stiansen supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Stiansen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 446 KB