Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:14:23.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A PCR-based diagnostic assay for detecting DNA of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae, in the gut of soil-living arthropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2016

M. Rejili ,
T. Fernandes ,
A.M. Dinis ,
J.A. Pereira ,
P. Baptista ,
S.A.P. Santos  and
T. Lino-Neto
M. Rejili
Affiliation:
BioSystems and Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Plant Functional Biology Centre, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
T. Fernandes
Affiliation:
BioSystems and Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Plant Functional Biology Centre, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
A.M. Dinis
Affiliation:
CIMO/School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
J.A. Pereira
Affiliation:
CIMO/School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
P. Baptista
Affiliation:
CIMO/School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
S.A.P. Santos
Affiliation:
CIMO/School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
T. Lino-Neto*
Affiliation:
BioSystems and Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Plant Functional Biology Centre, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +351 253 601544 Fax: +351 253 678980 E-mail: tlneto@bio.uminho.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is considered the most devastating pest of the olive tree worldwide. In an effort to develop management and biological control strategies against this pest, new molecular tools are urgently needed. In this study, we present the design of B. oleae-specific primers based on mitochondrial DNA sequences of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Two pairs of B. oleae-specific primers were successfully designed and named as SBo1-F/SBo1-R and SBo2-F/SBo1-R, being able to amplify 108 and 214 bp COI fragments, respectively. The specificity of designed primers was tested by amplifying DNA from phylogenetically related (i.e. Diptera order) and other non-pest insects living in olive groves from the Mediterranean region. When using these primers on a PCR-based diagnostic assay, B. oleae DNA was detected in the gut content of a soil-living insect, Pterostichus globosus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Carabidae). The detection of B. oleae DNA in the guts of arthropods was further optimized by adding bovine serum albumin enhancer to the PCR reaction, in order to get a fast, reproducible and sensitive tool for detecting B. oleae remains in the guts of soil-living arthropods. This molecular tool could be useful for understanding pest–predator relationships and establishing future biological control strategies for this pest.

Keywords

Bactrocera oleaespecific primersdiagnostic PCRfeeding assay
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 695 - 699
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admassu, B., Juen, A. & Traugott, M. (2006) Earthworm primers for DNA-based gut content analysis and their cross-reactivity in a multi-species system. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38, 1308–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agboton, B.V., Junior, I.D., Hanna, R. & Tiedemann, A.V. (2009) Molecular detection and differentiation of Brazilian and African isolates of the entomopathogen Neozygites tanajoae (Entomophthorales: Neozygitaceae) with PCR using specific primers. Biocontrol Science and Technology 19, 67–79.Google Scholar
Augustinos, A., Zacharopoulou, E., Stratikopoulos, A. & Mathiopoulos, K. (2002) Polymorphic microsatellite markers in the olive fly, Bactrocera oleae . Molecular Ecology Notes 2, 278–280.Google Scholar
Bueno, A.M. & Jones, O. (2002) Alternative methods for controlling the olive fly, Bactrocera oleae, involving semiochemicals. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 25, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cameron, S.L. (2014) Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annual Review Entomology 59, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copeland, R.S., White, I.M., Okumu, M., Machera, P. & Wharton, R.A. (2004) Insects associated with fruits of the Oleaceae (Asteridae, Lamiales) in Kenya, with special reference to the Tephritidae (Diptera). Bishop Museum Bulletin in Entomology 12, 135–164.Google Scholar
Daane, K.M., Middleton, M.C., Sforza, R., Cooper, M.L., Walton, V.M., Walsh, D.B., Zaviezo, T. & Almeida, R.P.P. (2011) Development of a multiplex PCR for identification of vineyard mealybugs. Environmental Entomology 40, 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinis, A.M., Pereira, J.A., Pimenta, M.C., Oliveira, J., Benhadi-Marín, J. & Santos, S.A. (2016 a) Suppression of Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae by soil arthropods in the olive grove. Journal of Applied Entomology. doi: 10.1111/jen.12291.Google Scholar
Dinis, A.M., Pereira, J.A., Benhadi-Marín, J. & Santos, S.A.P. (2016 b) Feeding preferences and functional responses of Calathus granatensis and Pterostichus globosus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on pupae of Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research. doi: 10.1017/S0007485316000213.Google Scholar
Farell, E.M. & Alexandre, G. (2012) Bovine serum albumin further enhances the effects of organic solvents on increased yield of polymerase chain reaction of GC-rich templates. BMC Research Notes 5, 257.Google Scholar
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294–299.Google Scholar
Gariepy, T.D., Kuhlmann, U., Gillott, C. & Erlandson, M. (2007) Parasitoids, predators and PCR: the use of diagnostic molecular markers in biological control of arthropods. Journal of Applied Entomology 131, 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.F., Kelso, S., Jackson, M.D., Kits, J.H., Miranda, G.F.G. & Skevington, J.H. (2011) Diptera-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification primers of use in molecular phylogenetic research. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 104, 976–997.Google Scholar
Hawkes, N.J., Janes, R.W., Hemingway, J. & Vontas, J. (2005) Detection of resistance-associated point mutations of organophosphate-insensitive acetylcholinesterase in the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 81, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. & DeWaard, J.R. (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270, 313–321.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C., Chapman, T.A., Micallef, J.L. & Reynolds, O.L. (2012) Molecular techniques for the detection and differentiation of host and parasitoid species and the implications for fruit fly management. Insects 3, 763–788.Google Scholar
Jiang, F., Li, Z.H., Deng, Y.L., Wu, J.J., Liu, R.S. & Buahom, N. (2013) Rapid diagnosis of the economically important fruit fly, Bactrocera correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on a species-specific barcoding cytochrome oxidase I marker. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103, 363–371.Google Scholar
Jiang, F., Li, Z.H., Wu, J.J., Wang, F.X. & Xiong, H.L. (2014) A rapid diagnostic tool for two species of Tetradacus (Diptera: Tephritidae: Bactrocera) based on species-specific PCR. Journal of Applied Entomology 138, 418–422.Google Scholar
Lunt, D.H., Zhang, D.X., Szymura, J.M. & Hewitt, G.M. (1996) The insect cytochrome oxidase I gene: evolutionary patterns and conserved primers for phylogenetic studies. Insect Molecular Biology 5, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monzó, C., Sabater-Muñoz, B., Urbaneja, A. & Castañera, P. (2010) Tracking medfly predation by the wolf spider, Pardosa cribata Simon, in citrus orchards using PCR-based gut-content analysis. Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 145–152.Google Scholar
Staudacher, K., Wallinger, C., Schallhart, N. & Traugott, M. (2011) Detecting ingested plant DNA in soil-living insect larvae. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43, 346–350.Google Scholar
Vontas, J.G., Hejazi, M.J., Hawkes, N.J., Cosmidis, N., Loukas, M. & Hemingway, J. (2002) Resistance-associated point mutations of organophosphate insensitive acetylcholinesterase, in the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae . Insect Molecular Biology 11, 329–336.Google Scholar
Valentini, A., Miquel, C., Nawaz, M.A., Bellemain, E.V.A., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Gielly, L., Cruaud, C., Nascetti, G., Wincker, P., Swenson, J.E. & Taberlet, P. (2009) New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 51–60.Google Scholar