Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:40:39.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) of the Yemen Arab Republic. II. The Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille) group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. G. Pegram
Affiliation:
c/o Food and Agriculture Organization, P. O. Box 30563, Lusaka, Zambia
Danica Zivkovic
Affiliation:
c/o Food and Agriculture Organization, P. O. Box 30563, Lusaka, Zambia
F. Jongejan
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical Veterinary Medicine and Protoxoology, Department of Infections Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P. O. Box 80172, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Triks of the group of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille) in 423 total monthly collections taken from camels, cattle, donkeys, sheep and goats between September 1978 and August 1979, and in a few miscellaneous collections, from the Yemen Arab Republic were examined. Adult ticks of three species in the group were identified: R. camicasi Morel, Mouchet & Rodhain, R. turanicus Pomerantsev and R. sanguineus s.s. Host relationships and ecological affinities were analysed. R. sanguineus s.s. occurred rarely, only on dogs. R. turanicus occurred on all host species including dogs but more frequently on cattle and camels. It was collected from both dry and wet habitats but was taken regularly at only one wetter site. R. camicasi, the most common species in the group, occurred at most collecting sites on all host species except dogs. Overall, the numbers of R. sanguineus group ticks were low throughout the country and no seasonal patterns could be detected.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achuthan, H. N., Mahadevan, S. & Lalitha, C. M. (1980). Studies on the developmental forms of Babesia bigemina and Babesia canis in ixodid ticks.—Ind. Vet. J. 57, 181184.Google Scholar
Hoogstraal, H. (1979). The epidemiology of tick-borne Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Asia, Europe, and Africa.—J. med. Entomol. 15, 307417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoogstraal, H. & Kaiser, M. N. (1959). Tricks (Ixodoidea) of Arabia with special reference to the Yemen.—Fieldiana, Zool. 39, 297322.Google Scholar
Jongejan, J., Zivkovic, D., Pegram, R. G., Fison, T., Latif, A. A. & Paine, G. (1987). Ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) of the Blue and White Nile ecosystems in the Sudan with particular reference to the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group.—Expl App. Acarology 3, 331346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartan, B. M., Hunter, A. G., Pegram, R. G. & Bourne, A. S. (1987). Tick infestations on livestock in the Yemen Arab Republic and their potential as vectors of livestock diseases.—Trop. Anim. Health & Prod. 19, 2131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norval, R. A. I., Dailiecourt, T. & Pegram, R. G. (1983). The ticks of Zimbabwe. VI. The Rhipicephalus sanguineus group.—Zimbabwe vet. J. 13, 3846.Google Scholar
Pegram, R. G., Clifford, C. M., Walker, J. B. & Keirans, J. E. (1987a). Clarification of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group (Acari, Ixodoidea, Ixodidae). R. sulcatus Neumann, 1908 and R. turanicus Pomerantsev, 1936.—Syst. Parasit. 10, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegram, R. G., Hoogstraal, H. & Wassef, H. Y. (1982). Ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) of the Yemen Arab Republic. I. Species infesting livestock.—Bull. ent. Res. 72, 215227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegram, R. G., Keirans, J. E., Cliford, C. M. & Walker, J. B. (1987b). Clarification of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group (Acari, Ixodoidea, Ixodidae). II. R. sanguineus Latreille, 1809 and related species.—Syst. Parasit. 10, 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantsev, B. I. (1950). Arachnoide. Vol. IV, pt. 2. Ixodid ticks (Ixodidae) [in Russian].—Fauna SSSR no. 41, 223 pp. (Engl. transl. by Elbl, A. (Anastos, G. (Ed.)).—199 pp. Washington, D.C., Am. Inst. Biol. Sci.)Google Scholar