Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:49:23.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative developmental biology of populations of three European and one North American Eubazus spp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), parasitoids of Pissodes spp. weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Kenis ,
M.A. Hulme  and
N.J. Mills
M. Kenis*
Affiliation:
International Institute of Biological Control, European Station, Delémont, Switzerland
M.A. Hulme
Affiliation:
Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, Canada
N.J. Mills
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley, USA
*
M. Kenis, IIBC European Station, 1 Chemin des Grillons, 2800 Delémont, Switzerland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observations were made on the developmental responses of the North American braconid species, Eubazus crassigaster, a parasitoid of the white pine weevil, Pissoles strobi, and three European congeneric species, E. semirugosus, E. robustus, and Eubazus sp. Several populations of Eubazus spp. were compared in their phenology in the laboratory and under natural conditions. When reared in the laboratory on non-diapausing Pissodes castaneus, mountain populations of E. semirugosus and E. robustus entered into an obligatory diapause in the host larva, whereas all the other populations tested developed continuously. Diapausing larvae continued their development only after having experienced at least three months at 2°C. Non-diapausing populations of Eubazus spp. significantly differed in the duration of pre-imaginal development, with E. semirugosus being the fastest developing species and E. robustus the slowest. Outdoor rearings of Eubazus spp. on P. castaneus showed that E. crassigaster, Eubazus sp. and the lowland biotype of E. semirugosus emerged in the year of oviposition if this occurred early enough to allow parasitoid development. In contrast, a majority of E. robustus individuals overwintered in the host larvae, regardless of the oviposition date. The diapausing, mountain biotype of E. semirugosus is considered as the most promising candidate for control of P. strobi in Canada, because it is likely to be better adapted to the life cycle of the target host than the other Eubazus spp., including the native E. crassigaster.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 143 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alauzet, C. (1977) Cycle biologique de Pissodes notatus (Coleoptera Curculionidae) dans la région Toulousaine (France). Canadian Entomologist 109, 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alauzet, C. (1987) Bioecologie de Eubazus semirugosus, Coeloides abdominalis et C. sordidator (Hym.: Braconidae) parasites de Pissodes notatus (Col.: Curculionidae) dans le sud de la France. Entomophaga 32, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfaro, R.I. (1982) Fifty year-old Sitka spruce plantations with a history of intense weevil attack. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 79, 62–65.Google Scholar
Alfaro, R.I., Hulme, M.A. & Harris, J.W.E. (1985) Insects associated with the Sitka spruce weevil, Pissodes strobi (Col.: Curculionidae) on Sitka spruce, Picea sitchensis in British Columbia, Canada. Entomophaga 30, 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annila, E. (1975) The biology of Pissodes validirostris Gyll. (Col., Curculionidae) and its harmfulness, especially in Scots pine seed orchards. Communicationes Instituti forestalls Fenniae 85, 1–95.Google Scholar
Beckage, N.E. (1993) Games parasites play: the dynamic roles of proteins and peptides in the relationship between parasite and host. pp. 25–57in Beckage, N.E., Thompson, S.N. & Frederici, B.A. (Eds) Parasites and pathogens of insects. Vol. 1. San Diego, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carl, K.P. (1976) The natural enemies of the pear-slug, Caliroa cerasi (L.) (Hym., Tenthredinidae), in Europe. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 80, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cock, M.J.W. (1986) Requirements for biological control. Biocontrol News and Information 7, 7–16.Google Scholar
Deyrup, M.A. (1975) The insect community of dead and dying Douglas-fir. I. The Hymenoptera. Coniferous Forest Biome Bulletin 6, 1–104.Google Scholar
Deyrup, M.A. (1978) Notes on the biology of Pissodes fasciatus LeConte and its insect associates. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 54, 103–106.Google Scholar
Drooz, A.T. (1985) Insects of eastern forests. USDA Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publications 1426, 1–608.Google Scholar
Furniss, R.L. & Carolin, U.M. (1977) Western forest insects. USDA Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publications 1339, 1–654.Google Scholar
Haardt, H. & Höller, C. (1992) Differences in life history traits between isofemale lines of the aphid parasitoid Aphelinus abdominalis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 479–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeselbarth, E. (1962). Zur Biologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte und Oekologie von Brachistes atricornis Ratz. als eines Parasiter von Pissodes piceae. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 49, 233–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, M. & Doutt, R.L. (1954) Biological evidences of sibling species in Aphytis maculicornis (Masi). (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Canadian Entomologist 86, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P.M. (1994) Ministry of Forests perspectives on spruce reforestation in British Columbia, pp. 1–6in Alfaro, R.I., Kiss, G. & Fraser, R.G. (Eds) The white pine weevil: biology, damage, and management. Forest Resource Development Agreement Report 226.Google Scholar
Hopper, K.R., Roush, R.T. & Powell, W. (1993) Management of genetics of biological control introductions. Annual Review of Entomology 38, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M.A. (1985) Improving establishment of arthropod natural enemies, pp. 151–166in Hoy, M.A. & Herzog, D.C. (Eds) Biological control in agricultural IPM systems. New York, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, M.A. (1994) The potential of Allodorus crassigaster for the biological control of Pissodes strobi. pp. 294–300in Alfaro, R.I., Kiss, G. & Fraser, R.G. (Eds) The white pine weevil: biology, damage, and management. Forest Resource Development Agreement Report 226.Google Scholar
Hulme, M.A., Dawson, A.F. & Harris, J.W.E. (1986) Exploiting cold-hardiness to separate Pissodes strobi (Peck) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from associated insects in leaders of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. Canadian Entomologist 118, 1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. (1985) Endocrine interaction between host (Lepidoptera) and parasite (Cheloninae: Hymenoptera): is the host or the parasite in control? Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenis, M. (1994) Variations in diapause among populations of Eubazus semirugosus (Nees) (Hym.: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Pissodes spp. (Col.: Curculionidae). Norwegian journal of Agricultural Sciences, Supplement 16, 77–82.Google Scholar
Kenis, M. & Mills, N.J. (1994) Parasitoids of European species of the genus Pissodes (Col: Curculionidae) and their potential for the biological control of Pissodes strobi (Peck) in Canada. Biological Control 4, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudela, M. (1974) Curculionidae, Pissodini. pp. 299–310in Schwenke, W. (Ed) Die Forstschädlinge Europas. 2 Band. Hamburg, Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Lavallée, R. & Benoit, P. (1989) Le charancon du pin blanc. Forêts Canada, Feuillet d'Information, CFL 18, 1–13.Google Scholar
Lavallée, R. & Morissette, J. (1989) Le Contrôle mécanique du charancon du pin blanc. Forêts Canada, Feuillet d'Information. CFL 25, 1–9.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P.O. (1986) Host-parasite hormonal interactions: an overview. Journal of Insect Physiology 32, 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P.O. & Lanzrein, B. (1993) Hormonal interactions between insect endoparasitoids and their host insects, pp. 59–86in Beckage, N.E., Thompson, S.N. & Frederici, B.A. (Eds) Parasites and pathogens of insects. Vol. I. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lovaszy, P. (1941) Zur Kenntnis der Schlupwespen einiger schädlichen Rüsselkäfer. Annales Entomologica Fennici 7, 194–204.Google Scholar
McMullen, L.H., Thomson, A.J. & Quenet, R.V. (1987) Sitka spruce weevil (Pissodes strobi) population dynamics and control: a simulation model based on field relationships. Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Information Report BC-X-288, 1–20.Google Scholar
Marsh, P.M. (1979) Braconidae, pp. 144–295in Krombein, K.V. et al. (Eds) Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico 1. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mills, N.J. (1983) The natural enemies of scolytids infesting conifer bark in Europe in relation to the biological control of Dendroctonus spp. in Canada. Biocontrol News and Information 4, 305–328.Google Scholar
Mills, N.J. (1994) Parasitoid guilds: defining the structure of the parasitoid communities of endopterygote insect hosts. Environmental Entomology 23, 1066–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, N.J. & Fischer, P. (1986) The entomophage complex of Pissodes weevils, with emphasis on the value of P. validirostris as a source of parasitoids for use in biological control, pp. 297–305in Roques, A. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the IUFRO Cone and Seed Insects Working Party, Briançon, Sept. 1986.Olivet (France),INRA.Google Scholar
Roques, A. (1975) Etude de la mérocénose des Cônes de pins sybestres en forêt de Fontainebleau. 164 pp. Thèse 3e cycle, Paris VI.Google Scholar
Ruberson, J.R., Tauber, M.J. & Tauber, C.A. (1989) Intraspecific variability in hymenopteran parasitoids: comparative studies of two biotypes of the egg parasitoid Edovum puttleri (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 62, 189–202.Google Scholar
Silver, G.T. (1968) Studies on the Sitka spruce weevil, Pissodes sitchensis in British Columbia. Canadian Entomologist 100, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.G. & Sudgen, B.A. (1969) Host trees and breeding sites of native North American Pissodes bark weevils, with a note on synonymy. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62, 146–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R.W. & Wood, D.L. (1964) The biology of Pissodes terminalis Hopping (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in California. Canadian Entomologist 96, 1208–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiling, P. (1993) Why do natural enemies fail in classical biological control programs? American Entomologist 39, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, M.R., Dover, B.A. & Johnson, J.A. (1990) Alterations in the ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone esterase profiles of Trichoplusia ni parasitized by the polyembryonic wasp Copidosoma floridanum. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 13, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, H.U. (1973) Remarks about Mansingh's and Müller's classifications of dormancies in insects. Canadian Entomologist 105, 925–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W.H. (1933) Notes on the natural control of Coleophora laricella, the larch case bearer. Biology and morphology of Angitia nana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 24, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turlings, T.C.J., Wäckers, F.L., Vet, L.E.M., Lewis, W.J. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1993) Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids. pp. 51–78in Lewis, A.C. & Papaj, D.R. (Eds) Insects learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. New York, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderSar, T.J.D. (1978) Emergence of predator and parasites of the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Engelmann spruce. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 75, 14–18.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. & Iwantsch, G.F. (1980) Host regulation by insect parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology 55, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waage, J.K., Carl, K.P., Mills, N.J. & Greathead, D.J. (1985) Rearing entomophagous insects, pp. 45–66in Singh, P. & Moore, R.F. (Eds) Handbook of insect rearing Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar