Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:29:29.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field application and effects of chlorpyrifos residues on Sitona discoideus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adults and implications for biological control by Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M.R. McNeill ,
L.M. Hunt  and
R.B. Chapman
M.R. McNeill*
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre, Canterbury, New Zealand
L.M. Hunt
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre, Canterbury, New Zealand
R.B. Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Animal Ecology, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
*
M.R. McNeill, AgResearch, Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre, PO Box 60, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorpyrifos was applied to field lucerne at a rate (0.3 kg/ha) recommended to control the weevil Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal. The fate of the weevil population and that of the immature stages of its parasitoid Microctonus aethiopoides Loan were examined by field sampling. A single application of chlorpyrifos reduced the weevil population by 96.2% 14 days after application. There was no significant decline in the control population between sampling intervals nor a change in the parasitism levels. However, in the insecticide-treated plots c. 88% of survivors (n=8) were parasitized. The effects of chlorpyrifos residues at 0.3 and 1.0 kg/ha were also examined. At the lower rate, residues produced c. 40–60% weevil mortality for up to 15 days after application although a significant decline in activity only occurred between days 1 and 3. At 1.0 kg/ha, the activity decay curve was much slower with no significant decline in weevil mortality for the first 15 days of the experiment. Weevil gender was shown to be a significant factor influencing mortality. Mortality of unparasitized weevils was also significantly greater than for parasitized hosts while the stage of parasitoid development had a significant effect on mortality. Where parasitoid development was sufficiently advanced, late-instar larva emerged and successfully pupated from cadavers up to 18 h following host mortality. The consequences of applying insecticide to control S. discoideus as they relate to the parasitoid and the success of biological control are discussed.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 86 , Issue 5 , October 1996 , pp. 559 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W.S. (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu, J.F. & Ellis, C.R. (1977) Toxicity of five insecticides to the alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica and its parasites, Bathyplectes curculionis and Microctonus aethiopoides. Environmental Entomology 6, 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, N.D. & Goldson, S.L. (1993) A modelling analysis of the successful biological control of Sitona discoideus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 30, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, B.A. & Brown, A.W.A. (1975) Responses of arthropod natural enemies to insecticides. Annual Review of Entomology 20, 285–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumbre, R.B. & Hower, A.A. Jr (1976) Relative toxicities of insecticides to the alfalfa weevil parasite Microctonus aethiops and the influence of parasitism on host susceptibility. Environmental Entomology 5, 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbre, R.B. & Hower, A.A. (1977) Contact mortality of the alfalfa weevil parasite Microctonus aethiopoides from insecticide residues in alfalfa. Environmental Entomology 6, 893–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duodu, Y.A. & Davis, D.W. (1974) A comparison of growth, food consumption, and food utilization between unparasitized alfalfa weevil larvae and those parasitized by Bathyplectus curculionis. (Thomson). Environmental Entomology 3, 705–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzen, G.W., O'Brien, P.J. & Powell, J.E. (1989) Toxic and behavioural effects of selected insecticides on the Heliothis parasitoid Microplitis croceipes. Entomophaga 34, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frampton, E.R. (1984) The seasonal pattern of Sitona discoideus larval establishment in Canterbury lucerne and its implications for control. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 12, 319–322.Google Scholar
Fusco, R.A. & Hower, A.A. Jr (1974) Influence of parasitoid-host density and host availability on the laboratory propagation of Microctonus aethiops (Hym.: Braconidae) parasitoid of Hypera postica (Coleop.: Curculionidae). Entomophaga 19, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, S.L. (1984) Sitona weevil in lucerne-biology and control. Aglinks FPP 548. Information Services, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Goldson, S.L. & French, R.A. (1983) Age-related susceptibility of lucerne to sitona weevil Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), larvae and the associated patterns of adult infestation. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, S.L., Frampton, E.R., Barratt, B.I.P. & Ferguson, C.M. (1984) The seasonal biology of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), an introduced pest of New Zealand lucerne. Bulletin of Entomological Research 74, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, S.L., Dyson, C.B., Proffitt, J.R., Frampton, E.R. & Logan, J.A. (1985) The effect of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on lucerne yields in New Zealand. Bulletin of Entomological Research 75, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, S.L., Frampton, E.R. & Proffitt, J.R. (1988) Population dynamics and larval establishment of Sitona discoideus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in New Zealand lucerne. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, S.L., Proffitt, J.R. & McNeill, M.R. (1990) Seasonal biology and cology in New Zealand of Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), a parasitoid of Sitona spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with special emphasis on atypical behaviour. Journal of Applied Ecology 27, 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, S.A. (1990) Testing methodology and the concept of the IOBC/WPRS working group pp. 1–18 in Jepson, P.C. (Ed.) Pesticide and non-target invertebrates. Wimbourne, Intercept.Google Scholar
Hassan, S.A. & Oomen, P.A. (1985) Testing the side effects of pesticides on beneficial organisms by OILB working party, pp. 145–152in Hussey, N.W. & Scopes, N. (Eds) Biological pest control. The glasshouse experience. Poole, Blandford Press.Google Scholar
Hower, A.A. Jr & Luke, J.E. (1975) Response of the alfalfa weevil parasitoid, Microctonus colesi (Drea) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), to a recommended insecticide treatment in Pennsylvania. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 83, 263–264.Google Scholar
Jepson, P.C. (1989) The temporal and spatial dynamics of pesticide side-effects on non-target invertebrates, pp. 95–127in Jepson, P.C. (Ed.) Pesticides and non-target invertebrates. Wimbourne, Intercept Ltd.Google Scholar
Jepson, P.C. & Thacker, J.R.M. (1990) Analysis of the spatial component of pesticide side-effects on non-target invertebrate populations and its relevance to hazard analysis. Functional Ecology 4, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, W.M. & Trought, T.E.T. (1982) Insect pests of lucerne in New Zealand, pp. 49–59in Wynn-Williams, R.B. (Ed.) Lucerne for the 80's. Agronomy Society of New Zealand special publication 1.Google Scholar
Loan, C.C. & Holdaway, F.G. (1961) Microctonus aethiops (Nees) Auctt. and Perilitus rutilus (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), European parasites of Sitona weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Canadian Entomologist 93, 1057–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, M.R. & Chapman, R.B. (1989) The toxicities of chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion to Microctonus aethiopoides and Sitona discoideus. Proceedings of the 42nd New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference,76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, R.L. (1958) Methods of topical application and injection, pp. 92–113in Shepard, H.H. (Ed.) Methods of testing chemicals on insects Vol. 1. Minneapolis, Burgess.Google Scholar
Sluss, R. (1968) Behavioural and anatomical responses of the convergent lady beetle to parasitism by Perilitus coccinellae (Shrank) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 10, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stufkens, M.W., Farrell, J.A. & Goldson, S.L. (1987) Establishment of Microctonus aethiopoides a parasitoid of the sitona weevil in New Zealand. Proceedings of the 40th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference,31–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veierov, D., Fenigstein, A., Melamed-Madjar, V. & Klein, M. (1988) Effects of concentration and application method on decay and residual activity of foliar chlorpyrifos. Journal of Economic Entomology 81, 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. & Iwantsch, G.F. (1980) Host regulation by insect parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology 55, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, G.H. & McDowell, L.L. (1987) Pesticide persistence on foliage. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 100, 23–73.Google Scholar