Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 July 2009
The following is a summary of the conclusions arrived at in the foregoing paper:—
(1) the species sinensis, barbirostris, umbrosus, albotaeniatus and asiatica have been considered valid;
(2) the species vanus, annularis, minutus, paeditaeniatus and separatus have been rejected as invalid;
(3) certain new characters of the valid species have been noticed;
(4) the descriptions of the species have been revised;
(5) the genus Patagiamyia has been rejected, as also the genus Lophoscelomyia, both having been included in the genus Myzorhynchus;
(6) it is suggested that the Myzorhynchus group forms a series sufficiently distinct from other Anophelines to make it advisable to give it a separate generic title.