Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:08:01.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two methods of estimating competitiveness of chemosterilized males of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Saiful Islam  and
Gordon R. Port
M. Saiful Islam*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Environmental Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Gordon R. Port
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Environmental Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
M. Saiful Islam, Department of Pure & Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading RG6 2AJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mating competitiveness and sexual or total competitiveness of males of the house fly, Musca domestica Linnaeus, treated with 1.0% hexamethyl phosphoramide (hempa) were measured quantitatively from direct observations and ratio test methods, respectively. From direct observations, treated males of Cooper and Boxted strains of M. domestica were found to obtain more first matings than untreated males (P <0.01 and P <0.05, respectively) when competing for untreated females, whilst by using the ratio test method under laboratory conditions, total competitiveness values (C) of treated males of the two strains were estimated to be 0.72–0.89 and 0.75–0.97, respectively, at three different ratios from 1:1:1 to 3:1:1.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 521 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borkovec, A.B. (1966) Insect chemosterilants. 143 pp. Metcalf, R.L. (Ed.) Advances in Pest Control Research. Vol. VII, New York Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Brower, J.H. (1982) Mating competitiveness of irradiated substerilized males of the tobacco moth. Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 454–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, M.M. (1965) Chemosterilants: first efficient compounds against screw-worm flies. Journal of Medical Entomology 2, 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eischen, F.A., Dietz, A. & Brower, J.H. (1984) Effect of aging on the mating competitiveness of irradiated male greater wax moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 1534–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Gazzar, L.M. & Dame, D.A. (1983) Effects of combinations of irradiation and chemosterilization on mating competitiveness of Culex quinquefasciatus Say. Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 1331–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, M. (1971) Determination of sterile-insect competitiveness. Journal of Economic Entomology 64, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fye, R.L. & LaBrecque, G.C. (1966) Sexual acceptability of laboratory strains of male house flies in competition with wild strains. Journal of Economic Entomology 59, 538–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, K.K. & Pillai, M.K.K. (1970) Mating ability and permanency of sterility in hempa-sterilized males of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti L. Journal of Medical Entomology 7, 198–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafez, M., Aboul-Nasr, E.A. & Salama, H.S. (1970) Studies on the control of mosquitoes in Egypt by means of Chemosterilants: II. Chemosterilization of Culex pipiens by tepa and hempa. Journal of Economic Entomology 63, 248–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, G.H.S. (1975) Sterilization of Dacus cucumis French (Diptera: Tephritidae) by gamma radiation. I. Effect of dose on fertility, survival and competitiveness. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 14, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, G.H.S. & Horton, I.F. (1981) Competitiveness of sterilized male insects: a method of calculating the variance of the value derived from competitive mating tests. Journal of Economic Entomology 74, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, G.H.S. & Katiyar, K.P. (1971) Competitiveness of gamma-sterilized males of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Journal of Economic Entomology 64, 1068–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaBrecque, G.C., Meifert, D.W. & Smith, C.N. (1962) Mating competitiveness of chemosterilized and normal house flies. Science 136, 388–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaBrecque, G.C., Morgan, P.B., Meifert, D.W. & Fye, R.L. (1966) Effectiveness of hempa as a house fly chemosterilant. Journal of Medical Entomology 3, 40–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, E.S. (1965) Chemical sterilization of the green sheep blowfly, Lucilia sericata Meigen, with ‘apholate’. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar