Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:38:18.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigrant Minority “Diplomacy”: American Jews and Russia, 1901–1912

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

Alan J. Ward
Get access

Extract

The influence of immigrant groups upon American foreign relations has been recognized in most standard American diplomatic histories, but reference is usually made in passing, and is rarely adequately documented. The administrations of Theodore Roosevelt and Taft are cases in point, and the influence of Jewish-Americans on certain of their decisions is the subject of this paper. No attempt has been made to exhaust the subjects of Jewish-American activities, Russo-American relations, or the Jews in Russia during the period analysed, but an effort has been made to illustrate, briefly, the general principle that immigrant minorities can exert an immense amount of pressure on American governments. Attention is focussed not upon the organization of a Jewish lobby, most notably the American Jewish Committee, but upon foreign policy decisions made in the light of what each President and Congress felt were demands and pressures from the potent Jewish minority.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the British Association for American Studies , Volume 9 , December 1964 , pp. 7 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for American Studies 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Roosevelt to F. P. Dunne (“Mr. Dooley”), Nov. 23, 1904. Morison, E.E. ed., The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt, Cambridge, Mass., 1951, v.4, p.1040.Google Scholar
2. Roosevelt to Hay, May 21 (tel.) May 25, 1903. Library of Congress, Papers of Theodore Roosevelt, Box 145, Personal Letter Books.Google Scholar
3.Bailey, T.A., A Diplomatic History of the American People, New York 1955, p. 560.Google Scholar
4. Dubnow, S. M., History of the Jews in Russia and Poland, trans. I. Friedlaender Philadelphia, 1918, v.2, pp.292 ff., 394 ff., 408 ff. See also C. Adler and A.M. Margolith, With Firmness in the Right: American Diplomatic Action Affecting Jews, 1840–1945, New York, 1946, Chs. 7 and 8.Google Scholar
5. For example, former President Grover Cleveland addressed a mass meeting in Carnegie Hall. New York Tribune, May 28, 1903.Google Scholar
6. Sir Herbert, Michael to Foreign Secretary, June 19, 1903. Great Britain, Public Record Office, Foreign Office 5/2523. See also: Consul-General Sanderson, New York, to Foreign Secretary, Feb. 28, 1905, and Acting Consul-General Bayley to Foreign Secretary, Sept. 26, 1905. F. O.5/2587.Google Scholar
7. Hay to Roosevelt, April 28, 1903. Library of Congress, Papers of John Hay, Box 26, Letterbook II.Google Scholar
8. Roosevelt to Root, July 2, 1908. Morison, op.cit., v.6, p. 1104.Google Scholar
9. Roosevelt to Root, March 19, 1904 Ibid., v.4, p. 759.Google Scholar
10.New York Tribune, June 16, 1903.Google Scholar
11. Raikes to Foreign Secretary, July 2, 1903. F. O. 5/2523. The petition is quoted in Adler and Margalith, op.cit., pp. 268–269.Google Scholar
12. Hay to Root, June 6, 1904. Library of Congress, Papers of Elihu Root, Box 226. Statements by Roosevelt and Hay are quoted in Adler and Margaiith, op.cit., p. 264.Google Scholar
13. Morison, op. cit., v.5, p. 113n.Google Scholar
14. Roosevelt to Sir George Trevelyan, May 13, 1905. Morison, op. cit., v.4, p. 1173.Google Scholar
15.Porter, K.H. and Johnson, D. B., eds. National Party Platform, 1840–1956, Urbana, Illinois, 1956, p. 140.Google Scholar
16. U.S. Congress, House Documents, Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 59 Congress, 1 session, Washington, 1906, p. 831.Google Scholar
17. Roosevelt to Schiff, Dec. 14, 1905. Morison, op. cit., v.5, p. 112.Google Scholar
18. Foreign Relations, 59 Congress, 2 session, Washington, 1909, pt. 2, p. 1297.Google Scholar
19. Foreign Relations, p. 1300 ff.Google Scholar
20. Quoted in Roosevelt to Schiff, July 26, 1906. Morison, op. cit., v.5, p. 336.Google Scholar
21. Foreign Relations, op. cit., p. 1313.Google Scholar
22. Foreign Relations, 59 Congress, 1 session, pp. 678–681.Google Scholar
23. Root to White, Nov. 28, 1905. Root Papers, Box 302, Letter Press Book “Specially Confidential.”Google Scholar
24.Gooch, G.P. and Temperly, H., British Documents on the Origins of the War, 1898–1914, London, 1928, v.3, pp. 329–330. See also Adler and Margalith, op.cit., pp. 36–41.Google Scholar
25. See Roosevelt to Hughes, Oct. 2 and Oct. 5, 1906. Roosevelt to Oscar Straus, Oct. 9, 1906. Morison, op.cit., v.5, pp. 439–454. Also Root to T. L. Woodruff, Oct. 12, 1906. Root Papers, Box 301, Letter Press Book.Google Scholar
26. Documents cited here may be seen in Foreign Relations, 61 Congress, 2 session, Washington, 1914, pp. 513–523. See also T.A. Bailey, American Faces Russia, Ithaca, New York, 1950, Ch. 18.Google Scholar
27. Roosevelt to Root, Sept. 5 and Sept. 25, 1908. Morison, op.cit., v.6, pp. 1207, 1256.Google Scholar
28. See McGuire, James K., member of advisory committee to the Democratic National Committee on the 1908 election, to W. J. Bryan, Jan. 13 and Jan. 23, 1909. Library of Congress, Papers of William Jennings Bryan, Box 28, General Correspondence.Google Scholar
29. Taft to Knox, Dec. 22, 1908. Library of Congress, Papers of Philander Chase Knox, Acc. 3686, v.6.Google Scholar
30. Taft to J. Meyer, Feb. 12, 1912, Library of Congress, Papers of William Howard Taft, Box 479, Series 2, File 2677.Google Scholar
31. See Taft Papers, Box 374, Series 2, File 423.Google Scholar
32. U.S. Congress, Senate, Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearings, Brewing and Liquor Interests and German Propaganda, 65 Congress, 2 and 3 sessions, Washington, 1919. See also R. E. Park, The Immigrant Press and its Control, New York, 1922, pp. 376 ff.Google Scholar
33. The writer is preparing a larger work on the Irish as a factor in Anglo-American Relations, 1899–1921.Google Scholar
34. Unsigned and undated memorandum, “The Russian Treaty of 1832 and its Interpretation,” Knox Papers, Acc. 9172, Box 3.Google Scholar
35. Unsigned and undated memorandum. Knox Papers, Acc. 9172 Box 5. See also Adler and Margalith, op.cit. They discuss the abrogation issue, pp. 277–291.Google Scholar
36. Porter, and Johnson, , op. cit. pp. 133, 148.Google Scholar
37. Ibid., pp. 139, 161.Google Scholar
38. Hay to Root, June 6, 1904. Root Papers, Box 226.Google Scholar
39. This legal problem is reviewed in a State Department memorandum prepared for Knox and dated May 28, 1910, “Humanitarian and Advanced Policy of the United States in regard to the Right of Expatriation and the treatment of Jews in Foreign Countries.” Knox Papers, Acc. 9172, Box 4.Google Scholar
40. U. S., Congress, Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, Hearings, Treaty of 1832 with Russia, 62 Congress, 2 session, Washington, 1911.Google Scholar
41. Unsigned and undated memorandum, “Editorial comment on the Jewish Question.” Knox Papers, Acc. 1972, Box 2.Google Scholar
42. Footnote 34. Cohen, Naomi W., “The Abrogation of the Russo-American Treaty of 1832” Jewish Social Studies, v.XXV, No. 1, January 1963, illustrates Rockhill's bias in favour of the Russian Government's position.Google Scholar
43. Adler, and Margalith, , op.cit., pp. 278–280.Google Scholar
44. Knox to Taft, November 28, 1911. Knox Papers, Acc. 9172, Box 5. See the American Journal of International Law, v.VI, 1912, for a discussion of the legal versus political aspects of the case. Cited by Laserson, M. M., The American Impact on Russia, New York, 1957, in his discussion of abrogation, pp. 353–371.Google Scholar
45. These documents may be found in Foreign Relations, 62 Congress, 2 Session, Washington, 1918, pp. 695–699. See also Adler and Margalith, pp. 286–289.Google Scholar
46. Adler, and Margalith, , op.cit., p. 286.Google Scholar
47. Bailey, op.cit., p. 220. Laserson, op.cit., pp. 355–356.Google Scholar
48. See Kondacheff, N., Russian Embassy, to Wilson, State Department, May 26, 1911. Knox Papers, Acc. 9172, Box. 5.Google Scholar
49. For a detailed study of the Jewish lobby see Naomi W. Cohen, op.cit.Google Scholar
50.Gwynn, S., ed., The Letters and Friendships of Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, London, 1929, v.2, p. 201.Google Scholar
51.Florinsky, M. T., Russia: A History and an Interpretation, New York, 1948, pp. 1203 and 1287.Google Scholar