Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T16:51:03.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PM Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

S. Flett
S. Flett*
Affiliation:
Chairman Joint Committee Royal College of Psychiatrists and British Psychological Society
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

After the introductory talks and for the early part of the afternoon participants split into five speciality groups. All groups had one or two psychologists and psychiatrists acting as facilitators. Facilitators were given detailed briefs to encourage a structured and constructive response to certain themes across the groups. This brief is available from the College or the BPS. I was allowed a roving observer's role between the groups and was asked to report back on the final plenary session. The account which follows is a personal view intended to give the flavour of the proceedings.

Type
The College
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 1987 , pp. 212
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1987
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.