Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:03:14.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A tonal analysis of Gurung, with separate systems for register and contour pitch features1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

R. K. Sprigg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Gurung language made its Bulletin début in 1955 with an article by Burton-Page: ‘Two studies in Gurungkura: I. tone; II. rhotacization and retroflexion’ (BSOAS, 17/1, 1955, 111ff.). Since tone is the subject of one of these studies, it might seem that there would be little point in adding a further study of that same topic, important though it is; but a different dialect can lead to a considerable difference in the appearance of Gurung phonology as a whole, and so, too, can a difference in technique of analysis. As Burton-Page himself writes: ‘it should be mentioned that the material presented here is relevant only to the Ghandrung dialect, which of the four or five major Gurungkura dialects is accorded the greatest prestige-value by the Gurungs themselves’; his informant was G./Lieut. Ganesh Gurung, M.C., 1/2nd K. E. O. Goorkha Rifles (Burton-Page, 1955: 111).

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , October 1997 , pp. 448 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burton-Page, J. 1955. ‘Two studies in Gurungkura: I. tone; II. rhotacization and retroflexion’, BSOAS, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, W. W. 1970. ‘Gurung tone and higher levels’, Occasional papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman linguistics, (ed.) , A. Hale and IIIPike, K. L., 1, 52–73. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Glover, W. W. and Landon, A. K. 1980. ‘Gurung dialects’ (Pacific Linguistics, Series A53), 29–77. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Glover, W. W., Glover, J. R. and Gurung, D. B. 1977. Gurung-Nepali-English dictionary, with English–Gurung and Nepali–Gurung indexes, Pacific Linguistics, Series C, no. 51. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Gurung, H. B. 1980. Vignettes of Nepal. Kathmandu: Sajha Prakashan.Google Scholar
Hinton, B. C. 1970. ‘Spectrographic confirmation of pitch and breathiness in Gurung’, OPWSTBL, 74–81.Google Scholar
Hutt, M. J. 1988. Nepali, London: School of Oriental and African Studies; New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private, Ltd.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, M. 1973. Phonologie Tamang. Paris: Société d'Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, M. 1978. ‘Consonantal mutations and tonal split in the Tamang sub-family of Tibeto-Burman’, Kailash, 6/3, 157–180.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1981. ‘The Chang-Shefts tonal analysis, and the pitch variation of the Lhasa-Tibetan tones’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 6/1, 49–59.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K., 1990. ‘Tone in Tamang and Tibetan, and the advantages of keeping register-based tone systems separate from contour-based tone systems’, LTBA, 13/1, 33–56.Google Scholar
Subba, S. 1983. ‘Census and the Linguistic Survey of Nepal -perspectives on language use’ [paper submitted to the fourth Annual Conference of the Linguistic Society of Nepal].Google Scholar
SirTuker, F. 1957. Gorkha, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Turner, R. L. 1931. A comparative and etymological dictionary of the Nepali language. London: Royal Asiatic Society. [Republished 1980: Bombay, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Calcutta, New Delhi, Madras: Allied Publishers, Private, Ltd.]Google Scholar