Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:21:21.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The literary form of prayer: Qur՚ān sūra one, the Lord's Prayer and a Babylonian prayer to the Moon God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

S. Sperl
S. Sperl
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his article ‘Lecture de la Fātiḥa’ Muhammad Arkoun develops principles for a contemporary rereading of scripture which differ markedly from those of classical exegesis. The latter rests upon the dogmatic certainty that scripture constitutes the only truth and the whole truth; hence it sees its task as rendering this truth accessible by recourse to a wide range of explanatory techniques. Arkoun's principles, on the other hand, are based upon the realization that in the present circumstances man's understanding of himself must be acquired not by remaining within the fold of one assumed source of truth but by transcending the panoply of ‘biophysical, economic, political, linguistic constraints’ which delimit his condition. As result, such knowledge must consist in repeated and risky forays ‘beyond the enclosures which all cultural traditions tend to erect after a phase of intensive elaboration’ (Arkoun, 1982: 50).

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 213 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arkoun, M. 1982. ‘Lecture de la Fātiḥa’, in Lectures du Coran. Paris: G.-P.Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Ali, Abdallah Youssuf. 1937. The glorious Kur'ān: translation and commentary. Lahore: Islamic Propagation Centre.Google Scholar
Baumstark, A. 1927. ‘Jüdischer und christlicher Gebetstypus im Koran’, Der Islam, 16, 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, N.C. 1979. Hinduism: a religion to live by. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kathīr, Ibn, Ismaĩl, Ḥāfiẓ ՙImād al-Dīn Abū ՚I-Fidā. 1393/1973. Mukhtaṣar tafsīr lbn Kathīr, ed. al-Ṣābūni, M. A.. Beirut: Dār al-Qurān al-Karīm.Google Scholar
Jeremias, J. 1960 ‘The Lord's Prayer in modern research’, Expository Times, 81, no.5, 141–6.Google Scholar
Jungmann, J.A. 1959. The Mass of the Roman Rite. London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
Finkel, A. 1981. ‘The Prayer of Jesus in Matthew’, in Finkel, A. and Frixell, L. (ed.), Standing before God: studies on prayer in scriptures and in tradition [Festschrift J.M.Oesterreicher] New York: Ktav Pub. House 132–69.Google Scholar
Gadd, C.J. 1958. ‘The Harran inscriptions of Nabonidus’, Anatolian Studies, VIII, 35–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Hamid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. 1987. al-Maqṣid al-asnā fi sharḥ asmā Allāh al-huṣnā, ed. al-Jābī, Bassām ՙAbd al-Wahhāb. Limassol: al-Jaffān.Google Scholar
Gonda, J. 1963 ‘The Indian Mantra (Helmut Ritter zum 70. Geburtstag)’, Oriens, 16, 244–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E.G. 1925. ‘Shemoneh ‘Esre’, The Jewish encyclopedia, Vol. XI, 270–82.Google Scholar
al-Khāzin, Alā՚ al-Dīn ՙAlī b. Muḥammad b. Ibrahīm. 1910. Lubab al-taՙwīl fī maՙānī al-tanzīl. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-ՙArabiyya al-Kubrā.Google Scholar
Klima, I. 1992. My golden trades. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Liefeld, W.L. 1986. ‘Lord's Prayer’, in The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Lohmeyer, E. 1946. Das Vater-unser. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Mayer, W. 1976. Untersuchungen zur Formensprache der babylonischen ‘Gebetsbeschwörungen’. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, T. 1909. Geschichte des Qor'ans, zweite Auflage bearbeitet von F. Schwally. Leipzig: T. Weicher.Google Scholar
Paret, R. 1965. ‘Fātiha’, Encylopedia of Islam (2nd ed.). Vol. II, 841. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pritchard, J.B. 1969. Ancient Near Eastern texts relating to the Old Testament. [Third edition with supplement.] Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, U. 1993. ‘Exegesis and hadīth-the case of the seven Mathani’, in Approaches to the Qur'ān, Hawting, G.R. and Shareef, Abdul-Kader A. (ed.), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saravia, A. 1980. Popol Wuh: ancient stories of the Quiche Indians of Guatemala. Guatemala City: Editorial Piedra Santa.Google Scholar
Smith, C.W.F. 1962. ‘Lord's Prayer’, The interpreter's dictionary of the Bible. Vol.3, 154–8. New York: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Tabarī, Abū Jaՙfar Muḥammmd b. Jarīr. 1905. Jāmiՙ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Qur'ān. Cairo: Bulaq.Google Scholar
Wellhausen, J. (ed.) 1887. Reste arabischen Heidentums. Repr. 1961. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, H. (1928) ‘Fātiḥa und Vaterunser’, Zeitschrift für Semitistik, 6, 238–46.Google Scholar