No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
This article is a review of V. S. Vorob'ev-Desjatovskij and M. I. Vorob'eva-Desjatovskaja's Skazanie o Bxadre (novye listy sakskoj rukopisi E).1 This recent publication of what is in large part a facsimile volume of Old Khotanese is greatly to be welcomed. We now have at last facsimiles of all the 192 folios (actually 191, see below) in Leningrad that constitute the major part of a Buddhist miscellany written in the oldest type of Khotanese. 173 of the Leningrad folios were seen by E. Leumann and described in detail in 1912.2 18 of these folios (33640, 34254), together with two (334, 335) from the Asiatic Society of Bengal in Calcutta, were edited and translated by E. Leumann in 1919.3 These formed all the extant part of what on Leumann's calculation was ch. 23 of the surviving portion of the MS, which he had christened E after the signature he allotted to the first folios he saw, 269 and 335 from Calcutta. All the folios known to Leumann were edited and translated by him in 19336 in Das nordarische {sakische) Lehrgedicht des Buddhismus. This included all the 173 Leningrad folios, of which he had taken photographs.Only a few of these were published in facsimile (256v, 257r, 258v, 259r, 303v, 304r, the right halves of 257v, 258r, and the left halves of 259v, 260r) by his son M. Leumann in a private publication, Sakische Handschriftproben, Zrich, 1934. These photographs are excellent, but the folios chosen were particularly favourable for reproduction, and nothing is lost except an insignificant amount of clarity in the facsimiles of the same folios in the present volume.
1 Vorob'ev-Desjatovskij, V. S. and Vorob'eva-Desjatovskaja, M. I. (ed. and tr.): Skazanie o Bxadre (nave listy sakskoj rukopiai E). (Akademija Nauk SSSR. Otdelenie Istorii. Institut Narodov Azii. Pamjatniki Pis'mennosti Vostoka, I.) 301 pp. + errata slip. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka, 1965. Rbls. 1.80. (The responsible editors were L. G. Gercenberg and V. A. Livic.)Google Scholar
2 Leumann, E., Zur nordarisch, en Sprache and Literatur, Strassburg, 1912, 1115.Google Scholar
3 Leumann, E., Maitreya-samiti, das Zukunftsid, eal der Buddhisten, Strassburg, 1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 I have noticed only rracyeinstead of rravye in E 20.7 and pant, tcampha instead of pan, tcamph in E 25.414. tu instead of ttu was noted in the glossary and on p. xxxix. On p. xxxix, metrai instead of mtrai was corrected for E 23.280 but not for 23.282; both were, however, correct in Maitreya-samiti, p. 73. In E 6.46 I prefer to read bihamtte for bihạnte, tnte