Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:19:19.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It’s Time for Empirical Research in Business Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Larue Tone Hosmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We have a very decent belief structure or general paradigm underlying Business Ethics as a formal field of study. It has an explicit moral base. It can be stated in simple and direct terms. It has been developed over a number of recent years by a group of respected scholars from a variety of academic disciplines. It is, however, subject to multiple interpretations and open to extensive conflicts. We can easily tolerate if not benefit from the differing interpretations. We must—at some point—moderate if not resolve the debilitating conflicts. The argument I wish to make in this paper is that we have reached that point. It is time to resolve the conflicts, and the way to do so is to generate awkward, undeniable facts through basic empirical research. Those facts will then have to be incorporated into acceptable—and eventually accepted—theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 233 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, Wroe. 1965. Dynamic Marketing Behavior Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. and Hansen, M. H. 1994. Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal 15: 175–190.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. L. 1994. When Integration Fails. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 157–170.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. L. and Preston, L. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. L. 1999. Making Stakeholder Theory Whole. Academy of Management Review 24: 237–241.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1995. Stakeholder Thinking: The State of the Art. In Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, ed. Nasi, Juha, pp. 35–46. Helsinki: LSR Julkasut Oy.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1999. Divergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review 24: 233–236.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E. 1991. Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 53–73.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. 1994. What If the Academy Actually Mattered? Academy of Management Review 19: 11–16.Google Scholar
Hosmer, L. T. 1994. Moral Leadership in Business. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
Hosmer, L. T. 1995. Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. Academy of Management Review 20: 379–403.Google Scholar
Hosmer, L. T. 1996. 5 Years, 20 issues, 141 Articles, and What? Business Ethics Quarterly 6: 325–358.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review 20: 404–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. and Wicks, A. C. 1999. Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review 24: 206–221.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1964. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mayo, E.; Rothlisberger, F. J.; and Dickson, W. T. 1938. Management and the Worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nasi, J., ed. 1995. Understanding Stakeholder Thinking. Helsinki: LSR Julkasut Oy.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review 68: 79–91.Google Scholar
Rumelt, Richard P. 1974. Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. 1994. “The Corporation as Community: A Reply to Ed Hartman. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 271–286.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. W. 1911. Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper Brothers Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K. and Weaver, G. R. 1999. The Stakeholder Research Tradition: Converging Theorists—Not Convergent Theory. Academy of Management Review 24: 222–227.Google Scholar
Victor, B. and Stephens, C. U. 1994. Business Ethics: A Synthesis of Normative Philosophy and Empirical Social Science. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, G. R. and Trevino, L. K. 1994. Normative and Empirical Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1994. The Normative/Descriptive Distinction in Methodologies of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 175–180.Google Scholar