Article contents
Birth of an Employers' Association
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
Abstract
The forces that originally impelled manufacturers to unite were often of fleeting impact and were soon replaced by the cohesive influence of new issues. The NAM, conceived to wage a tariff war, discovered in organized labor a common enemy for its members and traced its prosperity from the date it became a gladiator in the labor arena.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1959
References
1 Proceedings of the 31st Annual Convention of the National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America, 1926, p. 61; 1904, pp. 243–244; 1920, p. 27. [Hereafter referred to as Proceedings.]
2 NAM News, Feb. 26, 1944, p. 7. The railroads of the country “recognizing the importance” of subsequent conventions made a rate of a fare and one third for the round trip of all members and their families and allowed a 50 per cent discount to men traveling to attend the NAM conventions (American Industries, May 1, 1906, p. 2).
3 The purposes listed were: conservation of the home market, extension of our foreign trade, improvement of the consular service, expert commercial agents abroad, promotion of Spanish-American trade, re-establishment of reciprocity treaties, extension of our merchant marine, improvement of waterways, construction of the Nicaragua Canal, creation of manufacturers and commerce department in government, uniform freight classification, and passage of a national bankruptcy law (Circular of Information, No. 1, June 15, 1896, pp. 1–8).
4 American Industries, Oct., 1929, p. 15.
5 Proceedings, 1920, p. 29; 1926, p. 61.
6 Proceedings, 1901, pp. 23–24.
7 Wolman, Leo, The Growth of American Trade Unions, 1880–1923 (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1924), pp. 33–34Google Scholar.
8 Proceedings, 1904, p. 15.
9 See Proceedings, 1910, p. 134; 1915, p. 172; American Industries, June, 1911, p. 11; Dec, 1912, p. 23; June, 1915, p. 30.
10 Bonnett, Clarence E., Employers' Associations in the United States (New York, 1922), p. 301Google Scholar.
11 U. S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Education and Labor, Eight Hours for Laborers on Government Work, Hearings before the Committee on Education and Labor, U. S. Senate, 57th Cong., 1st Sess. (Washington, 1902), pp. 23–24Google Scholar.
12 Mittelman, Edward B., “Trade Unionism,” in Commons, John R. and Associates, History of Labour in the United States, 1896–1932 (4 vols.; New York, 1918–1935), Vol. I, Part III, p. 401Google Scholar.
13 Bonnett, Clarence E., “Employers' Associations,” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Seligman, R. A. and Johnson, Alvin, Vol. V (1931), p. 509Google Scholar.
14 Mittelman, op. cit., p. 402.
15 Saposs, David J., “Colonial and Federal Beginnings,” in Commons, op. cit., Vol. II, Part I, p. 26Google Scholar.
16 Perlman, Selig, “Upheaval and Reorganization,” Commons, op. cit., Vol. II, Part VI, p. 195Google Scholar.
17 Bonnett, Employers' Associations in the U.S., pp. 22–23.
18 Quoted in American Industries, Aug. 1, 1903, p. 14.
19 Bonnett, Employers' Associations in the U.S., p. 24.
20 Proceedings, 1903, in Commons, p. 315.
21 Perlman and Taft, in Commons, op. cit., pp. 129–134.
22 American Industries, July, 1911, p. 37.
23 Proceedings, 1903, pp. 17–18.
24 Proceedings, 1903, p. 16.
25 Proceedings, 1903, pp. 15–16.
26 Proceedings, 1903, p. 133.
27 Proceedings, 1903, pp. 166–167.
28 Proceedings, 1903, pp. 165–166. No. 9 was inserted by the 1904 convention, Proceedings, 1904, p. 173.
29 Proceedings, 1926, p. 62.
30 Proceedings, 1906, p. 135.
31 Proceedings, 1900–1907, passim.
32 Proceedings, 1896–1907, passim.
- 5
- Cited by