Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:52:45.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinventing Entrepreneurial History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

R. Daniel Wadhwani  and
Christina Lubinski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on entrepreneurship remains fragmented in business history. A lack of conceptual clarity inhibits comparisons between studies and dialogue among scholars. To address these issues, we propose to reinvent entrepreneurial history as a research field. We define “new entrepreneurial history” as the study of the creative processes that propel economic change. Rather than putting actors, hierarchies, or institutions at the center of the analysis, we focus explicitly on three distinct entrepreneurial processes as primary objects of study: envisioning and valuing opportunities, allocating and reconfiguring resources, and legitimizing novelty. The article elaborates on the historiography, premises, and potential contributions of new entrepreneurial history.

Keywords

entrepreneurshipentrepreneurial processeshistorytheorytemporalityuncertaintyagencyopportunityresourceslegitimation
Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , Winter 2017 , pp. 767 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jones, Geoffrey and Wadhwani, R. Daniel, “Entrepreneurship,” in The Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones, Geoffrey and Zeitlin, Jonathan (New York, 2008), 501–28Google Scholar.

2 Cassis, Youssef and Minoglou, Ioanna Pepelasis, eds., Entrepreneurship in Theory and History (Basingstoke, U.K., 2005)Google Scholar; Casson, Mark, Entrepreneurship: Theory, Networks, History (Cheltenham, U.K., 2010)Google Scholar; Friedman, Walter A. and Jones, Geoffrey, “Business History: Time for Debate,” Business History Review 85, no. 1 (2011): 1–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Casson, Mark and Casson, Catherine, The Entrepreneur in History: From Medieval Merchant to Modern Business Leader (Basingstoke and Hampshire, U.K., 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wadhwani, R. Daniel and Jones, Geoffrey, “Schumpeter's Plea: Historical Reasoning in Entrepreneurship Theory and Research,” in Organizations in Time: History, Theory, and Methods, ed. Bucheli, Marcelo and Wadhwani, R. Daniel (Oxford, 2013), 192–216 Google Scholar.

3 Landström, Hans and Lohrke, Franz, eds., Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurship Research (Cheltenham, U.K., 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 R. Daniel Wadhwani, “Historical Reasoning and the Development of Entrepreneurship Theory,” in Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurship Research, 343–62.

5 For an overview, see Shionoya, Yūichi, ed., The German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics (London and New York, 2001)Google Scholar; Shionoya, Yūichi, The Soul of the German Historical School: Methodological Essays on Schmoller, Weber, and Schumpeter (New York, 2005)Google Scholar; Koslowski, Peter, Methodology of the Social Sciences, Ethics, and Economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker (Berlin and New York, 1997)Google Scholar; Nau, Heino Heinrich and Schefold, Bertram, eds., The Historicity of Economics: Continuities and Discontinuities of Historical Thought in 19th and 20th Century Economics (Berlin and New York, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Though both the English and German Historical Schools called for greater attention to the agency of the entrepreneur, our focus here is on the infuence of the German Historical School.

6 Others included Etienne Laspeyres, Karl Bücher, Adolph Wagner, and Georg Friedrich Knapp.

7 Schumpeter, Joseph A., Economic Doctrine and Method: An Historical Sketch, trans. Aris, R. (New York, 1954 [First German edition: 1912]), 175–80Google Scholar. For the program of the historicists, see also Ebner, Alexander, “Schumpeter and the ‘Schmollerprogramm’: Integrating Theory and History in the Analysis of Economic Development,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, no. 3 (2000): 355–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Yūichi Shionoya, “A Methodological Appraisal of Schmoller's Research Program,” in The Soul of the German Historical School, 13–30.

8 Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin, How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science (London and New York, 2002)Google Scholar.

9 Wadhwani, “Historical Reasoning,” 343–62.

10 Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 5th ed. (London, 1976 [1943])Google Scholar; Schumpeter, Joseph A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Cambridge, Mass., 1936 [first published in German, 1911])Google Scholar. For the development of Schumpeter's thoughts over time see, McCraw, Thomas K., Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction (Cambridge, Mass., 2007)Google Scholar.

11 Schumpeter, Joseph A., History of Economic Analysis (New York, 1954), 780 Google Scholar.

12 Quoted from English translation in Ramon J. Betanzos, “Wilhelm Dilthey: An Introduction,” in Dilthey, Wilhelm, Introduction to the Human Sciences: An Attempt to Lay a Foundation for the Study of Society and History, trans. Betanzos, Ramon J. (Detroit, 1988), 13 Google Scholar.

13 Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof, “Introduction to Volume III,” in Dilthey, Wilhelm, The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences (Princeton, N.J., 2002), 9–10 Google Scholar.

14 Schumpeter, Joseph A., “The Creative Response in Economic History,” Journal of Economic History 7, no. 2 (1947): 149–59Google Scholar.

15 Jones, and Wadhwani, , “Entrepreneurship;” Sass, Steven, Entrepreneurial Historians and History: Leadership and Rationality in American Economic Historiography (New York, 1986)Google Scholar; Fredona, Robert and Reinert, Sophus, “The Harvard Research Center in Entrepreneurial History and the Daimonic Entrepreneur,” History of Political Economy 49, no. 2 (2017): 267–314 Google Scholar.

16 Sass, Entrepreneurial Historians; Cochran, Thomas C., “Cultural Factors in Economic Growth,” Journal of Economic History 20, no. 4 (1960): 515–30Google Scholar; Landes, David S., “French Entrepreneurship and Industrial Growth in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Economic History 9, no. 1 (1949): 45–61 Google Scholar; Landes, David S., The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (London, 1969)Google Scholar.

17 Wadhwani, “Historical Reasoning,” 343–62.

18 Gerschenkron, Alexander, “Social Attitudes, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development,” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History 6 (1953/54): 1–19 Google Scholar.

19 Wadhwani, “Historical Reasoning,” 343–62.

20 Harvey, Charles, “Business History and the Problem of Entrepreneurship: The Case of the Rio Tinto Company, 1873–1939,” Business History 21, no. 1 (1979): 3–22 Google Scholar.

21 Landström, Hans, “Pioneers in Entrepreneurship Research,” in Crossroads of Entrepreneurship, ed. Corbetta, Guido, Huse, Morton, and Ravasi, Davide (New York, 2005), 13–31 Google Scholar; Landström and Lohrke, Historical Foundations.

22 Casson, Mark, The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham, U.K., and Northhampton, Mass., 2003)Google Scholar; Casson, Entrepreneurship. For the reception in business history, see also Alvarez, Sharon, Godley, Andrew, and Wright, Mike, “Mark Casson: The Entrepreneur at 30—Continued Relevance?” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 8, no. 2 (2014): 185–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Mark Casson and Andrew Godley, “Entrepreneurship and Historical Explanation,” in Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, 25–60; Godley, Andrew, “Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Implicit Contracts, and Market Making for Complex Consumer Goods,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7, no. 4 (2013): 273–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Jones, Geoffrey, Multinationals and Global Capitalism: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century (Oxford and New York, 2005), 13–14 Google Scholar; Casson and Casson, The Entrepreneur in History; Casson, Mark and Casson, Catherine, History of Entrepreneurship: Innovation and Risk-Taking, 1200–2000 (Cheltenham, U.K., 2013)Google Scholar.

25 Cuff, Robert D., “Notes for a Panel on Entrepreneurship in Business History,” Business History Review 76, no. 1 (2002): 123–32Google Scholar. McCraw, Prophet of Innovation.

26 Popp, Andrew and Holt, Robin, “The Presence of Entrepreneurial Opportunity,” Business History 55, no. 1 (2013): 9–28 Google Scholar; Raff, Daniel M. G., “How to Do Things with Time,” Enterprise & Society 14, no. 3 (2013): 435–66Google Scholar.

27 Welter, Friederike, “Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35, no. 1 (2011): 165–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Welter, Friederike and Gartner, William B., eds., A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Context (Cheltenham, U.K., 2016)Google Scholar. Dimov, Dimo, “Grappling With the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 35, no. 1 (2011): 57–81 Google Scholar.

28 Galambos, Louis and Amatori, Franco, “The Entrepreneurial Multiplier,” Enterprise & Society 17, no. 4 (2016): 763–808 Google Scholar; Friedman and Jones, “Business History: Time for Debate,” 1–8; Graham, Margaret, “Entrepreneurship in the United States, 1920–2000,” in The Invention of Enterprise: Entrepreneurship from Ancient Mesopotamia to Modern Times, ed. Headrick, Daniel R., Mokyr, Joel, and Baumol, William J. (Princeton, N.J., 2010)Google Scholar.

29 McClelland, David C. “Characteristics of Successful Entrepreneurs,” The Journal of Creative Behavior 21, no. 3 (1987): 219–33Google Scholar.

30 Gartner, William B., “Who Is an Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 13, no. 4 (1989): 47–68 Google Scholar.

31 Stevenson, Howard H. and Jarillo, J. Carlos, “A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management,” Strategic Management Journal 11, no. 4 (1990): 17–27 Google Scholar; Shane, Scott and Venkataraman, Sankaran, “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research,” Academy of Management Review 25, no. 1 (2000): 217–26Google Scholar.

32 On processes as objects of research see Abbott, Andrew D., Processual Sociology (Chicago, 2016)Google Scholar. Though we treat the study of mechanisms and processes synonymously, Abbott distinguishes between them. See Abbott, Andrew D., “Mechanisms and Relations,” Sociologica 2 (Sept.–Oct., 2007): 1–22 Google Scholar.

33 Popp and Holt, “Presence”; Popp, Andrew and Holt, Robin, “Emotion, Sensibility, and the Family Firm: Josiah Wedgwood and Sons,” Business History 55, no. 6 (2013): 892–909 Google Scholar; Beckert, Jens, Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics (Cambridge, Mass., 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Raff, “How to Do Things with Time”; Dimov, “Grappling With the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities.”

35 Knight, Frank H., Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (Boston and New York, 1921)Google Scholar.

36 Koselleck, Reinhart, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (New York, 2004)Google Scholar; Emirbayer, Mustafa and Mische, Ann, “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103, no. 4 (1998): 962–1023 Google Scholar.

37 For a discussion of structure vs. agency in entrepreneurial history, see Hesse, Jan-Otmar, “Die ‘Seele des Unternehmens': Das stille Unternehmertum Hans Ringiers,” in Unternehmer—Fakten und Fiktionen: Historisch-biografische Studien [Facts and Fictions about Entrepreneurs: Historical Biographical Studies], ed. Plumpe, Werner (Berlin, 2014)Google Scholar.

38 Baumol, William J., “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive,” Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5 (1990): 893–921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schumpeter, “Creative Response,” 153.

39 Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent, On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton, N.J., 2006)Google Scholar.

40 Cole, Arthur, Business Enterprise in Its Social Setting (Cambridge, Mass., 1959)Google Scholar; Wadhwani and Jones, “Schumpeter's Plea,” 192–216; and Galambos and Amatori, “The Entrepreneurial Multiplier.” For critical examination of these concepts see also, R. Daniel Wadhwani, “Gales, Streams and Multipliers: Conceptual Metaphors in Entrepreneurial History,” Enterprise & Society (forthcoming).

41 Lippmann, Stephen and Aldrich, Howard, “A Rolling Stone Gathers Momentum: Generational Units, Collective Memory, and Entrepreneurship,” Academy of Management Review 41, no. 4 (2016): 658–75Google Scholar.

42 Garud, Raghu, Kumaraswamy, Arun, and Karnøe, Peter, “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47, no. 4 (2010): 760–74Google Scholar.

43 de Guevara, Carlos Dávila L., Empresas y empresarios en la historia de Colombia: Siglos XIX–XX: Una colección de estudios recientes, 2 vols., Colección Vitral (Bogotá, 2003)Google Scholar; Abelshauser, Werner, Nach dem Wirtschaftswunder: Der Gewerkschafter, Politiker und Unternehmer Hans Matthöfer (Bonn, 2009)Google Scholar; Uwe Spiekermann, “Claus Spreckels: Robber Baron and Sugar King,” in Immigrant Entrepreneurship: German-American Business Biographies, 1720 to the Present, vol. 2, ed. William J. Hausman and German Historical Institute, http://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entry.php?rec=5, last modified May 30, 2013. Neither the biography nor the field of the new entrepreneurial history are limited to the level of the individual. Biographies, carefully constructed, can depart from the individual to explain change in organizations, institutions, and capitalist societies. However, they seem to have been marginalized in recent years and are only slowly making a comeback. See Pertilla, Atiba and Spiekermann, Uwe, “Living the American Dream? The Challenge of Writing Biographies of German-American Immigrant Entrepreneurs,” Bulletin of the German Historical Institute 55 (2014): 77–90 Google Scholar.

44 Shane and Venkataraman, “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research,” 217–26; Dimov, “Grappling With the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities”; Alvarez, Sharon A. and Barney, Jay B., “Discovery and Creation: Alternative Theories of Entrepreneurial Action,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1 (Nov. 2007): 11–26 Google Scholar.

45 Mintz, Sidney Wilfred, Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History (New York, 1986)Google Scholar.

46 Kaplan, Sarah and Murray, Fiona, “Entrepreneurship and the Construction of Value in Biotechnology,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 29 (2010): 107–47Google Scholar; Beckert, Jens and Aspers, Patrik, eds., The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy (New York, 2011)Google Scholar; Khaire, Mukti and Wadhwani, R. Daniel, “Changing Landscapes: The Construction of Meaning and Value in a New Market Category—Modern Indian Art,” Academy of Management Journal 53, no. 6 (2010): 1281–1304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Jones, Geoffrey, Profits and Sustainability: A History of Green Entrepreneurship (Oxford, 2017)Google Scholar; Wadhwani, R. Daniel, Galvez-Behar, Gabriel, Mercelis, Joris, and Guagnini, Anna, “Academic Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change in Historical Perspective,” Management & Organizational History 12, no. 3 (2017): 175–98Google Scholar.

48 Collingwood, R. G. and Knox, T. M., The Idea of History (Oxford, 1946)Google Scholar.

49 Levi, Giovanni, “Microhistory and the Recovery of Complexity,” in Historical Knowledge: In Quest of Theory, Method and Evidence, ed. Fellman, Susanna and Rahikainen, Marjatta (Newcastle upon Tyne, 2012), 121–32Google Scholar.

50 Dimov, “Grappling With the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities.” See also Popp and Holt, “Presence.”

51 Historical research that grapples with how people envisioned their futures includes Friedman, Walter A., Fortune Tellers: The Story of America's First Economic Forecasters (Princeton, N.J., 2014)Google Scholar; Hansen, Per H., Danish Modern Furniture, 1930–2016: The Rise, Decline and Re-emergence of a Cultural Market Category (Odense, 2018)Google Scholar; Müller, Simone M. and Tworek, Heidi J. S., “Imagined Use as a Category of Analysis: New Approaches to the History of Technology,” History and Technology 32, no. 2 (2016): 105–19Google Scholar.

52 R. Daniel Wadhwani and Marcelo Bucheli, “The Future of the Past in Management and Organizational Studies,” in Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, 3–30; Raff, “How to Do Things with Time.”

53 Carr, David, Time, Narrative, and History (Bloomington, Ind., 1986.)Google Scholar

54 Ellan Spero, “An Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Process: The Creation of an Industrial Fellowship Through Correspondence in Early Twentieth Century America,” Management & Organizational History (forthcoming.)

55 Hansen, Per H., “Business History: A Cultural and Narrative Approach,” Business History Review 86, no. 4 (2012): 693–717 Google Scholar; Mordhorst, Mads, “From Counterfactual History to Counter-Narrative History,” Management & Organizational History 3, no. 1 (2008): 5–26 Google Scholar; Hjorth, Daniel and Steyaert, Chris, eds., Narrative and Discursive Approaches in Entrepreneurship (Cheltenham, U.K., and Northampton, Mass., 2004)Google Scholar; Holt, Robin and MacPherson, Allan, “Sensemaking, Rhetoric and the Socially Competent Entrepreneur,” International Small Business Journal 28, no. 1 (2010): 20–42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Gartner, William B., “Entrepreneurial Narrative and a Science of the Imagination,” Journal of Business Venturing 22, no. 5 (2007): 613–27Google Scholar.

56 Ricœur, Paul, Time and Narrative (Chicago, 1984.)Google Scholar

57 Cornelissen, Joep P. and Clarke, Jean S., “Imagining and Rationalizing Opportunities: Inductive Reasoning and the Creation and Justification of New Ventures,” Academy of Management Review 35, no. 4 (2010): 539–57Google Scholar.

58 Popp and Holt, “Emotion”; Frevert, Ute, “Passions, Preferences, and Animal Spirits: How Does Homo Oeconomicus Cope with Emotions?” in Science and Emotions after 1945: A Transatlantic Perspective, ed. Biess, Frank and Gross, Daniel M. (Chicago, 2014), 300–307 Google Scholar. See also the discussion of Fritz Redlich in Fredona and Reinert, “Harvard Research Center,” 290–98.

59 Lipartito, Kenneth, “Connecting the Cultural and the Material in Business History,” Enterprise & Society 14, no. 4 (2013): 686–704 Google Scholar.

60 Waldron, Darryl and Hubbard, Carl M., “Valuation Methods and Estimates in Relationship to Investing Versus Consulting,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 16, no. 1 (1991): 43–52 Google Scholar.

61 Balleisen, Edward J., Navigating Failure: Bankruptcy and Commercial Society in Antebellum America. (Chapel Hill, N.C., 2001)Google Scholar.

62 Levy, Jonathan, Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America (Cambridge, Mass., 2012)Google Scholar; Sandage, Scott A., Born Losers: A History of Failure in America (Cambridge, Mass., 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Baker, Ted and Nelson, Reed E., “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage,” Administrative Science Quarterly 50, no. 3 (2005): 329–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Garud, Raghu and Rappa, Michael A., “A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants,” Organization Science 5, no. 3 (1994): 344–62Google Scholar.

65 R. Daniel Wadhwani and Geoffrey Jones, “Historical Change and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Explicating The ‘Dynamics’ in the Dynamic Capabilities Framework” in The Oxford Handbook of Dynamic Capabilities, ed. David Teece and Sohvi Leih (Oxford, forthcoming); Danneels, Erwin, “Trying to Become a Different Type of Company: Dynamic Capability at Smith Corona,” Strategic Management Journal 32, no. 1 (2011): 1–31 Google Scholar; Kahl, Steven J., “Associations, Jurisdictional Battles, and the Development of Dual-Purpose Capabilities,” Academy of Management Perspectives 28, no. 4 (2014): 381–94Google Scholar.

66 Mutch, Alistair, “Bringing History into the Study of Routines: Contextualizing Performance,” Organization Studies 37, no. 8 (2016): 1171–88Google Scholar.

67 Raff, Daniel M. G. and Scranton, Philip, eds., The Emergence of Routines (New York, 2016)Google Scholar.

68 Wadhwani et al., “Academic Entrepreneurship.”

69 Suchman, Mark C., “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3 (1995): 575 Google Scholar.

70 Suddaby, Roy and Greenwood, Royston, “Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy,” Administrative Science Quarterly 50, no. 1 (2005): 35–67 Google Scholar; Suddaby, Roy, Foster, William M., and Trank, Chris Quinn, “Rhetorical History as a Source of Competitive Advantage,” Advances in Strategic Management 27 (2010): 147–73Google Scholar; Maguire, Steve and Hardy, Cynthia, “Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: The Decline of DDT,” Academy of Management Journal 52, no. 1 (2009): 148–78Google Scholar

71 Hargadon, Andrew B. and Douglas, Yellowlees, “When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light,” Administrative Science Quarterly 46, no. 3 (2001): 476–501 Google Scholar.

72 Khaire and Wadhwani, “Changing Landscapes”; Greenwood, Royston, Hinings, C. R., and Suddaby, Roy, “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields,” Academy of Management Journal 45, no. 1 (2002): 58–80 Google Scholar.

73 Haack, Patrick, Pfarrer, Michael D., and Scherer, Andreas Georg, “Legitimacy-as-Feeling: How Affect Leads to Vertical Legitimacy Spillovers in Transnational Governance,” Journal of Management Studies 51, no. 4 (2014): 634–66Google Scholar.

74 Maguire and Hardy, “Discourse and Deinstitutionalization,” 148–78; Hiatt, Shon R., Sine, Wesley D., and Tolbert, Pamela S., “From Pabst to Pepsi: The Deinstitutionalization of Social Practices and the Creation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities,” Administrative Science Quarterly 54, no. 4 (2009): 635–67Google Scholar; Bucheli, Marcelo and Salvaj, Erica, “Reputation and Political Legitimacy: ITT in Chile, 1927–1972,” Business History Review 87, no. 4 (2013): 729–56Google Scholar.

75 Suddaby, Roy, Bitektine, Alex, and Haack, Patrick, “Legitimacy,” Academy of Management Annals 11, no. 1 (2017): 451–78Google Scholar.

76 Greenwood, Hinings, and Suddaby, “Theorizing Change”; Maguire and Hardy, “Discourse and Deinstitutionalization,” 148–78.

77 Bitektine, Alex and Haack, Patrick, “The ‘Macro' and the ‘Micro’ of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process,” Academy of Management Review 40, no. 1 (2015): 49–75 Google Scholar.

78 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977)Google Scholar; Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass., 1990)Google Scholar.

79 North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge, U.K., and New York, 1990)Google Scholar.

80 Baumol, “Entrepreneurship.”

81 Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Raff, Daniel M. G., eds., Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise (Chicago, 1995)Google Scholar; Guinnane, Timothy W., “Delegated Monitors, Large and Small: Germany's Banking System, 1800–1914,” Journal of Economic Literature 40, no. 1 (2002): 73–124 Google Scholar.

82 Schumpeter, “Creative Response,” 149.

83 Suddaby, Foster, and Quinn Trank, “Rhetorical History”; Raff, “How to Do Things with Time.”

84 Popp and Holt, “Presence.”

85 David Kirsch, Mahka Moeen, and R. Daniel Wadhwani, “Historicism and Industry Emergence: Industry Knowledge from Pre-Emergence to Stylized Fact” in Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, 217–40.