Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:08:24.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turning Art into Hammers: A Complex Biography of Palaeolithic Portable Art from Coímbre Cave (Asturias, Spain)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2022

Paula López-Calle ,
Álvaro Ibero ,
Marcos García-Diez Open the ORCID record for Marcos García-Diez [Opens in a new window] ,
Blanca Ochoa ,
María de Andrés-Herrero ,
David Álvarez-Alonso  and
José Yravedra
Paula López-Calle
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology Complutense University of Madrid c/ Profesor Aranguren s/n 28040 Madrid Spain E-mail: paulop11@ucm.es
Álvaro Ibero
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology Complutense University of Madrid c/ Profesor Aranguren s/n 28040 Madrid Spain E-mail: a.ibero@ucm.es
Marcos García-Diez
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology Complutense University of Madrid c/ Profesor Aranguren s/n 28040 Madrid Spain E-mail: marcos.garcia.diez@ucm.es
Blanca Ochoa
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Prehistory and Archaeology Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU) c/ Tomás y Valiente s/n 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz Spain E-mail: blanca.ochoafraile@gmail.com
María de Andrés-Herrero
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy I University of Alcalá c/ Colegios 2 28801 Alcalá de Henares Spain E-mail: maria.andresh@uah.es
David Álvarez-Alonso
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology Complutense University of Madrid c/ Profesor Aranguren s/n 28040 Madrid Spain E-mail: david.alvarez@ucm.es
José Yravedra
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology Complutense University of Madrid c/ Profesor Aranguren s/n 28040 Madrid Spain E-mail: jyravedr@ghis.ucm.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Palaeolithic representations can be approached from different perspectives. Studying the creative processes, we can glimpse the decisions that the Palaeolithic artists made and the actions they carried out to materialize an idea. Additionally, the combined study of both graphic and functional actions performed on an object provides a comprehensive approach and understanding of the evidence: in the first place, it allows us to hypothesize about the presence or absence of symbolic purpose of the representations; secondly, it makes the potential choice of eliminating such symbolism discernible for us. The monographic study of a Magdalenian pebble from Coímbre Cave (Asturias, Spain) engraved between 15,680 and 14,230 cal. bp shows that a mistake was made during the engraving process; subsequently an attempt was made to eliminate the representations, and finally the pebble was used as a hammerstone. This paper provides argumentation to reconstruct a complex biography of an object of Palaeolithic portable art, discussing intentional loss of symbolic value of both the decoration and the object and the latter's reuse (as raw material) for an economic or domestic purpose.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 431 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez-Alonso, D., 2017. La cueva de Coímbre (Asturias, España): localización e historia de su investigación. [Coímbre Cave (Asturias, Spain): location and history of research], in La cueva de Coímbre (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias): Ocupaciones humanas en el valle del Cares durante el Paleolítico superior [Coímbre Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias): Human occupation in the Cares Valley during the Upper Paleolithic], eds Álvarez-Alonso, D. & Yravedra, J.. Madrid: Fundación María Cristina Masaveu, 74–100.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Alonso, D. & Yravedra, J., 2017. La excavación arqueológica en la zona B de la cueva de Coímbre (Asturias, España): campañas 2008–2012 [Archaeological excavation of Zone B at Coímbre Cave (Asturias, Spain): 2008–2012 campaigns], in La cueva de Coímbre (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias): Ocupaciones humanas en el valle del Cares durante el Paleolítico superior [Coímbre Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias): Human occupation in the Cares Valley during the Upper Paleolithic], eds Álvarez-Alonso, D. & Yravedra, J.. Madrid: Fundación María Cristina Masaveu, 130–55.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Alonso, D., Yravedra, J., Arrizabalaga, A., Jordá Pardo, J.F. & Heredia, N., 2009. La cueva de Coímbre (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, España): su yacimiento arqueológico y su santuario rupestre. Un estado de la cuestión en 2008 [Coímbre Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain): the archaeological site and its rock-art sanctuary. State of the question in 2008]. Munibe 60, 139–55.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Alonso, D., Yravedra, J., Arrizabalaga, A. & Jordá, J.F., 2013. Excavaciones arqueológicas en la cueva de Coímbre (Besnes, Peñamellera Alta). Campañas 2008–2012 [Archaeological excavations at Coímbre Cave (Besnes, Peñamellera Alta). 2008–2012 campaigns], in Excavaciones Arqueológicas en Asturias 2007–2012 [Archaeological excavations in Asturias 2007–2012], ed. León Gasalla, P.. Gijón: Consejería de Cultura, Principado de Asturias, 109–20.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Alonso, D., Yravedra, J., Jordá, J.F. & Arrizabalaga, A., 2016. The Magdalenian sequence at Coímbre cave (Asturias, northern Iberian Peninsula): adaptative strategies of hunter-gatherer groups in montane environments. Quaternary International 402, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Alonso, D., Yravedra, J., Álvarez-Fernández, E., et al. , 2017. Subsistencia, movilidad y adaptación al medio de los cazadores-recolectores gravetienses en el norte de la Península Ibérica: La cueva de Coímbre (Asturias, Región Cantábrica) [Subsistence, mobility and environmental adaptation of the Gravettian hunter-gatherers in the northern Iberian Peninsula: Coímbre Cave (Asturias, Cantabric region)]. Trabajos de Prehistoria 74(1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Alonso, D., Yravedra, J., De Andrés Herrero, M., et al. , 2020. El Magdaleniense de la cueva de Coímbre, zona B (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, España) [The Magdalenian of Coímbre Cave, Zone B (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain)], in Magdalenian Chrono-stratigraphic Correlations and Cultural Connections between Cantabrian Spain and Southwestern France and Beyond, eds Straus, L.G. & Langlais, M.. Paris: Societé préhistorique française, 153–77.Google Scholar
Aulanier, M., Man-Estier, E., Lafarge, A., Delvigne, V., Liabeuf, R. & Raynal, J.P., 2016. Du galet à la paroi: données nouvelles sur l'art paléolithique de Haute-Loire (Massif Central, France) [From pebble to wall: new data for Palaeolithgic art in Haute-Loire], in L'Art du quotidien: objets ornés du Paleolithique superieur [Everyday art: decorated objects from the Upper Palaeolithic]. Actes du colloque international, Les-Eyzies-de-Tayac, 16–20 juin 2014, eds J.-J. Cleyet-Merle, J.-M. Geneste & E. Man-Estier. Paléo (numéro spécial), 505–34.Google Scholar
Aurière, L., 2009. Approche technologique de l'art mobilier paléolithique en matières osseuses: premières recherches sur la phase de préparation [A technological approach to Palaeolithic portable art in bone: first studies of the preparation phase]. Préhistoire, Art et Sociétés 64, 7–15.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 1972. Arte mueble del Paleolítico cantábrico [Portable art of the Cantabrian Paleolithic]. (Monografías Arqueológicas 14.) Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 1984. Utilización del espacio y proceso gráfico en el arte mueble paleolítico [The use of space and the graphic process of Palaeolithic portable art]. Scripta Praehistorica Francisco Jordá Oblata, 113–61.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 1988. Constantes y variabilidad del arte portátil magdaleniense en la vertiente cantábrica [Patterns and variability of Magdalenian portable art in the Cantabrian slope]. Veleia 5, 45–60.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 1994. Arte mueble del Paleolítico cantábrico: una visión de síntesis en 1994 [Cantabrian Palaeolithic portable art: a synthetic view in 1994]. Complutum 5, 45–80.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 2006. Imágenes y adornos en el arte portátil paleolítico [Images and ornaments in Paleolithic portable art]. Barcelona: Akal.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 2015. Contextualización arqueológica de Covaciella: una koiné pirenaico/cantábrica en el Magdaleniense medio [Archaeological context of Covaciella: a Pyreneean/Cantabrian koiné in the Middle Magdalenian], in Arte Rupestre Paleolítico En La Cueva de La Covaciella (Inguanzo, Asturias) [Palaeolithic rock art in Covaciella cave (Inguanzo, Asturias)], eds García-Diez, M., Ochoa, B. & Rodriguez-Asensio, J.A.. Oviedo: Principado de Asturias, Servicio de Publicaciones, 125–44.Google Scholar
Bégouën, R. & Clottes, J., 2008. Douze nouvelles plaquettes graveés d'Enlène [Twelve new engraved platelets from Enlène]. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie I, Prehistoria y Arqueología 1, 77–92.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1952. Quatre cents siècles d´art pariétal [Four hundred years of parietal art]. Paris: Max Fourny.Google Scholar
Capitan, L. & Peyrony, D., 1928. La Madeleine, son gisement, son industrie, ses œuvres d'art [La Madeleine, its deposits, industry and works of art]. Paris: L'Institut International d'Anthropologie.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, E. & Breuil, H., 1907. Les oeuvres d'art de la collection de Vibraye au Muséum National [Works of art from the Vibraye collection in the Muséum National]. L'Anthropologie 18(1–2), 1–36.Google Scholar
Casado, M.P., 1977. Los signos en el arte Paleolítico de la Península Ibérica [Signs in the Palaeolithic art of the Iberian Peninsula]. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Castañeda, N., 2018. Apprenticeship in early Neolithic societies: the transmission of technological knowledge at the flint mine of Casa Montero (Madrid, Spain), ca. 5300–5200 cal BC. Current Anthropology 59, 716–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkey, M.W. 1996. A history of the interpretation of European ‘Palaeolithic art’: magic, mythogram, and metaphors for modernity, in Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, eds Lock, A. & Peters, C.R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 288–349.Google Scholar
Corchón, M.S., 1986. El Arte Mueble paleolítico cantábrico: contexto y análisis interno [Cantabrian Palaeolithic portable art: context and inner analysis]. (Serie Monografías 16.) Santander: Centro de Investigación y Museo de Altamira.Google Scholar
Corchón, M.S., 2008. Reflexiones sobre la expresión artística y las relaciones culturales en el Magdaleniense Medio Cantábrico. A propósito de dos plaquitas grabadas inéditas de Las Caldas (Asturias, España) [Reflections on artistic expression and cultural relationships of the Cantabrian Middle Magdalenian. Regarding two unpublished engraved plaquettes in Las Caldas (Asturias, Spain)]. Veleia 24–25, 175–207.Google Scholar
Corchón, M.S. & Rivero, O., 2017. Catálogo de Arte Mueble en la Cueva de Las Caldas (Priorio, Oviedo): ocupaciones magdalenienses en el Valle del Nalón [Portable art catalogue for Las Caldas cave (Priorio, Oviedo): Magdalenian occupations in the Nalón Valley]. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Corchón, M.S., Rivero, O. & Martínez, J., 2006. Materiales líticos no tallados del Magdaleniense Medio de la Cueva de Las Caldas (Asturias, España). Estudio tecnológico de las cadenas operativas artísticas y económicas [Non-knapped lithic materials of the Middle Magdalenian in Las Caldas cave (Asturias, Spain)]. Sautuola 12, 59–74.Google Scholar
Crémades, M., 1994. L'Art mobilier paléolithique: analyse des procédés technologiques [Palaeolithic portable art: analysis of technological processes]. Complutum 5, 369–84.Google Scholar
Croidieu, E., 2012. Des fragments de mémoire. Les statuettes animalières de la grotte d'Isturitz (Pyrénées-Atlantiques) vers un approche technologique. [Fragments of memory. The animal statuettes from Isturitz cave (Atlantic Pyrenees) from a technological approach]. Master's thesis, Université Jean Moulin, Lyon.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1994. L'Art gravé azilien. De la technique à la signification [Azilian engraved art. From technique to meaning]. (Gallia Préhistoire supplement 31.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F. & Villa, P., 1998. Nouvelle analyse des os gravés et perforés du Paléolithique inférieur et moyen. Implications pour l'origine de la pensée symbolique [New analysis of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic engraved and perforated bones. Implications for the origin of symbolic thought]. Paléo, Revue d'Archéologie Préhistorique 10, 265–85.Google Scholar
de Beaume, S.A., 1997. Les galets utilisés au Paléolithique supérieur. Approche archéologique et experimentale [Pebbles used in the Upper Palaeolithic: an archaeological experimental approach]. (Gallia Préhistoire supplement 32.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Delporte, H. & Mons, L., 1977. Principes d'une étude sur les supports osseux de l'art paléolithique mobilier [Principles of a study of bone used in Palaeolithic portable art], in Méthodologie appliquée à l'industrie de l'os préhistorique [Methodology applied to prehistoric bone working]. Paris: CNRS, 69–76.Google Scholar
Enquist, M. & Arak, A., 1994. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372, 169–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fano, M.A., Rivero, O. & Garate, D., 2010. Plaqueta decorada de la Cueva de El Horno (Ramales de la Victoria, Cantabria) en su contexto local y regional [A decorated plaquette from El Horno cave (Ramales de la Victoria, Cantabria) in its local and regional context]. Munibe 61, 71–88.Google Scholar
Farbstein, R., 2011. The significance of social gestures and technologies of embellishment in Paleolithic portable art. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 18(2), 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, C., 1999. La gravure dans l'art mobilier magdalénien, du geste à la représentation [Engraving in Magdalenian portable art, from gesture to significance]. Paris: La Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Fritz, C., Tosello, G. & Conkey, M.W., 2016. Reflections on the identities and roles of the artists in European Paleolithic societies. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23, 1307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Diez, M. & Vaquero, M., 2006. La variabilité graphique du Molí del Salt (Vimbodí, Catalogne, Espagne) et l'art mobilier de la fin du paléolithique supérieur à l'est de la Péninsule Ibérique [Graphic variability at Molí del Salt (Vimbodí, Catalonia, Spain) and portable art at the end of the Upper Palaeolithic in the eastern Iberian peninsula]. L'Anthropologie 110, 453–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giedion, S., 1964. The Eternal Present: The beginnings of art and The beginnings of architecture. 2 vols. (A.W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts 1957, Bollingen Series 35.6, I and II.) New York (NY): Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D., 2011. The first appearance of symmetry in the Human lineage: where perception meets art. Symmetry 3, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idarraga, R. & Berganza, E., 2008. Dos cantos decorados del Magdaleniense Final de la Cueva de Urtiaga (Gipuzkoa) [Two decorated pebbles of the Upper-Magdalenian of Urtiaga cave (Gipuzkoa)]. Munibe 59, 101–18.Google Scholar
Janik, L. & Williams, J.C., 2018. Community art: communities of practice, situated learning, adults and children as creators of cave art in Upper Palaeolithic France and northern Spain. Open Archaeology 4(1), 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppers, W., 1950. The sketchbook of an Aurignacian artist. Man 50(132–133), 85–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laming-Emperaire, A., 1962. La signification de l'art rupestre paléolithique [The meaning of Palaeolithic rock art]. Paris : Éditions Picard.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., Delluc, B. & Delluc, G., 1995. Préhistoire de l´art occidental [The prehistory of western art]. Paris : Mazenod.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, D., 2002. The Mind in the Cave. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 1981. Les dessins noirs du Pech-Merle [The black drawings at Pech-Merle], in Compte rendu de la XXIe session du Congrès préhistorique de France, Quercy (3–9 septembre 1979, Montauban-Cahors-Figeac). Paris: Société préhistorique française, 178–207.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 1995. Les grottes ornées de la préhistoire. Nouveaux regards [Prehistoric decorated caves. A fresh view]. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Martínez-Villa, A., 2017. Revisión del conjunto de arte paleolítico de la Cueva de L'Tebellín en el macizo de La Llera (Posada de Llanes, Asturias, España). Una reflexión sobre concepto y cronología de los ideomorfos tipo claviforme [Reviewing the Palaeolithic art ensemble at Cueva de L'Tebellín in La Llera rock mass (Posada de Llanes, Asturias, Spain). A reflection on the concept and chronology of claviforms.] Cuadernos de Arte Prehistórico 4, 78–114.Google Scholar
Mellet, E., Salagnon, M., Majkić, A., et al. , 2019. Neuroimaging supports the representational nature of the earliest human engravings. Royal Society Open Science 6(7), 190086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mons, L., 1986. Les statuettes animalières en grès de la grotte d'Isturitz (Pyrénées-Atlantiques): observations et hypothèses de fragmentation volontaire [Sandstone animal statuettes in the Isturitz cave (Pyrénées-Atlantiques): observations and theories regarding deliberate destruction]. L'Anthropologie 90(4), 701–12.Google Scholar
Moro, O., 2013. Rock art stories: standard narratives and their alternatives. Rock Art Research 30(2), 139–73.Google Scholar
Moro, O. & González Morales, M.R., 2008. Paleolithic art studies at the beginning of the twenty-first century: a loss of innocence. Journal of Anthropological Research 64(4), 529–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moure, J.A. & Gil, G., 1972. Noticia preliminar sobre los nuevos yacimientos de arte rupestre descubiertos en Peñamellera Alta (Asturias) [Preliminary notice about the newly discovered rock art sites at Peñamellera Alta (Asturias)]. Trabajos de Prehistoria 29, 245–54.Google Scholar
Moure, J.A. & Gil, G., 1974. La cueva de Coímbre, en Peñamellera alta (Asturias) [Coímbre cave, in Peñamellera alta (Asturias)]. Boletín del Instituto de Estudios Asturianos 82, 505–28.Google Scholar
Muzquiz, M., 1988. Análisis artístico de las pinturas rupestres del gran techo de la cueva de Altamira: materiales y técnicas: comparación con otras muestras de arte rupestre [Artistic analysis of the rock art paintings on the ceiling of Altamira cave: materials and techniques: comparison with other rock art samples]. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Ochoa, B. & García-Diez, M., 2015. Chronology of western Pyrenean Paleolithic cave art: a critical examination. Quaternary International 364, 272–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, M., 2004. À propos du gisement magdalénien de Étiolles (Essonne): reflexion sur la fonction d'un site paléolithique [The Magdalenian deposit at Étiolles (Essonne): reflection on the function of a Palaeolithic site]. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 101(4), 797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paillet, P. & Man-Estier, E., 2010. Les oeuvres d'art de l'abri magdalénien de la Colombière (Neuville-sur-Ain, Ain). Nouvelle étude d'une collection majeure de l'art mobilier paléolithique [The artworks in the Magdalenian shelter of la Colombière (Neuville-sur-Ain, Ain). A new study of a major collection of Palaeolithic portable art]. Bulletin Préhistoire du Sud-Ouest 18, 35–104.Google Scholar
Pericot, L., 1942. La cueva del Parpalló (Gandía). Madrid.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P. & Pike, A., 2007. Dating European Paleolithic cave art: progress, prospects, problems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigeot, N., 1988. Apprendre à débiter des lames: un cas d’éducation technique chez les Magdalèniens d'Etiolles [Learning to make blades: a case of technical education among the Magdalenians of Étiolles]. Téchnologie préhistorique; notes et monographies 25, 27–36.Google Scholar
Ramil Soneira, J. & Vázquez Varela, J.M., 1983. Primer hallazgo de arte mueble paleolítico en Galicia [The first Palaeolithic portable art find in Galicia]. Ars Praehistórica 2, 191–3.Google Scholar
Rivero, O., 2007. Aproximación al estudio de las cadenas operativas del grabado sobre soporte pétreo: análisis tecnológico de una representación de équido del Magdaleniense Medio de la Cueva de Las Caldas (Asturias, España) [An approach to the study of engraving operative chains on lithic surfaces: technological analysis of an equid representation from the Middle Magdalenian at Las Caldas cave (Asturias, Spain)]. Zephyrus 60, 99–113.Google Scholar
Rivero, O., 2010. La movilidad de los grupos humanos del Magdaleniense en la Región Cantábrica y los Pirineos: una visión a través del arte [The mobility of Magdalenian human groups in the Cantabrian region and Pyrenees: a view through the art]. Doctoral thesis, Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Rivero, O., 2011. La noción de aprendizaje en el arte mobiliar del Magdaleniense medio cántabro-pirenaico: la contribución del análisis microscópico [The concept of learning in Magdalenian portable art: the contribution of microscopic analysis]. Trabajos de Prehistoria 68(2), 275–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, O., 2012. Una nueva mirada al arte mobiliar del Magdaleniense Medio de la Región Cantábrica y los Pirineos: la contribución del análisis de cadenas operativas [A new look into Middle-Magdalenian portable of the Cantabrian region and the Pyrenees: the contribution of analysing operative chains], in L'art pléistocène dans le monde [Pleistocene art of the world], ed. Clottes, J.. Tarascon-sur-Ariège: Société préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées, CD1411–CD1426.Google Scholar
Rivero, O, 2016. Master and apprentice: evidence for learning in Palaeolithic portable art. Journal of Archaeological Science 75, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, O & Garate, D., 2014. L'art mobilier gravettien sur support lithique de la grotte d'Isturitz (Saint-Martin-d'Arberoue, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France): une collection redécouverte [Gravettian portable art on stone from the Isturitz cave (Saint-Martin-d'Arberoue, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France): a collection rediscovered]. Paléo 25, 247–76.Google Scholar
Rivero, O & Garate, D., 2020. Motion and gesture: analysing artistic skills in Palaeolithic art. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 27, 561–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Mathurin, S. de, 1973. Bas-relief et plaquette de l'homme magdalénien d'Angles-sur-l'Anglin [Low relief and plaquette of the Magdalenian man of Angles-sur-l'Anglin]. Antiquités nationales 5, 12–19.Google Scholar
Sauvet, G., Sauvet, S. & Wlodarczyk, A., 1977. Essai de sémiologie préhistorique (pour une théorie des premiers signes graphiques de l'homme) [Prehistoric semiology (towards a theory of man's earliest graphic marks)]. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 74(2), 545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W., 2015. Neuronal reward and decision signals: from theories to data. Physiological Reviews 95, 853–951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sieveking, A., 1987. Engraved Magdalenian Plaquettes: A regional and stylistic analysis of stone, bone and antler plaquettes from Upper Palaeolithic sites in France and Cantabric Spain. (BAR International series S369.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Tosello, G., 2003. Pierres gravées du Périgord magdalénien: art, symboles, territoires [Engraved stones from Magdalenian Périgord: art, symbols, territories]. (Gallia Préhistoire supplement 36.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Turcios, J., 1995. Maestros subterráneos [Underground masters]. Madrid: Celeste.Google Scholar
Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Rojo, S., et al. , 2020. The evolution of early symbolic behavior in Homo sapiens. PNAS 117, 4578–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vialou, D. 1986. L'art des grottes en Ariège Magdalénienne [Cave art in Magdalenian Ariège]. (Gallia Préhistoire supplement 23.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Villaverde, V., 1994. Arte paleolítico de la Cova del Parpalló. Estudio de la colección de plaquetas y cantos con grabados y pinturas [Palaeolithic art of Parpalló cave. Study of the collection of engraved and painted plaquettes and pebbles ]. Valencia: Diputación Provincial de Valencia.Google Scholar
White, M. & Foulds, F., 2018. Symmetry is its own reward: on the character and significance of Acheulean handaxe symmetry in the Middle Pleistocene. Antiquity 92, 304–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar