Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:30:34.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology and Society during the Middle Pleistocene: Hominid Group Size, Social Learning and Industrial Variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Steven Mithen
Steven Mithen
Affiliation:
Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of Reading Whiteknights, PO Box 218Reading RG6 2AA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A model is developed for the relationship between the tool behaviour and social behaviour of Homo erectus. This explores the role of social learning as the link between social organization and techniques — the methods used to manufacture stone tools. Predictions are made as to how techniques should vary with increasing group size and these are evaluated through a case study from the Middle Pleistocene of southeast England. The case study suggests that inter-assemblage variability in the Lower Palaeolithic can partly be attributed to different relative intensities of individual and social learning arising from varying hominid group size and social interaction in open and closed (i.e. wooded) environments. As such, the paper seeks to integrate material from three fields — comparative socioecology, primate social learning and Palaeolithic archaeology — to explore the relationship between society and technology.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 3 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arsuaga, J-L., Martinez, I., Gracia, A., Carretero, J-M. & Carbonell, E., 1993. Three new human skulls from the Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site in Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain. Nature 363, 534–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, N.M., 1992. The High Lodge flint industries, in High Lodge: Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking 1962–68 & J. Cook 1988, eds. Ashton, N.M., Cook, J., Lewis, S.G. & Rose, J.. London: British Museum Press, 124–63.Google Scholar
Ashton, N.M. & McNabb, J., 1992. The interpretation and context of the High Lodge flint industries, in High Lodge: Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking 1962–68 & J. Cook 1988, eds. Ashton, N.M., Cook, J., Lewis, S.G. & Rose, J.. London: British Museum Press, 164–8.Google Scholar
Ashton, N.M., Cook, J., Lewis, S.G. & Rose, J. (eds.), 1992. High Lodge: Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking 1962–68 & J. Cook 1988. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Ashton, N.M., Lewis, S.G. & Rose, J., 1992. Summary, in High Lodge: Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking 1962–68 & j. Cook 1988, eds. Ashton, N.M., Cook, J., Lewis, S.G. & Rose, J.. London: British Museum Press, 169–79.Google Scholar
Ayers, W.S. & Rhee, S.N., 1984. The Acheulian in Asia? A review of ‘Research on Korean Palaeolithic culture’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 50, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A., 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, G. & Cabana, G., 1990. Group size and variability in primates. Primates 31, 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, B., 1974. Baboons, chimpanzees and tools. Journal of Human Evolution 3, 509–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarik, R., 1992. Palaeoart and archaeological myths. Cambridge Archaeological journal 2(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, C.A. & Roberts, M.B., 1988. Flaking technology at the Acheulian site of Boxgrove, West Sussex (England). Revue Archéologique de Picardie 1–2, 105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L., 1985. Human ancestors: changing views of their behaviour, journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4, 292–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L., 1989. Isolating the transitions to cultural adaptations, in Debating Archaeology, by L. Binford. New York (NY): Academic Press, 423–36.Google Scholar
Boesch, C., 1991. Teaching among chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 41, 530–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C., 1993. Aspects of transmission of tool-use in wild chimpanzees, in Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution, eds. Gibson, K. & Ingold, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–83.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H., 1983. Optimisation of nutcracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 83, 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H., 1990. Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica 54, 86–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, D.Q., Rose, J., McCabe, A.M. & Sutherland, D.G., 1986. Correlation of Quaternary glaciations in England, Ireland, Scotland & Wales, in Quaternary Glaciations in the Northern Hemisphere: Report of the International Geological Correlation Programme Project 24, ed s. Sibrava, V., Bowen, D.Q. & Richmond, G.M.. (Quaternary Science Reviews 5.) Oxford & New York (NY): Pergamon Press, 299–340.Google Scholar
Box, H.O., 1984. Primate Behaviour and Social Ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P., 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. & Sampson, C.G., 1978. Artefacts from the Cottages site, in Palaeoecology and Archaeology of an Acheulian Site at Caddington, England, ed. Sampson, C.G.. Dallas (TX): Southern Methodist University, 83–137.Google Scholar
Briggs, D.J., Coope, G.R. & Gilbertson, D.D., 1985. The Chronology and Environmental Framework of Early Man in the Upper Thames Valley. (BAR 137.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R.W. & Whiten, A., 1988. Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R.W. & Whiten, A., 1992. Cognitive evolution in primates: evidence from tactical deception. Man 27, 609‐27.Google Scholar
Cambefort, V.P., 1981. A comparative study of culturally transmitted patterns of feeding habits in the chacma baboon Papio ursinus and the vervet monkey Cercopithecus aethiops. Folio Primatalogica 36, 243–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, C.P., 1934. A field study of the behaviour and social relations of howling monkeys. Comparative Psychology Monographs 10(2), 1–168.Google Scholar
Catt, J., Hubbard, R.N.L. & Sampson, C.G., 1978. Summary and conclusions, in Palaeoecology and Archaeology of an Acheulian Siteat Caddington, England, ed. Sampson, C.G.. Dallas (TX): Southern Methodist University, 138–49.Google Scholar
Chapman, C, 1990. Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates. Folia Primatologica 55, 1‐9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P., 1991. Symbols and Palaeolithic artefacts: style, standardization and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 193‐214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P. & Dibble, H., 1987. Middle Palaeolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6, 263–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P. & Dibble, H., 1992. Scientific archaeology and the origins of symbolism: a reply to Bednarik. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D.L. & Wrangham, R.W., 1987. Predation, in Primate Societies, eds. Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Wrangham, R.W. & Struhsaker, T.T.. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press, 227–39.Google Scholar
Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Smuts, B.B. & Wrangham, R.W., 1987. The future of primate research, in Primate Societies, eds. Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Wrangham, R.W. & Struhsaker, T.T.. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 491–6.Google Scholar
Clayton, D., 1978. Socially facilitated behaviour. Quarterly Review of Biology 53, 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Harvey, P.H., 1977. Primate ecology and social organisation. Journal of the Zoological Society of London 183,1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D., 1969. Culture traditions and environment of early man. Current Anthropology 10, 267–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. & McGrew, W.C., 1987. Termite fauna related to differences in tool use between groups of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Primates 28, 457–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. & Ashton, N., 1991. High Lodge, Mildenhall. Current Archaeology 123, 133–8.Google Scholar
Corballis, M., 1989. Laterality and human evolution. Psychological Review 96, 492–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corballis, M., 1992. The Lopsided Ape: Evolution of the Generative Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coxon, P., Hall, A.P., Lister, A. & Stuart, A.J., 1980. New evidence on the vertebrate fauna, stratigraphy and palaeobotany of the interglacial deposits at Swanton Morley, Norfolk. Geographical Magazine 117, 525–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranshaw, S., 1983. Handaxes and Cleavers: Selected English Acheulian Industries. (BAR 113.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currant, A.P., 1986. Man and the Quaternary interglacial faunas of Britain, in The Palaeolithic of Britain and its Nearest Neighbours, ed. Collcut, S.N.. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology & Prehistory, 50–52.Google Scholar
Darby, C. & Riopelle, A., 1959. Observational learning in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52, 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., 1991. The archaeology of language origins — a review. Antiquity 65, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., 1992. There’s no art — to find the mind’s construction — in offence. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2(1), 52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I. & Noble, W., 1989. The archaeology of perception: traces of depiction and language. Current Anthropology 30, 125–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R., 1983. European Economic Prehistory. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dibble, H., 1987. The interpretation of Middle Palaeolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52, 109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H., 1988. The implications of tool types for the presence of language during the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic, in The Human Revolution, eds. Mellars, P. & Stringer, C.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 415–32.Google Scholar
Donald, M., 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M., 1988. Primate Social Systems. London: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M., 1991. Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatologica 57, 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M., 1992. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution 20, 469–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, R.D., 1974. Social organisation of the African Bovidae, in The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, eds. Geist, V. & Walthen, I.. Monges: IUCN, 166–205.Google Scholar
Falk, D., 1980. Language, handedness and primate brains: did the Australopithecines sign? American Anthropologist 82, 72–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. A. & Lee, P.C., 1989. Finitesocial space, evolutionary pathways, and reconstructing hominid social behaviour. Science 243, 9016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. & Visalberghi, E., 1990. Social processes affecting the appearance of innovative behaviours in Capuchin monkeys. Folia Primatologica 54, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galef, B.G., 1976. Social transmission of acquired behaviour: a discussion of tradition and social learning in vertebrates, in Advances in the Study of Behaviour 6, eds. Rosenblatt, J.S., Hinde, R.A., Shaw, E. & Beer, C.G.. New York (NY): Academic Press, 77–100.Google Scholar
Galef, B.G., 1988. Imitation in animals: history, definition and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory, in Social Learning: A Comparative Approach, eds. Zentall, T.R. & Galef, B.G.. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Galef, B.G., 1990. Tradition in animals: field observations and laboratory analysis, in Methods, Inferences, Interpretations and Explanations in the Study of Behavior, eds. Bekoff, M. & Jamieson, D.. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, C., 1984. Regional variation in hunter-gatherer strategy in the Upper Pleistocene of Europe, in Hominid Evolution and Community Ecology, ed. Foley, R.. London: Academic Press, 237–60.Google Scholar
Gamble, C., 1986. The Palaeolithic Settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, C., 1987. Man the shoveler: alternative models for Middle Pleistocene colonization and occupation in northern latitudes, in The Pleistocene Old World, ed. Soffer, O.. New York (NY): Plenum Press, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, C., 1992. Comment on ‘Dense forests, cold steppes, and the Palaeolithic settlement of Northern Europe’ by W. Roebroeks, N.J.Conrad & T. van Kolfschoten. Current Anthropology 33, 551–86.Google Scholar
Geist, V., 1974. On the relationship between social evolution and ecology in ungulates. American Zoobgist 14, 205‐20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, P.L. & Stuart, A.J., 1975. Flora and vertebrate fauna of the Barrington Beds. Geological Magazine 112, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, K., 1991. Tools, language and intelligence: evolutionary implications. Man 26, 255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, K. & Ingold, T. (eds.), 1993. Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, J., 1973. Cultural elements in the chimpanzee community, in Precultural Primate Behaviour, ed. Menzel, E.W.. Basel: Karger, 144–84.Google Scholar
Gowlett, J., 1984. The mental abilities of early man: a look at some hard evidence, in Human Evolution and Community Ecology, ed. Foley, R.. London: Academic Press, 167–92.Google Scholar
Hall, K.R.L., 1963. Observation learning in monkeys and apes. British journal of Psychology 54, 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, A. & McGrew, W.C., 1987. Chimpanzees using stones to crack open palm oil nuts in Liberia. Primates 28, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., 1988. Invention and social transmission: new data from wild vervet monkeys, in Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Experience and the Evolution of Intelligence in Monkeys, Apes and Humans, eds. Bryne, R. & Whiten, A.. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, 327–413.Google Scholar
Hayes, K.J. & Hayes, C., 1952. Imitation in a home-raised chimpanzee, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 45, 450–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, D., 1992. The effect of wolf predation and snow cover on musk-ox group size. The American Naturalist 139, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmann, G., 1988. A case of simple tool use in wild liontailed macaques. Primates 29, 565–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, R.L., 1969. Culture, a human domain. Current Anthropology 10, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, R.L., 1981. Human brain evolution: a search for units, models and synthesis. Canadian Journal of Anthropology 3, 215–30.Google Scholar
Huffman, M.A., 1984. Stone play of Macaca fuscata in Arashiyama B troop: transmission of a non-adaptive behavior, journal of Human Evolution 13, 725–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, M. & Quiatt, D., 1986. Stone handling by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata): implications for tool use of stone. Primates 27, 413–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N., 1976. The social function of intellect, in Growing Points in Ethology, eds. Bateson, P.P.G. & Hinde, R.A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–17.Google Scholar
Hunt, C.O., 1992. Pollen and algal microfossils from the High Lodge clayey silts, in High Lodge: Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking 1962–68 & J. Cook 1988, eds. Ashton, N.M., Cook, J., Lewis, S.G. & Rose, J.. London: British Museum Press, 109–15.Google Scholar
Hutterer, K., 1977. Reinterpreting the southeast Asia Palaeolithic, in Sunda and Sahul: Prehistoric Studies in Southeast Asia, Melanesia and Australia, ed. Allen, s.J., Golson, J. & Jones, R.. London: Academic Press, 31–71.Google Scholar
Isaac, G.I., 1978. The food-sharing behaviour of proto-human hominids. Scientific American 238, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G.I., 1984. The archaeology of human origins: studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa. Advances in World Archaeology 3, 1–87.Google Scholar
Isbell, L.A., Cheney, D.L. & Seyfarth, R.M., 1991. Group fusions and minimum group sizes in Vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiopus). American Journal of Primatology 25, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman, P.J., 1974. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 715–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, A., 1966. Lemur social behaviour and primate intelligence. Science 153, 501–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, P., 1980. Experimental butchery with modern stone tools and its relevance for Palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeology 12, 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P., 1981. Experimental implement manufacture and use: a case study from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 292, 189–95.Google Scholar
Kappler, P., 1987. The acquisition process of a novel behaviour pattern in a group of ring tailed lemurs. Primates 28, 225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, J.H., 1974. The ecology and evolution of social organisation in the kangaroo family (Macropodiae). American Zoologist 14, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, S., 1959. The process of sub-culture propagation among Japanese macaques. Primates 24, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, L., 1980. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, L. & Toth, N., 1981. Microwear polishes on early stone tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Nature 203, 464–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, W.L. & Kellogg, N.A., 1933. The Ape and the Child. New York (NY): Whittlesey House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerney, M.P., 1971. Interglacial deposits in Barnfield pit, Swanscombe, and their molluscan fauna. Journal of the Geological Society of London 127, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B.J., 1991. Social information transfer in monkeys, apes, and hominids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 34, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitahara-Frisch, J., 1978. Stone tools as indicators of linguistic abilities in early man. Kagaku Kisoran Gakkai Annals 5, 101–9.Google Scholar
Kummer, H., 1971. Primates Societies. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. & Goodall, J., 1985. Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 308, 203–14.Google Scholar
Kummer, H., Banaja, A., Abo-khatwa, A. & Ghandour, A., 1985. Differences in social behaviour between Ethiopian and Arabian Hamadryas baboons. Folia Primatologica 45, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, L., 1953. Adam’s Ancestors. London: Metheun.Google Scholar
Lindly, J.M. & Clark, G.A., 1990. Symbolism and modern human origins. Current Anthropology 31, 233–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W.C., 1992. Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W.C. & Tutin, C.E.G., 1973. Chimpanzee tool use in dental grooming. Nature 241, 477–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W.C., Tutin, C.E.G. & Baldwin, P., 1979. Chimpanzees, tools, and termites: Cross-cultural comparisons of Senegal, Tanzania, and Rio Mini. Man 14, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N., 1988. Homo imitans, in Social Learning: A Comparative Approach, eds. Zentall, T.R. & Galef, B.G.. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum Press, 319–42.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G.F., Penny, L.F., Shotton, F.W. & West, R.G., 1973. A correlation of Quaternary deposits in the British Isles. Geological Society of London, Special Report No. 4, 1–99.Google Scholar
Mithen, S.J., 1994. From domain specific to generalised intelligence: a cognitive interpretation of the Middle/Upper Palaeolithic transition, in The Ancient Mind, eds. Renfrew, C. & Zubrow, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movius, H., 1948. The Lower Palaeolithic cultures of southern and eastern Asia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Association 38, 329–12.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M., 1970. Conjoined flakes from the Lower Loam, Barnfield pit, Swanscombe. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute for 1970, 51–9.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M., 1979. Comment on The Clactonian: an independent entity or an integral part of the Acheulian’ by M.Y. Ohel. Current Anthropology 20, 685–726.Google Scholar
Nishida, T., 1987. Local traditions and cultural transmission, in Primate Societies, eds. Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Wrangham, R.W. & Struhsaker, T.T.. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press, 462–74.Google Scholar
Nishida, T., Wrangham, R.W., Goodall, J. & Uehara, S., 1983. Local differences in plant feeding habits of chimpanzees between the Mahale Mountains and Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Journal of Human Evolution 12, 467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohel, M.Y., 1979. The Clactonian: an independent entity or an integral part of the Acheulian. Current Anthropology 20, 685–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., 1962. Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York (NY): Norton.Google Scholar
Pigeot, N., 1990. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists at Magdalenian Etiolles. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9, 126–41.Google Scholar
Pope, G., 1985. Taxonomy, dating and palaeoenvironments: the palaeoecology of early far eastern hominids. Modern Quaternary Research in South-East Asia 5, 65–80.Google Scholar
Pope, G., 1989. Bamboo and human evolution. Natural History 10, 49–56.Google Scholar
Rightmire, G.P. 1990. The Evolution of Homo erectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M., 1986. Excavations of the Lower Palaeolithic site at Amey’s Eartham pit, Boxgrove, West Sussex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 215–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, D., 1979. Comment on The Clactonian: an independent entity or an integral part of the Acheulian’ by M.Y. Ohel. Current Anthropology 20, 685–726.Google Scholar
Roe, D., 1981. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., 1988. From flint scatters to early hominid behaviour: a study of Middle Palaeolithic riverside settlements at Maastricht-Belvedere. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 21, 1–196.Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., Conrad, N.J. & van Kolfschoten, T., 1992. Dense forests, cold steppes, and the Palaeolithic settlement of Northern Europe. Current Anthropology 33, 551–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A.R., 1988. Does biology constrain culture? American Anthropologist 90, 818–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolland, N. & Dibble, H.L., 1990. A new synthesis of Middle Palaeolithic variability. American Antiquity 55, 480–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosdeth, L., Wrangham, R.W., Harrigan, A.M. & Smuts, B., 1991. The human community as a primate society. Current Anthropology 32, 221–54.Google Scholar
Sabater Pi, J., 1974. An elementary industry of the chimpanzees in the Okorobiko mountains, Rio Muri (Republic of Equatorial Guinea), West Africa. Primates 15, 351–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, J.R., 1982. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1, 59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Sevcik, R.A., Brakke, K.E., Rumbaugh, D.M. & Greenfield, P.M., 1990. Symbols: their communicative use, comprehension, and combination by bonobos (Pan paniscus), in Advances in Infancy Research, vol. 6, eds. Rovee-Collier, C. & Lipsitt, L.P.. Norwood (NJ): Ablex, 221–78.Google Scholar
Scheurer, J. & Thierry, B., 1985. A further food washing tradition in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Primates 26, 491–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, A., 1979. Olfactory communication in the promisians, in The Study of Promisian Behaviour, eds. Doyle, G. & Martin, R.. New York (NY): Academic Press, 461–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, K., 1980. Two hunting episodes of Middle Palaeolithic age at La Cotte de Saint-Brelade, Jersey (Channel Islands). World Archaeology 12, 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, S., 1991. Tradition, rationality and cultural transmission, in Processual and Post-processual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, ed. Preucel, R.. Carbondale (IL): Centre for Archaeological Investigation, University of South Illinois, 197–208.Google Scholar
Shotton, F.W., 1986. Glaciations in the United Kingdom. Quaternary Science Reviews 5, 293–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, D., 1991. Early hominid behaviour and culture tradition: raw material studies in Bed II, Olduvai Gorge. African Archaeological Review 9, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopp, M., 1988. A Taphonomic Analysis of the Hoxne Site Faunal Assemblages. Unpublished M.Phil dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stringer, C., 1993. Palaeoanthropology: secrets of the pit of the bones. Nature 362, 501–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringer, C. & Gamble, C., 1993. In Search of the Neanderthals. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Stringer, C., Howell, F.C. & Melentis, J.K., 1979. The significance of the fossil hominid skull from Petralona, Greece. Journal of Archaeological Science 6(3), 235–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, A.J., 1982. Pleistocene Vertebrates in the British Isles. New York (NY): Longman.Google Scholar
Svoboda, J., 1987. Lithic industries of the Arago, Vértesszöllös, and Bilzingsleben hominids: comparisons and evolutionary interpretation. Current Anthropology 28, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svobada, J., 1992. Comment on ‘Dense forests, cold steppes, and the Palaeolithic settlement of Northern Europe’ by W. Roebroeks, N.J. Conrad & T. van Kolfschoten. Current Anthropology 33, 551–86.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I., Delson, E. & van Couvering, J., 1988. Encyclopedia of Human Evolution and Prehistory. New York (NY): Garland Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., 1990. Cultural transmission in tool use and communicatory signalling of chimpanzees, in Language and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Developmental Perspectives, eds. Parker, S. & Gibson, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 274–311.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Davis-Dasilva, M., Camak, L. & Bard, K., 1987. Observational learning of tool use by young chimpanzees. Human Evolution 2, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, N., 1985. The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12, 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, N., Schick, K.D., Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Sevcik, R.A. & Rumbaugh, D.M., 1993. Pan the tool-maker: investigations into the stone tool-making and tool-using capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus). Journal of Archaeological Science 20, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A., 1992. Large carnivores and the earliest European hominids: changing determinants of resource availability during the Lower and Middle Pleistocene. Journal of Human Evolution 22, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, C., 1970. The Middle Pleistocene deposits at Marks Tey, Essex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 257, 373–440.Google Scholar
Tyldesley, J., 1986. The Wolvercote Channel Handaxe Assemblage: A Comparative Study. (BAR 152.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valoch, K., 1984. Le Taubachien, sa géochronologie, paléoécologie et sa paléoethnologie. L'Anthropologie 88, 193–208.Google Scholar
van Shaik, C.P., 1983. Why are diurnal primates living in large groups? Behaviour 87, 120–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vértes, L., 1975. The Lower Palaeolithic site of Vérteszöllös, Hungary, in Recent Archaeological Excavations in Europe, ed. Bruce-Mitford, R.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 287–301.Google Scholar
Villa, P., 1983. Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene Archaeological Record from Southern France. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Villa, P., 1990. Torralba and Aridos: elephant exploitation in Middle Pleistocene Spain. Journal of Human Evolution 19, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, P., 1991. Middle Pleistocene prehistory in southwestern Europe: the state of our knowledge and ignorance. Journal of Anthropological Research 47, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., 1987. Acquisition of nut cracking behaviour by two capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Folia Primatologica 49, 168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E. & Fragaszy, D., 1990. Do monkeys ape?, in Language and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Developmental Perspectives, eds. Parker, S. & Gibson, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–73.Google Scholar
Watanabe, H., 1985. The chopper-chopping tool complex of East Asia: an ethno-archaeological ecological re-examination. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenban-Smith, F.F., 1989. The use of canonical variates for determination of biface manufacturing techniques at Boxgrove Lower Palaeolithic site and the behavioural implications of this technology. Journal of Archaeological Science 16, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R.G., 1977. Pleistocene Geology & Biology. New York (NY): Longman.Google Scholar
White, F., 1992. Pygmy chimpanzee social organization: variation with party size and between study sites. American Journal of Primatology 26, 203–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., 1989. Transmission mechanisms in primate cultural evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 61–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteside, G., 1985. Nut cracking by wild chimpanzees in Sierra Leone, West Africa. Primates 26, 91–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, P., 1987. Infants and adult males, in Primate Societies, eds. Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Wrangham, R.W. & Struhsaker, T.T.. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press, 343–57.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R., 1987. Evolution of social structure, in Primate Societies, eds. Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Wrangham, R.W. & Struhsaker, T.T.. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press, 283–96.Google Scholar
Wymer, J., 1968. Lower Palaeolithic Archaeology in Britain as Represented by the Thames Valley. London: John Baker.Google Scholar
Wymer, J., 1974. Clactonian and Acheulian industries in Britain: their character and significance. Proceedings of the Geological Association 85, 391–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wymer, J., 1979. Comment on The Clactonian: an independent entity or an integral part of the Acheulian’ by M.Y. Ohel. Current Anthropology 20, 685–726.Google Scholar
Wymer, J., 1985. Palaeolithic Sites of East Anglia. Norwich: GeoBooks.Google Scholar
Wymer, J., 1988. Palaeolithic archaeology and the British Quaternary sequence. Quaternary Science Reviews 7, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1991. Tools, grammar and the archaeology of cognition. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(2), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T. & Tierson, F., 1990. Regional comparison of the shapes of later Acheulian handaxes. American Anthropologist 92, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagiwa, J., Yumoto, T., Ndunda, M. & Maruhashi, T., 1988. Evidence of tool use by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) for digging out a bee nest in the Kahuzi-Biega National park, Zaire. Primates 29, 405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yando, R., Seitz, V. & Zigler, E., 1978. Imitation: A Developmental Perspective. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Association.Google Scholar
Yi, S. & Clark, G.A., 1983. Observations on the Lower Palaeolithic of Northeast Asia. Current Anthropology 24, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar