Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:52:03.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Achilles' last stand: Institutionalising dissent in Homer's Iliad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Elton Barker
Elton Barker
Affiliation:
Wolfson College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Debate in the Iliad – what form it takes, what significance that might have, whether or not it even exists – has been a matter of some controversy. One approach has been to examine debate in terms of a formal social context and to extrapolate from this some kind of political or – according to other accounts – pre-political community that the Iliad preserves. Scholars have, however come up with very different ideas about how to describe that society, how to interpret that depiction, or whether such attempts are even fruitful. An alternative approach focuses on the form of the speeches and analyses them as the production of thesis and antithesis: in these terms the cut-and-thrust of debate is understood as a form of proto-rhetorical theory.

All this seems far removed from debate as it is represented in the narrative, which is the subject of this paper. I begin with four preliminary propositions. Previous approaches have tended to homogenise different scenes of debate, with little regard to differences in structure or context.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 50 , 2004 , pp. 92 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Alvis, J. (1995) Divine purpose and heroic response in Homer and Virgil, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Arend, W. (1933) Die typischen Szenen bei Homer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays, Austin.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. (1969) Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, Paris.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The logic of practice (French orig. 1980), Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, P. (1996) ‘Les basileis homériques sont-ils des rois?’, Ktèma 21, 5–22.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1995) ‘Agamemnon's stance’, Philologus 139, 72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, O. (1976) ‘Speech and silence in the Iliad’, CJ 71, 300–5.Google Scholar
Davidson, O. M. (1980) ‘Indo-European dimensions of Heracles in Iliad 19.133’, Arethusa 13, 197–202.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (1987) Narrators and focalisers: the presentation of the story in the Iliad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1996) The masters of truth in archaic Greece (French orig. 1967), New York.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1951) The Greeks and the irrational, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donlan, W. (1979) ‘The structure of authority in the Iliad’, Arethusa 12, 51–70.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. (1996) ‘Homer's sense of text’, JHS 116, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. (1989) ‘Agamemnon's skêptron in the Iliad’, in Mackenzie, M. M. & Roueché, C. (eds.) Images of authority: papers presented to Joyce Reynolds, Cambridge, 104–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. T. (1985) Achilles in the Odyssey: ideologies of heroism in the Homeric epic, Königstein.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1987) Homer: poet of the Iliad, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1991) The Iliad: a commentary. Vol. 5 (books 17–20), Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, J. D. (1971) ‘Agôn: studies in the use of a word’, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, J. D. (1974) ‘ΑΙ ΏΝ ΝΕΩΝ: an unrecognised metaphor in the Iliad’, CP 69, 258–64.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1986) Untersuchungen zur Funktion der Götter im homerischen Epos, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M. I. (2002) The world of Odysseus (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1954), London.Google Scholar
Fish, S. (1980) Is there a text in this class?, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1991) Immanent art: from structure to meaning in traditional oral epic, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1999) Homer's traditional art, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1992) Homer: the poetry of the past, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. (1955) Droit et société dans la Grèce ancienne, Paris.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. (1981) The anthropology of ancient Greece (French orig. 1968), Baltimore.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. (1982) Droit et institutions en Grèce antique, Paris.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society: an outline of the theory of structuration, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1999) review of Ruze (1997), CR 49, 151–2.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer: the early reception of epic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. & Haubold, J. (forthcoming) Homer: the resonance of epic, London.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1983) Homer on life and death (1 st publ. 1980), Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1986) ‘Words and speakers in Homer’, JHS 106, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. & Hammond, M. (1998) ‘Critical appreciation: Homer Iliad 1.1–52’, in McAuslan, I. & Walcot, P. (eds.) Homer, Greece and Rome Studies, Oxford, 65–82.Google Scholar
Haft, A. (1990) “The city-sacker Odysseus' in Iliad 2 & 10’, TAPA 120, 37–56.Google Scholar
Haft, A. (1992) ‘Prophecy and recollection in the assemblies of Iliad 2 and Odyssey 2’, Arethusa 25, 223–40.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the barbarian: Greek self-definition through tragedy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (1997a) ‘Achilles as vagabond: the culture of autonomy in the Iliad’, CW 90, 341–66.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (1997b) ‘“Who shall readily obey?” Authority and politics in the Iliad’, Phoenix 5l, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D. (1998) ‘Homer, tyranny, and democracy’, GRBS 39, 331–60.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (2002) The Iliad as politics: the performance of political thought, Norman.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2000) Homer's people: epic poetry and social formation, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiden, B. (1991) ‘Shifting contexts in the Iliad’, Eranos 89, 1–12.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1998) ‘Zwischen Agon und Argumentation. Rede und Redner in der archaischen Polis’, in Neumeister, C. & Raeck, W. (eds.) Rede und Redner: Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulteren, Möhnese, 17–43.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1978) The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response (German orig. 1976), London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (1992) The Iliad: a commentary. Vol. 4 (books 13–16), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1985) The Iliad: a commentary. Vol. 1 (books 1–4), Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, R. & Russo, J. (1989) ‘Agamemnon's test: Iliad 2.73–75’, CA 8, 351–8.Google Scholar
Kouklankis, A. (1999) ‘Thersites, Odysseus and the social order’, in Carlisle, M. & Levaniouk, O. (eds) Nine essays on Homer, Lanham, MD, 35–53.Google Scholar
Krischer, T. (1971) Formate Konventionen der homerischen Epik, Munich.Google Scholar
Leaf, W. (1960) Homer the Iliad, 2 vols. (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1886–8), Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. (1994) Authority: construction and corrosion, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, D. (1970) Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, E. R. (1991) Thersites: a study in comic shame, New York.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M. (1988) Epos: word, narrative and the Iliad, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1982) Homer, Iliad book 24, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McGlew, J. F. (1989) ‘Royal power and the Achaean assembly at Iliad 2.84–393’, CA 8, 283–95.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. (1996) Talking Trojan: speech and community in the Iliad, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1951) Recherches surl'agora grecque: études d'histoire et d'architecture urbaines, Paris.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (1989) The language of heroes: speech and performance in the Iliad, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2000) ‘Wrapping Homer up: cohesion, discourse and deviation in the Iliad’, in Sharrock, A. & Morales, H. (eds.), lntratextuality: Greek and Roman textual relations, Oxford, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1973) ‘Freedom of speech in antiquity’, in Wiener, P. P. (ed.), Dictionary of the history of idea?, New York, 252–63.Google Scholar
Mondi, R. (1980) ‘ΣΚΗΠΤΟϒΧΟΙ ΒΑΣΙ ΛΕΙΣ: an argument for divine kingship in early Greece’, Arethusa 13, 203–16.Google Scholar
Morris, I. (1986) ‘The use and abuse of Homer’, CA 5, 81–138.Google Scholar
Morris, I. (1996) ‘The strong principle of equality and the archaic origins of Greek democracy’, in Ober, J. & Hedrick, C. (eds.), Démokratia: a conversation on democracies, ancient and modern, Princeton, 19–48.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. (ed.) (1986) Bakhtin: essays and dialogues on his work, Chicago.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, JRS 33, 161–82.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The best of the Achaeans: concepts of the hero in archaic Greek poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1996) Homeric questions, Austin.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1997) ‘The shield of Achilles: ends of the Iliad and beginnings of the polis’, in Langdon, S. (ed.), New light on a dark age: exploring the culture of Geometric Greece, Columbia, 194–207.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1999) ‘Homer and Plato at the Panathenaia: synchronic and diachronic perspectives’, in Falkner, T. M, Felson, N. & Konstan, D. (eds.), Contextualizing classics: ideology, performance, dialogue, Lanham, MD, 123–50.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1996) Greece in the making: 1200–479 BC, London.Google Scholar
Owen, E. T. (1947) The story of the Iliad, London.Google Scholar
Page, D. (1959) History and the Homeric Iliad, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, W. (1986) ‘Flyting and fighting: pathways in the realisation of the epic contest’, Neophilologus 70, 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, W. (1990) Verbal duelling in heroic narrative: the Homeric and Old English tradition, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postlethwaite, N. (1998) ‘Thersites in the Iliad’, in McAuslan, I. & Walcot, P. (eds.) Homer, Greece and Rome studies, (1st publ. 1988) Oxford, 83–95.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1987) Odysseus polutropos: intertextual readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (1997) ‘Homeric society’, in Morris, I. & Powell, B. (eds.), A new companion to Homer, Leiden, 624–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (1998) ‘A historian's headache: how to read “Homeric society”?’, in Fisher, N. & van Wees, H. (eds.) Archaic Greece: new approaches and new evidence, London, 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabel, R. J. (1991) ‘Agamemnon's Iliad’, GRBS 32, 103–17.Google Scholar
Rankin, H. D. (1972) ‘Thersites the malcontent: a discussion’, Symbolae Osloenses 47, 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. M. (1994) Nature and culture in the Iliad: the tragedy of Hector (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1975), Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1961) Die Ilias und ihr Dichter, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1991) ‘Die Probe’, in Latacz, J. (ed.), Homer: Die Dichtung und ihre Deutung (1 st publ. 1961), Darmstadt, 153–69.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1993) The Iliad: a commentary. Vol. 6 (books 21–24), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. (1990) The Homeric narrator, Nashville.Google Scholar
Rose, P. W. (1988) ‘Thersites and the plural voices of Homer’, Arethusa 21, 5–25.Google Scholar
Rose, P. W. (1997) ‘Ideology in the Iliad: polis, basileus, theoi’, Arethusa 30, 151–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (2003) ‘The death of Thersites and the sympotic performance of iambic mockery’, Pallas 61, 121–36.Google Scholar
Ruzé, F. (1997) Délibération et pouvoir dans la cité grecque de Nestor à Socrate, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E. (1983) ‘Opponents, audiences, constituencies and community’, in Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.) The politics of interpretation, Chicago, 7–32.Google Scholar
Sale, W. M. (1994) ‘The government of Troy: politics in the Iliad’, GRBS 35, 5–102.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1987) Iliasstudien (1st publ. 1966), Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1986) ‘Euboulia in the Iliad’, CQ 36, 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) Saving the city: philosopher-kings and other classical paradigms, London.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2002) Listening to Homer: tradition, narrative and audience, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. (1994) Reciprocity and ritual: Homer and tragedy in the developing city-state, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibel, A. (1995) ‘Thersites und Odyseus’, Hermes 123, 385–91.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1982) The discovery of the mind: in Greek philosophy and literature (German orig. 1949), New York.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. (1974) ‘An historical Homeric society?’, JHS 94, 114–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, A. (2002) ‘Telling presences: narrating divine epiphany in Homer and beyond’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1997) ‘The society of the Homeric epics’, in Wright, G. G. & Jones, P. V. (trans.) Homer: German scholarship in translation, Oxford, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taplin, O. (1990) ‘Agamemnon's role in the Iliad’, in Pelling, C. (ed.) Characterisation and individuality in Greek literature, Oxford, 60–82.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1992) Homeric soundings: the shaping of the Iliad, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. (1988) ‘Thersites: comedy, scapegoats, and heroic ideology in the Iliad’, TAPA 118, 1–28.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. (1984) Homer's Iliad: its composition and the motif of supplication, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1984) Mikhail Bakhtin: the dialogical principle, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1982) The origins of Greek thought (French orig. 1962), London.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1983) Myth and thought among the Greeks (French orig. 1965), London.Google Scholar
Vivante, P. (1990) The Iliad: action as poetry, Boston.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. (1958) Homer and the heroic tradition, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willcock, M. M. (1978) The Iliad of Homer, ed. with a commentary, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1993) Shame and necessity, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar