Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:24:12.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2. Further Note on Recent Advance in the History of Medieval Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2011

M. D. Knowles
Get access

Extract

In an article written some five years ago, it was remarked that in no field of medieval studies has recent progress been so notable as in the history of thought. The advance has continued, and already several pages then written have been put out of date by writings that have been subsequently published, or at least made available in England. A few further notes, therefore, to supplement and correct the earlier article, may not be out of place.

Type
Other
Information
Cambridge Historical Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , 1952 , pp. 354 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cambridge Historical Journal, ix, i (1947), pp. 22–50Google Scholar.

2 Histoire de la Philosophie médiévale, vol. iii (6th ed. 1947)Google Scholar. There is an English translation, but this omits the bibliography.

3 Basel, 1951.

4 Histoire de l'Eglise, ed. Fliche, Martin et Jarry, vol. xiii. Le mouvement doctrinal du xie au xive siècle (Paris, 1951). The three parts are by André Forest, F. van Steenberghen and M. de Gandillac respectively.

5 Medieval Studies, xii (Toronto, 1950), pp. 163–213Google Scholar.

6 E.g. ‘S. Bernard et ses secrétaires’, in Revue Benédictine, LXI (1951), pp. 208–229Google Scholar, and literature there cited; ‘S. Bernard et Origène’, ibid. LIX (1949), pp. 183–95.

7 Medieval and Renaissance Studies, ed. Hunt, and Klibansky, , Supplement 1 (London: Warburg Institute, 1952)Google Scholar.

8 Medieval Studies, xii, pp. 123–62.

9 ‘Siger de Brabant d'après ses œuvres inédites’, in Les Philosophes Belges, tom. xii–xiii (Louvain, 1931–2)Google Scholar; Aristote en Occident (Louvain, 1946)Google Scholar; ‘Le xiiie siècle’ in Histoire de l'Eglise, as above, note 4. Cf. also art. ‘Siger’ in Dict. théol. cath.

10 Cf. Gilson, E., ‘F. van Steenberghen, Siger de Brabant’, in Bulletin Thomiste, VI (1945), pp. 5–22Google Scholar.

11 Roger Bacon (Louvain and Dublin, 1950). Since these pages went to press another full-length study of Bacon has appeared: Roger Bacon, by Easton, Stewart (Oxford: Blackwell, 1952)Google Scholar.

12 Histoire de l'Eglise, xiii, p. 260: ‘Ainsi le thomisme apparaît comme un rajeunissement et un approfondissement original de la pensée grecque; en métaphysique, il est un platonisme spécifié par l'aristotélisme plus encore qu'un aristotélisme platonisant.’

13 Introduction à l'étude de S. Thomas d'Aquin (Montreal and Paris, 1950)Google Scholar.

14 Jean Duns Scot: introduction à ses positions fondamentales (Paris, 1952)Google Scholar.

15 Guillaume d'Occam, sa vie, ses œuvres, ses idées sociales et politiques. Vol. 1, L'homme et les œuvres. Etudes de philosophie médiévale, xxxix (Paris, 1950)Google Scholar.

16 Philosophie et Théologie chez Guillaume d'Ockham (Louvain: Paris, 1947)Google Scholar.

17 One of the earliest of these was ‘The Text Tradition of Ockham's “Ordinatio”,’ in The New Scholasticism, xvi (Washington, 1942), p. 227Google Scholar. For numerous more recent articles and notes, see Franciscan Studies (St Bonaventure, N.Y.) and Traditio (Washington, D.C.) during the past five or six years. Criticisms of some of Fr. Boehner's opinions by A. C. Pegis and others have appeared in Traditio (e.g. vol. I (1944)) and Speculum (e.g. vol. xxii, 1948).

18 Wilhelm Ockham (1349–1949), Aufsätze zu seiner Philosophie und Theologie, Franziskanische Studien, vol. xxxii (Münster, 1950)Google Scholar.